Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T23:46:07.881Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Use of a head camera to examine maternal input and its relation to 10- to 26-month-olds’ acquisition of mental and non-mental state vocabulary

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 May 2020

Ted RUFFMAN ,
Ben LORIMER ,
Sarah VANIER ,
Damian SCARF ,
Kangning DU  and
Mele TAUMOEPEAU
Ted RUFFMAN*
Affiliation:
University of Otago, New Zealand
Ben LORIMER
Affiliation:
University of Otago, New Zealand
Sarah VANIER
Affiliation:
University of Otago, New Zealand
Damian SCARF
Affiliation:
University of Otago, New Zealand
Kangning DU
Affiliation:
University of Otago, New Zealand
Mele TAUMOEPEAU
Affiliation:
University of Otago, New Zealand
*
*Address for correspondence:Ted Ruffman Department of Psychology University of Otago PO Box 56 DunedinNew Zealand e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We examined the relation between maternal responsiveness and children's acquisition of mental and non-mental state vocabulary in 59 pairs of mothers and children aged 10 to 26 months as they engaged in a free-play episode. Children wore a head camera and responsiveness was defined as maternal talk that commented on the child's actions (e.g., when the child reached for or manipulated an object visible in the head camera). As hypothesized, maternal responsiveness correlated with both mental and non-mental state vocabulary acquisition in younger children (approximately 18 months and younger) but not older children. We posit a diminishing role for maternal responsiveness in language acquisition as children grow older.

