Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T23:47:27.946Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

116. Factors affecting Milk and Butterfat Secretion. II. The Colour of the Butterfat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Elizabeth O. Whetham  and
John Hammond
Elizabeth O. Whetham
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, Cambridge.
John Hammond
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, Cambridge.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. The colours of the butter for individual cows at the London Dairy Show have been measured on a colour scale of yellow shades on cellulose strips, and the results analysed statistically.

2. The mean values and variability curves of the ranges of butter colour in the different breeds of dairy cattle are given. Circumstances which may affect these values are indicated.

3. The two most important factors affecting butter colour are the genetic character of the cow and the method of feeding.

4. A slight increase in the shade of colour was found to occur under most of the various conditions which give rise to increased milk yield. It is suggested that this may be due to the greater intake of colouring matter (associated with the greater food intake) in proportion to butterfat produced, since increase in yield is usually associated with decrease in fat percentage.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 6 , Issue 3 , September 1935 , pp. 340 - 352
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1935

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1) Palmer, and Eckles, (1914). Res. Bull. Mo. agric. Exp. Sta. Nos. 10, 11 and 12.Google Scholar
(2) Steenbock, and Boutwell, (1920). J. biol. Chem. 41, 81; 42, 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3) Booth, , Kon, , Dann, and Moore, (1933). Biochem. J. 27, 1189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4) Anonymous, (1932). “Vitamins—a survey of present knowledge”. Spec. Rep. Ser. Med. Res. Coun., Lond., No. 167.Google Scholar
(5) Steenbock, , Sell, and Buell, (1921). J. biol. Cliem. 47, 89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(6) Golding, , Soames, and Zilva, (1926). Biochem. J. 20, 1306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(7) Sutton, and Kratjss, (1934). Proc. Soc. Amer. Dairy Sci.Google Scholar
(8) Wilbur, , Hilton, and Hauge, (1933). J. Dairy Sci. 16, 153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(9) Davis, and Hathaway, (1931). Bull. Neb. agric. Exp. Sta. No. 54.Google Scholar
(10) Pease, (1928). Z. indukt. Abstamm.-u. VererbLehre, Suppl. 2.Google Scholar
(11) Castle, (1933). Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., Wash., 19, 947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(12) Thompson, (1931). Guernsey Breed. J. (U.S.A.), 40, 11. 15, 12. 1 and 15; and 1932, 41, 11. 1 and 12. 1.Google Scholar
(13) Riddle, (1911). J. Morph. 22, 455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(14) Watson, , Bishop, and Drummond, (1934). Biochem. J. 28, 1076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(15) Gillam, , Heilbron, , Morton, , Bishop, and Drttmmond, (1933). Biochem. J. 27, 878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(16) The Forecast (U.S.A.), 01. 1932.Google Scholar
(17) Tucker, and Pfau, (1935). Guernsey Breed. J. (U.S.A.), 47, 02. 1.Google Scholar
(18) Smith, and Briggs, (1933). J. agric. Res. 46, 229.Google Scholar
(19) J. Brit. Dairy Fmrs’ Ass. (1933).Google Scholar
(20) Répertoire de Couleurs (1903). Soc. Francaise des Chrysanthèmistes, Paris.Google Scholar
(21) Steensberg, (1934). Ber. 159 Forsøgslab. Kgl. Vet. og Landbohojskole, Copenhagen, p. 64.Google Scholar
(22) Whetham, and Hammond, (1935). J. Dairy Res. 6, 320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(23) Dann, (1933). Biochem J. 27, 1998.Google Scholar
(24) Hirzel, J. agric. Sci. 25, 541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(25) Hammond, (1927). Reproduction in the Cow. Cambridge.Google Scholar
(26) Blakeslee, and Warner, (1915). Amer. Nat. 49, 360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(27) Palmer, and Kempster, (1919). J. biol. Chem. 39, 313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(28) Guilbert, and Hart, (1934). J. Nutrit. 8, 25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(29) Gaines, and Davidson, (1923). Bull. Illinois agric. Exp. Sta. No. 245.Google Scholar
(30) Hansson, (1928). Proc. 8th World's Dairy Congress, London, p. 190.Google Scholar
(31) Yapp, and Ktjhlman, (1926-1927). Rep. Illinois agric. Exp. Sta. p. 154; and 1930–1931, p. 124.Google Scholar
(32) Doan, (1924). J. Dairy Sci. 7, 147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar