Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T21:43:24.423Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

56 Impact of ACTIV-6 treatment on PROMIS-29 at 7, 14, 28, and 90 days

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 April 2024

Julia Whitman
Affiliation:
Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Mark Sulkowski
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University
Russell Rothman
Affiliation:
Institute for Medicine and Public Health, Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Chris Lindsell
Affiliation:
Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke Clinical Research Institute
Jennifer Barrett
Affiliation:
Institute for Medicine and Public Health, Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Thomas Stewart
Affiliation:
School of Data Science, University of Virginia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: As mortality and morbidity from acute COVID-19 decline, the impact of COVID-19 on short- and long-term quality of life (QoL) becomes critical to address. We assessed the impact of re-purposed COVID-19 therapies on QoL as a secondary outcome measure in ACTIV-6, a decentralized platform trial. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Adults aged ≥30 with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 enroll in ACTIV-6 online or through a study site. Patients are randomized to a medication of interest or placebo. Medications are mailed and symptoms are tracked using electronic diaries. QoL is measured#_msocom_1 using the PROMIS-29 questionnaire. Adjusted Bayesian logistic regression models are used to measure effects of treatment on the seven PROMIS-29 QoL domains at days 7, 14, 28#_msocom_2 and 90. Covariates are treatment, age, gender, symptom duration and severity, vaccination status, geographic region, call center#_msocom_3#_msocom_4, and calendar time. Treatment effects are described using ORs, 95% credible intervals, and posterior probabilities of efficacy, P(eff). RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: There are 5,362 patients included, representing four of the study arms in ACTIV-6. We report results where P(eff)<0.025 and P(eff)>0.975 in the table below. Table 1. Scale Day: OR* (95% credible interval, P(eff)) Therapy Physical Anxiety Depression Fatigue Sleep Social Pain Ivermectin 400 — Ivermectin 600 D7: 0.77 (0.61-0.96, 0.01) D14: 0.65 (0.49-0.85, <0.01) D28: 0.69 (0.52-0.92, 0.01) — D7: 0.79 (0.64-0.97, 0.01) — D14 0.78 (0.60-1.00, 0.02) D28: 0.66 (0.50-0.87, <0.01) Fluticasone - D14: 0.77 (0.60-0.99, 0.02) — D7: 0.76 (0.62-0.93, <0.01) D90: 0.79 (0.64-0.98, 0.01) — D7: 0.74 (0.59-0.93, 0.01) Fluvoxamine D7: 0.66 (0.51-0.84, 0.01) — D28: 1.38 (1.02, 1.85, 0.98) D7: 0.78 (0.63-0.97, 0.01) D7: 0.77 (0.62-0.95, 0.01) — *OR > 1 favors active intervention DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Results suggest fluvoxamine may improve depression scores by day 28, while placebo is favored in several other scales across treatments. Differences between treatment and placebo are not seen at most other timepoints. This trial is ongoing and future work will include results from additional ACTIV-6 study arms.

Type
Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Research Design
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. The Association for Clinical and Translational Science