Keywords

maternal responsivenessmental state vocabularynon-mental state vocabulary
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 47 , Issue 6 , November 2020 , pp. 1228 - 1243
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adrian, J .E, Clemente, R. A., Villanueva, L., & Rieffe, C. (2005). Parent-child picture-book reading, mothers’ mental state language and children's theory of mind. Journal of Child Language, 32, 673–686. Doi: 10.1017/S0305000905006963CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Akhtar, N., Jipson, J., & Callanan, M. A. (2001). Learning words through overhearing. Child Development, 72, 416–430. Doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Althaus, N., & Mareschal, D. (2014). Labels direct infants’ attention to commonalities during novel category learning. PLoSONE, 9, e99670. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099670CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Althaus, N., & Plunkett, K. (2016). Categorization in infancy: Labeling induces a persisting focus on commonalities. Development Science, 19. 770–780. Doi: 10.1111/desc.12358CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beeghly, M., Bretherton, I., & Mervis, C. B. (1986). Mothers’ internal state language to toddlers. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 4, 247–261. Doi: 10.1111/j.2044-835X.1986.tb01016.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burling, J. M., & Yoshida, H. (2019). Visual constancies amidst changes in handled objects for 5- to 24-month-old infants. Child Development, 90, 452–461. Doi: 10.1111/cdev.13201CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butterworth, G., & Jarrett, N. (1991). What minds have in common is space: Spatial mechanisms serving joint visual attention in infancy. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 55–72. Doi: 10.1111/j.2044-835X.1991.tb00862.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, M., Nagell, K., & Tomasello, M. (1998). Social cognition, joint attention, and communicative competence from 9 to 15 months of age. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 63 (4, Serial No. 255). Doi: 10.2307/1166214CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Devine, R. T., & Hughes, C. (2018). Family correlates of false belief understanding in early childhood: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 89, 971–987. Doi: 10.111/cdev.12682CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Estigarribia, B., & Clark, E. V. (2007). Getting and maintaining attention in talk to young children. Journal of Child Language, 34, 799–814. Doi: 10.1017/S0305000907008161CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fenson, L., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S., Thal, D., Bates, E., Hartung, J. P., Pethick, S., & Reilly, J. S. (1993). The MacArthur Communicative Development Inventories: User's guide and technical manual. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Fenson, L., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S., Thal, D., Bates, E., Thal, D. J., Pethick, S. J., Tomasello, M., Mervis, C. B., & Stiles, J. (1994). Variability in early communicative development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 59 (5, Serial No. 242). Doi: 10.2307/1166093CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ganger, J., & Brent, M. R. (2004). Re-examining the vocabulary spurt. Developmental Psychology, 40, p.621–632. Doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.40.4.621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, W. S., Scholnick, E. K., & Hughes, A. T. (1987). Contextual constraints on usage of cognitive words. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 16, 289–310. Doi: 10.1007/BF01069284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Hoff, E. (2005). Language experience and language milestones during early childhood. In McCartney, K. and Phillips, D. (Eds.), Blackwood handbook of early childhood development (pp.232–251). New York: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hoff, E., & Naigles, L. (2002). How children use input to acquire a lexicon. Child Development, 73. 418–433. Doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00415CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huttenlocher, J., Haight, W., Bryk, A., Seltzer, M., & Lyons, T. (1991). Early vocabulary growth: Relation to language input and gender. Developmental Psychology, 27, 236–248. Doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.27.2.236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huttenlocher, J., Vasilyeva, M., Cymerman, E., & Levine, S. (2002). Language input and child syntax. Cognitive Psychology, 45, 337–374. Doi: 10.1016/S0010-0285(02)00500-5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirk, E., Pine, K., Wheatley, L., Howlett, N., Schulz, J., & Fletcher, B. C. (2015). A longitudinal investigation of the relationship between maternal mind-mindedness and theory of mind. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 33, 434–445. Doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12104CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Libertus, K., & Needham, A. (2011). Reaching experiences increases face preference in 3-month-old infants. Developmental Science, 14, 1355–1364. Doi: 10.111/j.1467-7687.2011.01084.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McHugh, M. L. (2012). Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica, 22, 276–282. Doi: 10.11613/BM.2012.031CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meltzoff, A. N., & Brooks, R. (2007). Eyes wide shut: The importance of eyes in infant gaze following and understanding other minds. In Flom, R., Lee, K., & Muir, D. (Eds.), Gaze following: Its development and significance (pp. 217–241). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Mintz, T. H. (2003). Frequent frames as a cue for grammatical categories in child directed speech. Cognition, 90, 91–117. Doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00140-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mundy, P., Block, J., Delgado, C., Pomares, Y., Van Hecke, A. V., & Parlade, M. V. (2007). Individual differences and the development of joint attention in infancy. Child Development, 78, 938–954. Doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01042.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelson, K. (1998). Language in cognitive development: Emergence of the mediated mind. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ruffman, T. (2014). To belief or not belief: Children's theory of mind. Developmental Review, 34, 265–293. Doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2014.04.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruffman, T., Puri, A., Galloway, O., Su, J., & Taumoepeau, M. (2018). Variety in parental use of “want” relates to subsequent growth in children's theory of mind. Developmental Psychology, 54, 677–688. Doi: 10.1037/dev0000459CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruffman, T., Slade, L., & Crowe, E. (2002). The relation between children's and mothers’ mental state language and theory-of-mind understanding. Child Development, 73, 734–751. Doi: 10.111/1467-8624.00435CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shatz, M., Wellman, H. M., & Silber, S. (1983). The acquisition of mental verbs: A systematic investigation of the first reference to mental state. Cognition, 14, 301- 321. Doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(83)90008-2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sullivan, J., & Barner, D. (2016). Discourse bootstrapping: Preschoolers use linguistic discourse to learn new words. Developmental Science, 19. 63–75. Doi: 10.1111/desc.12289CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tabachnik, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1989). Using multivariate statistics (2nd ed.). New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., & Bornstein, M. H. (2002). Maternal responsiveness and early language acquisition. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 29, 89–127. Doi: 10.1016/S0065-2407(02)80052-0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taumoepeau, M., & Reese, E. (2013). Maternal reminiscing, elaborative talk, and children's theory of mind: An intervention study. First Language, 33, 388–410. Doi: 10.1177/0142723713493347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taumoepeau, M., & Ruffman, T. (2006). Mother and infant talk about mental states relates to desire language and emotion understanding. Child Development, 77, 465–481. Doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00882.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taumoepeau, M., & Ruffman, T. (2008). Stepping stones to others’ minds: Maternal talk relates to child mental state language and emotion understanding at 15, 24, and 33 months. Child Development, 79. Doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01126.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tomasello, M., & Farrar, M. J. (1986). Joint attention and early language. Child Development, 57, 1454–1465. Doi: 10.2307/1130423CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yoshida, H., & Smith, L. B. (2008). What's in view for toddlers? Using a head camera to study visual experience. Infancy, 13, 229–248. Doi: 10.1080/15250000802004437CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yu, C., & Smith, L. B. (2012). Embodied attention and word learning by toddlers. Cognition, 125, 244–262. Doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.06.016CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed