Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T05:36:55.448Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

535. Reactivation of milk phosphatase following heat treatment. III

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

R. C. Wright
Affiliation:
United Dairies Research Laboratories, London
J. Tramer
Affiliation:
United Dairies Research Laboratories, London

Extract

1. Of a number of farm milks examined, two have been found to develop a positive phosphatase reaction following pasteurization at 161° F. in a small H.T.S.T. plant. This phosphatase was not of bacterial origin but was reactivated milk phosphatase.

2. Considerable variation in reactivation following pasteurization at 161° F. was found to occur using individual churns of the above farm milk from any one milking. Individual cow samples also showed similar variation when tested by the capillary method. No explanation of this variation is offered.

3. Commercial bulk raw milk from road or rail tanks did not develop a positive phosphatase reaction after pasteurization at 161° F. on this plant.

4. Cold storage of pasteurized milk susceptible to reactivation results in less reactivation, and some evidence was obtained that cold storage of the corresponding raw milk also results in less reactivation. No such effect has been observed either using the capillary method or with samples of Uperized milk.

5. Pasteurizing at 170 and 180° F. usually resulted in increased reactivation as compared with that obtained after pasteurization at 161° F. Shortening the holding time at these two higher temperatures sometimes led to a further increase in reactivation.

6. It is shown that no clear relationship exists between the results obtained by plant pasteurization and the capillary method.

7. It is suggested that many of the reported cases of pasteurized cream developing a positive phosphatase reaction on storage can be attributed to reactivation of the enzyme.

8. Practical implications of reactivation in relation to pasteurized milk are discussed.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1954

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Wright, R. C. & Tramer, J. (1953). J. Dairy Res. 20, 258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Wright, R. C. & Tramer, J. (1953). J. Dairy Res. 20, 177.Google Scholar
(3)Tramer, J. & Wight, J. (1950). J. Dairy Res. 17, 194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4)Patton, S. & Josephson, D. V. (1949). J. Dairy Sci. 32, 398.Google Scholar
(5)Gould, I. A. (1940). J. Dairy Sci. 23, 977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(6)Rosner, L. (1940). J. Biol. Chem. 132, 657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(7)Fuchs, A. (1953). XIIIth Intern. Dairy Congr., 3, 1018.Google Scholar
(8)Mohler, H. (1952). Chimia, 6, 212.Google Scholar
(9)Brown, W. H. & Elliker, P. R. (1941). Proc. Indiana Branch, Soc. Amer. Bact. 14 Nov. (J. Bact. 43, 118, 1942.)Google Scholar
(10)Burgwald, L. H. (1941). Int. Ass. Milk Dlrs, 33 (14) 366.Google Scholar
(11)Barber, F. W. (1942). Milk Dlr, 32, 66.Google Scholar
(12)Report of Committee for Expts. of the Royal Neth. Dairy Fedn. Neth. Milk & Dairy Journal, 6, (1952), 82.Google Scholar
(13)Posthumus, G. (1952). Off. Organ. F.N.Z. 44, 458.Google Scholar
(14)Wiley, W. J., Newman, F. S. J. & Whitehead, H. R. (1941). J. counc. Sci. Indust. Res. 14, 121.Google Scholar
(15)Ritter, W. (1952). Milchwissenschaft, 7, 301.Google Scholar
(16)Paschke, B. (1952). Milchwissenschaft, 7, 3.Google Scholar
(17)Paschke, B. (1953). Milchvnssenschaft, 8, 266.Google Scholar