Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-fmk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-12T20:31:27.349Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

69. The Burri Smear-Culture Method for the Determination of the Bacterial Content of Milk Samples

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

A. Cunningham  and
A. Andrews
A. Cunningham
Affiliation:
Department of Bacteriology, College of Agriculture, Edinburgh.
A. Andrews
Affiliation:
Department of Bacteriology, College of Agriculture, Edinburgh.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. A comparison has been made of the accuracy of the ordinary plate and Burri smear-culture methods for the determination of the bacterial content of milk samples.

2. In determinations made by the smear-culture technique the percentage error has been shown to be markedly higher than in those made by plating.

3. Evidence is presented in support of the view that the inaccuracy of the Burri method (as ordinarily employed) when compared with the plate technique is partly due to the errors involved in loop measurements and partly to the inferiority of the conditions for growth on slopes to those in plate cultures.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , December 1933 , pp. 29 - 41
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1933

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1) Breed, R. S. and Brew, J. D. (1916). New York Agric. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bull. No. 49.Google Scholar
(2) Breed, R. S. and Dotterrer, W. D. (1916). New York Agric. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bull. No. 53.Google Scholar
(3) Burri, R. (1928). World's Dairy Congress, Report of Proceedings, pp. 690–6.Google Scholar
(4) Conn, H. W. (1915). U.S. Publ. Health Service, Publ. Health Reports, 30, 2349–95, quoted by Breed, and Brew, (loc. cit.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(5) Demont, P. and Dorner, W. (1931). Landw. Jahrb. d. Schweiz, 45, 481–7.Google Scholar
(6) Dorner, W. (1930). New York Agric. Exp. Sia. Tech. Bull. No. 165.Google Scholar
(7) Dorner, W. and Demont, P. (1931). Landw. Jahrb. d. Schweiz, 45, 488–511.Google Scholar
(8) Miller, E. C. L. (1924). J. Lab. and Clin. Med. St Louis, 9, 404–8.Google Scholar
(9) Peskett (1930). Private Communication quoted by Davis, J.Dairy Res. 2, 91.Google Scholar
(10) Riohter, K. (1931). Molkerei Ztg. (Hildesheim), 45, 4–8.Google Scholar