Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T22:21:57.468Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

310. The influence of ‘abnormal’ milk upon the yield and quality of Cheddar cheese*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

C. K. Johns
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, Ottawa, Canada
C. A. Gibson
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, Ottawa, Canada

Extract

In studies previously reported (1) it was found that milk of normal appearance from cows having a latent infection with Streptococcus agalactiae yielded less cheese than that from cows with normal udders. Milk from cows free from Str. agalactiae infection, yet classed as ‘abnormal’ on the basis of biochemical tests, behaved similarly. The lower yield appeared to result from the lower casein and solids-not-fat contents of these ‘mastitis’ milks. With a single exception, the quality of the cheese made from these milks was not inferior to that of cheese made from normal milks. These findings appeared to warrant the extension of the studies to ordinary cheese-factory milks.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1944

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Johns, Hicks, & Gibson, (1940). J. Dairy Res. 11, 298.Google Scholar
(2)Davis, & McClemont, (1939). J. Dairy Res. 10, 74.Google Scholar
(3)Davis, (1939). Agric. Progr. 16, 31.Google Scholar
(4)Rowlands, (1942). Chem. & Ind. 61, 252.Google Scholar
(5)Johns, & Hastings, (1938). Can. J. Res. 16, D, 6.Google Scholar
(6)Van Slyke, & Price, (1938). Cheese, 2nd ed. New York: Orange Judd Publishing Co.Google Scholar
(7)American Public Health Association (1941). Standard Methods for the Analysis of Dairy Products, 8th ed. New York, N.Y.Google Scholar
(8)Price, (1940). Private communication.Google Scholar
(9)Johns, & Katznelson, (1941). Can. J. Res. 19, C, 49.Google Scholar
(10)Marquardt, & Needham, (1941). Tech. Bull. N.Y. St. agric. Exp. Sta. no. 257.Google Scholar
(11)Marquardt, & Yale, (1941). Mimeo. Circ. N.Y. St. Dep. Agric. & Markets.Google Scholar
(12)Hood, & White, (1927). Bull. Dom. Dep. Agric. no. 79, New Series.Google Scholar
(13)Price, (1934). Nat. Butt. & Cheese J. 25 (21), 24.Google Scholar
(14)Mattick, et al. (1937). Int. Dairy Congr. Berlin, 11, I, 283.Google Scholar