Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T13:16:54.384Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Vowel development in an emergent Mandarin-English bilingual child: a longitudinal study*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2014

JING YANG*
Affiliation:
Department of Speech and Hearing Science, The Ohio State University, USA Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Central Arkansas, USA
ROBERT A. FOX
Affiliation:
Department of Speech and Hearing Science, The Ohio State University, USA
EWA JACEWICZ
Affiliation:
Department of Speech and Hearing Science, The Ohio State University, USA
*
Address for Correspondence: Jing Yang, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Central Arkansas, 201Donaghey Ave, UCA Box 4985, Conway, AR 72035. e-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

This longitudinal case study documents the emergence of bilingualism in a young monolingual Mandarin boy on the basis of an acoustic analysis of his vowel productions recorded via a picture-naming task over 20 months following his enrollment in an all-English (L2) preschool at the age of 3;7. The study examined (1) his initial L2 vowel space, (2) the process of L1-L2 separation, and (3) his L1 vowel system in relation to L2. The child initially utilized his L1 base in building the L2 vowel system. The L1-L2 separation started from a drastic restructuring of his working vowel space to create maximal contrast between the two languages. Meanwhile, L1 developmental processes and influence of L2 on L1 were also in effect. The developmental profile of this child uncovered strategies sequential bilingual children may use to restructure their phonetic space and construct a new system of contrasts in L2.

Type
Brief Research Reports
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[*]

This research was supported, in part, by the Ruth Becky Irwin Fund in the Department of Speech and Hearing Science at The Ohio State University. The authors would also like to thank the subject and his mother for participating in this longitudinal study.

References

REFERENCES

Adank, P., Smits, R. & van Hout, R. (2004). A comparison of vowel normalization procedures for language variation research. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 116, 3099–107.Google Scholar
Assmann, P. F. & Katz, W. F. (2000). Time-varying spectral change in the vowels of children and adults. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 108, 1856–66.Google Scholar
Baker, W. & Trofimovich, P. (2005). Interaction of native- and second-language vowel systems(s) in early and late bilinguals. Language and Speech 48, 127.Google Scholar
Buder, E. H. & Stoel-Gammon, C. (2002). American and Swedish children's acquisition of vowel duration: effects of vowel identity and final stop voicing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 111, 1854–64.Google Scholar
Chung, H., Kong, E., Edwards, J., Weismer, G., Fourakis, M. & Hwang, Y. (2012). Cross-linguistic studies of children's and adults’ vowel spaces. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 131, 442–54.Google Scholar
Duanmu, S. (2000). The phonology of standard Chinese. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: theory, findings and problems. In Strange, W. (ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: issues in cross-language research, 233–73. Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1999). Age of learning and second-language speech. In Birdsong, D. P. (ed.), Second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis, 101–32. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Flege, J., Schirru, C. & MacKay, I. (2003). Interaction between the native and second language phonetic subsystems. Speech Communication 40, 467–91.Google Scholar
Fox, R. A. & Jacewicz, E. (2010). Dialect and generational differences in vowel space areas. In Botinis, A. (Ed.), Proceedings of ISCA Tutorial and Research Workshop on Experimental Linguistics, 3740. Athens: ISCA and the University of Athens.Google Scholar
Guion, S. G. (2003). The vowel systems of Quichua-Spanish bilinguals. Phonetica 60, 98128.Google Scholar
Guion, S. G., Flege, J. E. & Loftin, J. D. (2000). The effect of L1 use on pronunciation in Quichua-Spanish bilinguals. Journal of Phonetics 28, 2742.Google Scholar
Jacewicz, E., Fox, R. A. & Salmons, J. (2007). Vowel space areas across dialects and gender. In Trouvain, J. & Barry, W. J. (Eds.), Proceedings of the XVIth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 1465–8. Saarbrücken.Google Scholar
Jacewicz, E., Fox, R. A. & Salmons, J. (2011a). Cross-generational vowel change in American English. Language Variation and Change 23, 4586.Google Scholar
Jacewicz, E., Fox, R. A. & Salmons, J. (2011b). Regional dialect variation in the vowel systems of typically developing children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 54, 448–70.Google Scholar
Kent, R. D. & Read, C. (1992). The acoustic analysis of speech. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing.Google Scholar
Kučera, H. & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.Google Scholar
Kuhl, P. K. & Meltzoff, A. N. (1996). Infant vocalization in response to speech: vocal imitation and developmental change. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 100, 2425–38.Google Scholar
Kuhl, P. K., Tsao, F. M. & Liu, H. M. (2003). Foreign language experience in infancy: effects of short-term exposure and social interaction on phonetic learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100, 9096–101.Google Scholar
Lin, T. & Wang, L. (2001). Yuyinxue Jiaocheng [A course in phonetics]. Beijing: Beijing Daxue Chubanshe [Peking University Press].Google Scholar
Liu, S., Han, D., Zhang, N., Wu, X., Sheng, Y., Mo, L., Yang, Y. & Kong, Y. (2008). The development of database of everyday speech material for pre-school Mandarin children. Journal of Audiology and Speech Pathology 16(2), 121–4.Google Scholar
Lobanov, B. M. (1971). Classification of Russian vowels spoken by different listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 49, 606–8.Google Scholar
Lowie, W. (2012). Dynamic systems theory approaches to second language acquisition. In Chapelle, C. (ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. London: Willey/Blackwell.Google Scholar
MacLeod, A. A. N., Stoel-Gammon, C. & Wassink, A. B. (2009). Production of high vowels in Canadian English and Canadian French: a comparison of early bilingual and monolingual speakers. Journal of Phonetics 37, 374–87.Google Scholar
McGowan, R. W., McGowan, R. S., Denny, M. & Nittrouer, S. (2014). A longitudinal study of very young children's vowel production. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 57, 115.Google Scholar
Milenkovic, P. (2003). TF32 software program. University of Wisconsin, Madison.Google Scholar
Pollock, K. E. (2007). Speech acquisition in second first language learners (Children who were adopted internationally). In McLeod, S. (ed.), International guide to speech acquisition, 107–12. New York: Thompson-Delmar Learning.Google Scholar
Shi, F. & Wen, B. (2007). Vowel development of Mandarin-speaking children. Chinese Language and Writing (Zhongguo Yuwen) 5, 444–54.Google Scholar
Si, Y. (2006). The child acquisition of Putonghua phonology: a case study. Contemporary Linguistics (Dangdai Yuyanxue) 1, 93–4.Google Scholar
Simon, E. (2010). Child L2 development: a longitudinal case study on Voice Onset Times in word-initial stops. Journal of Child Language 37, 159–73.Google Scholar
Stoel-Gammon, C. & Herrington, P. (1990). Vowel systems of normally developing and phonologically disordered children. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 4, 145–60.Google Scholar
Stoel-Gammon, C. & Pollock, E. (2008). Vowel development and disorders. In Ball, M. J., Perkins, M. R., Müller, N. & Howard, S. (eds), The handbook of clinical linguistics, 525–48. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, E. R. & Kendall, T. (2007). NORM: the vowel normalization and plotting suite. Online: <http://ncslaap.lib.ncsu.edu/tools/norm/about_norm1.php#scaling>..>Google Scholar
Thorndike, E. L. & Lorge, I. (1944). The teacher's word book of 30,000 words. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, L. (2007). Early bilingualism, language transfer, and phonological awareness. Applied Psycholinguistics 28, 425–39.Google Scholar
Vorperian, H. K. & Kent, R. D. (2007). Vowel acoustic space development in children: a synthesis of acoustic and anatomic data. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 50, 1510–45.Google Scholar