Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T13:50:22.025Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

662. The comparative efficiency of some methods of estimating the live weight of dairy cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

A. W. A. Burt
A. W. A. Burt
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, University of Reading
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Data from 133 Dairy Shorthorn cows in three herds have been used in a study of various methods of estimating live weight from body measurements based on logarithmic relationships and indices of body volume.

2. Regression equations are presented relating live weight to several combinations of chest girth, paunch girth, length of body and age.

3. The most satisfactory estimate of weight from a single body measurement was given by the regression of log live weight upon log chest girth.

4. Appreciable increases in the efficiency of estimation were obtained by including log paunch girth or log length of body as second variates in the regression, and a further increase by including them together.

5. Indices of body volume using chest girth and length of body, or chest girth, paunch girth and length of body gave good estimates of live weight, and there was very little difference in efficiency of estimation from that when the three measurements were used in a logarithmic regression.

6. The effects of the addition of age to regressions involving chest girth, paunch girth and length of body were slight but statistically significant.

7. The most satisfactory practical method of estimation using the three body measurements is given by the equation

Live weight (lb.)=0·000935 LB(CG2+PG2+ PG.CG)+57 (all measurements in inches).

8. Comparison of fiducial limits showed that these covered a range 4–5 times as great for live weights estimated from chest girth than for live weights determined directly, and that the inclusion of length of body and paunch girth reduced this range by 25–30%.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , June 1957 , pp. 144 - 151
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1957

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Ragsdale, A. C. & Brody, S. (1935). Res. Bull. Univ. Mo. agric. exp. Sta. no. 354.Google Scholar
(2)Kendrick, J. F. & Parker, J. B. (1936). U.S. Dep. of Agric. B.DIM. no. 695 mimeo.Google Scholar
(3)Brody, S., Davis, H. P. & Ragsdale, A. C. (1937). Res. Bull. Univ. Mo. agric. exp. Sta. no. 262.Google Scholar
(4)Davis, H. P., Morgan, R. F., Brody, S. & Ragsdale, A. C. (1937). Res. Bull. Univ. Neb. agric. exp. Sta. no. 91.Google Scholar
(5)Misner, E. G. (1944). Cornell Univ. Dep. Agric. Econ. A.E. no. 479.Google Scholar
(6)Gaines, W. L., Davis, H. P. & Morgan, R. F. (1941). J. Dairy Sci. 24, 983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(7)Brody, S. (1945). Bioenergetics and Growth. New York: Reinhold Publ. Co.Google Scholar
(8)Le Chambre, P. (1922). Trait de Zootechnie, Tome III. Paris.Google Scholar
(9)Hvidsten, H. (1940). Beretn. Foringsforsok. Norg. LandbrHøgsk. no. 49.Google Scholar
(10)Ostergaard, P. S. (1950). Beretn. Forsøgslab., Kbh., no. 251.Google Scholar
(11)Johannson, I. & Hildeman, S. E. (1954). Anim. Breed. Abstr. 22, 1.Google Scholar
(12)Delage, J., Poly, J. & Vinac, B. (1955). Ann. Zootech. 4, 219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(13)Tanner, J. M. & Burt, A. W. A. (1954). J. Genet. 52, 36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(14)Touchberry, R. W. & Lush, J. L. (1950). J. Dairy Sci. 33, 72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(15)Huxley, J. S. (1932). Problems of Relative Growth. London.Google Scholar
(16)Ewart, J. (1852). In Morton's, Cyclopaedia of Agriculture, Division V.Google Scholar
(17)Fream, W. (1900). Ed. Youatt's, Complete Grazier, 14th ed. London: Crosby Lockwood and Co.Google Scholar
(18)Burt, A. W. A. (1952). Thesis. University of Reading.Google Scholar
(19)Burt, A. W. A. (1954). J. agric. Sci. 45, 389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(20)Hammond, J. (1927). Reproduction in the Cow. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(21)Putnam, D. N. & Henderson, H. O. (1946). J. Dairy Sci. 29, 657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(22)Snedecor, G. W. (1946). Statistical Methods, 4th ed. Ames, Iowa: Iowa S.C. Press.Google ScholarPubMed
(23)Woolf, B. (1951). J. R. statist. Soc. B, 13, 100.Google Scholar
(24)Bartlett, S. (1926). J. agric. Sci. 16, 383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar