Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T11:14:41.579Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4099 Principles of Statistical Education for Translational Scientists in the Age of Rigor, Reproducibility, and Reporting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 July 2020

Emilia Bagiella
Affiliation:
Mount Sinai School of Medicine
Paul Christos
Affiliation:
Mount Sinai School of Medicine
Mimi Kim
Affiliation:
Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Shing Lee
Affiliation:
Mount Sinai School of Medicine
Roger Vaughan
Affiliation:
Rockefeller University
Judy Zhong
Affiliation:
New York University General Clinical Research Center
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: To describe principles, best practices, and techniques recommended to instill deep understanding of the application and interpretation of statistical techniques and statistical inference among translational scientists and trainees, that best support the concepts of scientific Rigor, Reproducibility and Reporting. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Each of the six New York City Area Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Research Design (BERD) resources have strong educational programs, novel curricular components, and creative strategies, implemented by award winning educators. To capitalize on shared knowledge, innovation, and resources, the six teams formed the New York City Area BERD Collaborative (NYC-ABC) comprised of BERD resources from Mt. Sinai, Cornell, Einstein, Columbia, Rockefeller, and NYU. The collaborative suggests principles, concepts, tools and approaches to support the concepts of scientific Rigor, Reproducibility and Reporting in translational science. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Principles:

  • Value of team science approach and including biostatisticians early and often.

  • Carefully designing experiments to reduce bias and increase precision.

  • Trainees’ focus is often on “statistical significance” and the p-value. Consequences of data dredging/p-hacking, and the impact of sample size and other factors on statistical significance.

  • Emphasizing the effect size and answering the scientific hypothesis when reporting results.

  • Statistical code used to produce results should be well annotated and raw data posted online to enhance reproducibility.

Approaches:
  • Incorporate effective multiple modalities (i.e. didactic, demonstrative, hands on workshops, applications, and tools).

  • Approach from “the drivers’ seat” perspective, rather than strictly mathematical.

  • Endorse flipped classroom approach

DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Like any complex discipline, biostatistical education can be approached from several dimensions, but it remains essential to focus on fundamental goals of science. We remind our trainees that the goal of science is to create knowledge, not to “find significance”. Deep understanding of inferential methods and proper interpretation of results are key. CONFLICT OF INTEREST DESCRIPTION: None.

Type
Data Science/Biostatistics/Informatics
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2020