Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T05:07:25.210Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

187. The effect of subclinical mastitis on the solids-not-fat content of milk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

S. J. Rowland
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Chemistry, University of Reading
M. Zein-El-Dine
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Chemistry, University of Reading

Extract

The solids-not-fat content (expressed as a percentage of fat-free milk) has been determined for 247 samples of milk from the individual quarters of sixty-two cows. The samples were also examined bacteriologically for the presence of mastitis streptococci and 121 were found to be infected, 114 uninfected, and twelve “doubtful”.

The solids-not-fat content of the uninfected samples varied from 8·24 to 10·28 and of the infected samples from 4·26 to 9·92. For the uninfected samples of the Shorthorn, Friesian, Ayrshire and Guernsey breeds it averaged 9·36, 9·11, 9·82 and 9·83 respectively, but in the infected samples only 8·44, 8·38, 8·28 and 9·49%.

Of the 247 samples, 36 % were below 8·80 in solids-not-fat content. Of 121 infected samples, 63% were below while of the 114 uninfected samples only 9% were below this standard. Hence 88% of the samples below 8·80 were infected samples, thus showing that subclinical mastitis accounts for a very high percentage of samples low in solids-not-fat content. In these samples the average value for solids-not-fat was 7·93%. The few uninfected samples that were low in solids-not-fat averaged 8·56%.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1938

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1) Rowland, (1938). J. Dairy Res. 9, 51.Google Scholar
(2) Rowland, & Zbin-El-Dine, (1938). J. Dairy Res. 9, 174.Google Scholar