Hostname: page-component-669899f699-ggqkh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-25T08:31:19.005Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

34 Cognitive models of reading are also models of the brain: Identifying the neural correlates of a computational model of reading

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 April 2025

Ryan Staples
Affiliation:
Georgetown University Medical Center
Andrew DeMarco
Affiliation:
Georgetown University Medical Center
Peter E. Turkeltaub
Affiliation:
Georgetown University Medical Center, Medstar National Rehabilitation Hospital
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Objectives/Goals: Many left hemisphere stroke survivors have a reading disorder (alexia), which is experienced as decreasing well-being. Therapies produce inconsistent results, demonstrating a need for treatment response predictors. We identify neural correlates of a computational model of reading, which may provide biomarkers to improve therapeutic outcomes. Methods/Study Population: Left hemisphere stroke survivors (LHSS) (n  =  52) performed an oral reading task and tests of semantic and phonological processing. Artificial neural network (ANN) models, mapping between orthography (visual word form), phonology (auditory word form), and semantics (word meaning), were trained to read single words at an adult reading level. Stroke was simulated by removing percentages (in 10% intervals) of the connections into and out of semantics, phonology, and the combination thereof. The lesioned model producing the smallest average Euclidean distance over word and pseudoword reading accuracy to each LHSS was selected as the matched model. Two voxelwise lesion-symptom mapping (VLSM) analyses identified the neural correlates of the percent of phonological and semantic links removed in the matched models. Results/Anticipated Results: Model reading was correlated with LHSS reading (high-frequency regular words, r(48) = 0.96; high-frequency irregular words, r(48) = 0.94; low-frequency regular words, r(48) = 0.97); low-frequency irregular words, r(48) = 0.85; all p’s Discussion/Significance of Impact: Our results show that ANN models of reading, when closely matched to LHSS reading performance, directly connect cognitive processes to the brain. Using matched models as a precision medicine framework to predict therapy response or to identify targets for neurostimulation provides a valuable route toward improving poststroke language outcomes.

Type
Precision Medicine/Health
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. The Association for Clinical and Translational Science