Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T22:27:12.446Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

306. A study of Bacillus subtilis and related organisms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

T. Gibson
T. Gibson
Affiliation:
Bacteriology Department, College of Agriculture, Edinburgh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A group of species, comprising Bacillus subtilis and related organisms, may be differentiated from other members of the genus Bacillus by (a) morphology and (b) the production of acid and acetylmethylcarbinol from glucose. The group may be divided into three species:

(1) B. subtilis Cohn emend. Prazmowski, the synonyms of which include B. aterrimus, B. globigii, B. mesentericus, B. niger, B. panis, and B. vulgatus.

(2) B. pumilus Gottheil, which resembles strains of (1) that produce a smooth glossy growth. It differs in failing to secrete diastase and in other features, but its separation as a distinct species is still an open question. It is sometimes identified as B. mesentericus.

(3) B. licheniformis (Weigmann) Gibson, the synonyms of which include B. subtilis (as used by Ford), B. globigii and B. mesentericus ruber. This species may be differentiated from (1) and (2) by its cultural characters, slow proteolytic action, vigorous CO2 production and ability to grow anaerobically.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 13 , Issue 3 , March 1944 , pp. 248 - 260
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1944

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1) Int. Soc. Microbiol. (1936). Rep. Proc. 2nd Int. Congr. Micrdbiol. London, p. 28.Google Scholar
(2)St John-Brooks, R. & Breed, R. S. (1937). J. Bact. 33, 445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3)Cohn, F. (1872). Beitr. Biol. Pfl. 1, Heft 2, 175.Google Scholar
(4)Prazmowski, A. (1880). Untersuchungen über die Entwickelungsgeschickte und Fermentwirkung einiger Bacterien-Arten. Inaug.-Diss. Leipzig.Google Scholar
(5)Gottheil, O. (1901). Zbl. Bakt. II, 7, 633, 680, 689, 717.Google Scholar
(6)Lamanna, C. (1942). J. Bact. 44, 611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(7)Gibson, T. (1937). “The Identity of Bacillus subtilis and its Differentiation from other Sporeforming Organisms.” Proc. Soc. agric. Bact.Google Scholar
(8)Gibson, T. & Topping, L. E. (1938). Proc. Soc. agric. Bact. p. 43.Google Scholar
(9)Barrett, M. M. (1936). J. Path. Bact. 42, 441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(10)Burdon, K. L., Stokes, J. C. & Kimbrough, C. E. (1942). J. Bact. 44, 163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(11)Lamanna, C. (1940). J. Bact. 40, 347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(12)Lamanna, C. (1940). J. infect. Dis. 67, 193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(13)O'Meara, R. A. Q. (1931). J. Path. Bact. 34, 401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(14)Flügge, C. (1886). Die Mikroorganismen (Also 3. Aufl. 1896). Leipzig.Google Scholar
(15)Trevisan, V. (1889). I genera e le specie delle Batteriacee. Milan.Google Scholar
(16)Ford, W. W., Lawrence, J. S., Laubach, C. A. & Rice, J. L. (1916). J. Bact. 1, 273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(17)Gee, A. H. (1927). J. infect. Dis. 41, 355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(18)Wahlin, J. G. (1930). J. infect. Dis. 46, 253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(19)Greig Smith, R. (1902). Zbl. Bakt. II, 8, 596.Google Scholar
(20)Migula, W. (1900). System der Bakterien. Jena.Google Scholar
(21)Chester, F. D. (1904). Rep. Dd. agric. Exp. Sta. 15, 42.Google Scholar
(22)Hood, E. G. & White, A. H. (1926). Proc. roy. Soc. Can. 20, sec. 5, p. 383.Google Scholar
(23)Fuhrmann, F. (1906). Zbl. Bakt. II, 15, 385, 538.Google Scholar
(24)Fuhrmann, F. (1926). Einführung in die Orundlagen der technischen Mykologie, 2. Aufl. Jena.Google Scholar
(25)Seligmann, E. (1919). Zbl. Bakt. I, Orig. 83, 39.Google Scholar
(26)Spitzer, G. & Epple, W. F. (1920). J. Dairy Set. 8, 486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(27)Czadek, O. Von & Kornauth, K. (1902). Z. landw. VersWes. Öst. 5, 885 (Ref. Zbl. Bakt. II, 9, 1902, 683).Google Scholar
(28)Vogel, J. (1897). Z. Hyg. Infekt Kr. 26, 398.Google Scholar
(29)Kerckhoff, H. (1927). Zbl. Bakt. II, 72, 353.Google Scholar
(30)Flynn, C. S. & Rettgeb, L. F. (1934). J. Bact. 28, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(31)Morrison, E. W. & Rettger, L. F. (1930). J. Bact. 20, 299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(32)Owen, W. L. (1923). J. Bact. 8, 421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(33)Ivanovics, G. (1938). Zbl. Bakt. I, Orig. 142, 52.Google Scholar
(34)Console, A. D. & Rahn, O. (1938). J. Bact. 36, 52.Google Scholar
(35)Gorini, C. (1894). G. Soc. ital. Igiene, 16, no. 1 (Zbl. Bakt. I, 20, 1896, 94). J. Dairy Research 13Google Scholar
(36)Lehmann, K. B. & Neumann, R. O. (1896). Atlas und Grundriss der Bakteriologie (7. Aufl, 1927) München.Google Scholar
(37)Lunt, J. (1896). Zbl. Bakt. II, 2, 572.Google Scholar
(38)Clark, F. E. & Smith, N. R. (1939). J. Bact. 37, 277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(39)Gordon, R. E. & Smith, N. R. (1942). J. Bact. 43, 55.Google Scholar
(40)Klein, L. (1889). Zbl. Bakt. 6, 348, 381.Google Scholar
(41)Hueppe, F. (1884). Mitt. kais. GesundhAmk. 2, 353.Google Scholar
(42)Neide, E. (1904). Zbl. Bakt. II, 12, 168, 344.Google Scholar
(43)Duclaux, E. (1887). Le Lait, Paris, p. 213. (Original not seen.)Google Scholar
(44)Rosenthal, L. (1925). C.R. Soc. Biol., Paris, 92, 78.Google Scholar
(45)Löhnis, F. (1910). Handbuch landwirtschaftlichen Bakteriologie. Berlin.Google Scholar
(46)Chester, F. D. (1904). Zbl. Bakt. II, 13, 737.Google Scholar
(47)Ford, W. W. (1927). Textbook of Bacteriology. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
(48)Gibson, T. (1935). Zbl. Bakt. II, 92, 376.Google Scholar
(49)Holzmüller, K. (1909). Zbl. Bakt. II, 23, 304.Google Scholar
(50)Truffaut, G. & Bezssonoff, N. (1922). C.R. Acad. Sci., Paris, 175, 544.Google Scholar
(51)Mackenzie, I. (1931). In System of Bacteriology, 8, 99. London, Medical Research Council.Google Scholar
(52)Bergey, D. H. et al. (1939). Manual of Determinative Bacteriology, 5th ed. Baltimore.Google Scholar
(53)Gibson, T. & Abdel-Malek, Y. In the Press.Google Scholar
(54)Weigmann, H. (1898). Zbl. Bakt. II, 4, 820.Google Scholar
(55)Laxa, O. (1900). Zbl. Bakt. II, 6, 288.Google Scholar
(56)Maassen, A. (1905). Arb. biol. Abt. Berl. 5, 1.Google Scholar
(57)Gruber, T. (1907). Zbl. Bakt. II, 17, 644.Google Scholar
(58)Fred, E. B., Peterson, W. H. & Carroll, W. R. (1925). J. Bact. 10, 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(59)Cunningham, A. (1931). Zbl. Bakt. II, 83, 10.Google Scholar