Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T20:59:25.747Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

417 Identifying Biomarkers of Social Threat Sensitivity Associated with Social Anxiety and Depressive Symptoms in Adolescents

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 April 2024

Madison Politte-Corn
Affiliation:
Penn State Clinical and Translational Science Institute
Kristin A. Buss
Affiliation:
The Pennsylvania State University
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Increases in anxiety and depression during adolescence may be related to increased biological reactivity to negative social feedback (i.e., social threat sensitivity). Our goal was to identify biomarkers of social threat sensitivity, which may provide unique etiological insight to inform early detection and intervention efforts. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Adolescents aged 12-14 (N=84; 55% female; 80% White; 69% annual family income <$70,000) were recruited. Youth viewed a series of happy, neutral, and angry faces while eye-tracking and electroencephalogram (EEG) data were recorded to capture cognitive and neural markers of sensitivity to social threat (i.e., an angry face). Fixation time and time to disengage from angry faces were derived from eye-tracking and event-related potentials were derived from EEG, which index rapid attention capture (P1), attention selection and discrimination (N170), and cognitive control (N2). Adolescents also completed a social stress task and provided salivary cortisol samples to assess endocrine reactivity. Social anxiety and depressive symptoms were self-reported concurrently and one year later. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Latency to disengage from threatening faces was associated with lower N2 amplitudes (indexing poor cognitive control; r= -.24, p = .03) and higher concurrent social anxiety (r = .28, p = .01). Higher N170 amplitudes, reflecting attentional selection and discrimination in favor of threatening faces, predicted increases in depressive symptoms one year later (b= .88, p = .02). No other neurophysiological measures were associated with each other or with concurrent or prospective symptomatology. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Eye-tracking and EEG measures indexing difficulty disengaging from social threat and poor cognitive control may be biomarkers of social anxiety, which could be utilized as novel intervention targets. High N170 amplitudes to social threat, derived from EEG, may have clinical utility as a susceptibility/risk biomarker for depressive symptoms.

Type
Precision Medicine/Health
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. The Association for Clinical and Translational Science