Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T14:42:50.220Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ties between lexical and grammatical development: evidence from early-talkers*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Donna J. Thal ,
Elizabeth Bates ,
Mary Jane Zappia  and
Melinda Oroz
Donna J. Thal*
Affiliation:
San Diego State University
Elizabeth Bates
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego
Mary Jane Zappia
Affiliation:
San Diego State University
Melinda Oroz
Affiliation:
San Diego State University
*
Address for correspondence: Department of Communicative Disorders, San Diego State University, Developmental Psycholinguistics Lab, 6330 Alvarado Court, San Diego, CA, 92120, USA. email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Case studies are presented for two linguistically precocious children (early-talkers) aged 1;9 and 1;5, one of whom represents a striking dissociation between vocabulary size and mean length of utterance. Each early-talker is compared to controls in the same language stage; 10 in Early Stage I (mean age 1; 7) and 10 in Stage II (mean age 2; 3). Data are explored to determine if the dissociation is best characterized as one between grammar and semantics, or a difference in cognitive style. Results showed that the child who used mostly single words produced high proportions of predicates and bound and closed class grammatical morphemes, providing no evidence of a dissociation between grammar and semantics. Results also failed to support a clear contrast between analytic and holistic processing, although partial support was found for some predictions based on cognitive style. A unifying account is proposed that considers differences in auditory short term memory, a factor which could affect the size of the linguistic unit that children can store, manipulate, and/or retrieve at a particular point in development.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 23 , Issue 2 , June 1996 , pp. 349 - 368
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[*]

This work was supported in part by NIH grants number DC00482, DC00089, GM45765, and DC01289, and by a grant from the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation.

References

REFERENCES

Aram, D. (1988). Language sequelae of unilateral brain lesions in children. In Plum, F. (ed.), Language, communication, and the brain. New York: Raven Press.Google Scholar
Bates, E., Beeghly, M., Bretherton, I., McNew, S., O'Connell, B., Reznick, J., Shore, C., Snyder, L. & Volterra, V. (1986). Early Language Inventory. Unpublished test.Google Scholar
Bates, E., Bretherton, I. & Snyder, L. (1988). From first words to grammar: individual differences and dissociable mechanisms. New York: CUP.Google Scholar
Bates, E., Thal, D. & Janowsky, J. (1992). Early language development and its neural correlates. In Rapin, I. & Segalowitz, S. (eds), Handbook of neuropsyetiology. Vol. 7. Child neurology. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Bates, E., Dale, P. & Thal, D. (1994 a). Individual differences and their implications for theories of language development. In Fletcher, P. & MacWhinney, B. (eds), Handbook of child language. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bates, E., Thal, D., Aram, D., Eisele, J., Nass, R. & Trauner, D. (1994 b). From first words to grammar in children with focal brain injury. Project in Cognitive and Neural Development, Technical Report No. 94CND93O5 and in D. Thal & J. Reilly (eds), Special issue on Origins of Communication Disorders. Developmental Neuropsychology (under review).Google Scholar
Brown, R. (1973). A first language: the early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, R. (1993). Longitudinal change in language production of children and adolescents with Down syndrome. Paper presented at the Sixth International Congress for the Study of Child Language, Trieste, Italy, July.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of language: its nature, origin, and use. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Dale, P. (1991). The validity of a parent report measure of vocabulary and syntax at 24 months. Journal of Speech and Hearing Sciences 34, 565–71.Google ScholarPubMed
Dale, P., Bates, E., Reznick, S. & Morisset, C. (1989). The validity of a parent report instrument of child language at 20 months. Journal of Child Language 16, 239–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dale, P. & Cole, K. (1991). What's normal? Specific language impairment in an individual difference perspective. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in the Schools 22, 80–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dale, P. & Robinson, N. (1988). Linguistic precocity, cognition, and development. Paper presented at the Sixth Biennial Meeting of the International Conference on Infant Studies, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Fenson, L., Dale, P., Reznick, J. S., Thal, D., Bates, E., Hartung, J., Pethick, S. & Reilly, J. (1993). MacArthur Communicative Development Inventories: user's guide and technical manual. San Diego: Singular Publishing.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, A. (1993). Phonological limits on reading and memory in young adults with Down syndrome. Paper presented at the Sixth International Congress for the Study of Child Language, Trieste, Italy, July.Google Scholar
Horgan, D. (1981). Rate of language acquisition and noun emphasis. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 10, 629–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, J. & Kamhi, A. (1984). Syntactic and semantic aspects of the utterances of language-impaired children: the same can be less. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 30, 65–85.Google Scholar
Loeb, D. & Schwartz, R. (1990). Language characteristics of a linguistically precocious child. First Language 10, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchman, V. & Bates, E. (1994). Continuity in lexical and morphological development: a test of the critical mass hypothesis. Journal of Child Language 21, 339–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mervis, C. & Johnson, K. (1991). Acquisition of the plural morpheme: a case study. Developmental Psychology 27, 222–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, J. (1988). The developmental asynchrony of language development in children with Down syndrome. In Nadal, L. (ed.), The psychobiology of Down syndrome. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Miller, J. & Chapman, R. (1981). Assessing language production in children. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Munson, J. & Ingram, D. (1985). Morphology before syntax: a case study from language acquisition. Journal of Child Language 12, 681–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, K. (1989). Narratives from the crib. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Oroz, M., Cleveland, S. & Thal, D. (1993). Lexical and grammatical development in late-talking toddlers at one-year follow-up. Poster presented at the annual conference of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Anaheim, CA.Google Scholar
Paul, R. (1991). Profiles of toddlers with slow expressive language development. Topics in Language Disorders II, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, A. (1977). Language-learning strategies: does the whole equal the sum of the parts? Language 53, 560–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, A. (1983). The units of language acquisition. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Peters, A. (1995). Language typology, prosody, and the acquisition of grammatical morphemes. In Slobin, D. (ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, Volume 4. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (1984). Language learnability and language development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Plunkett, K. & Marchman, V. (1991). U-shaped learning and frequency effects in a multi-layered perceptron: implications for child language acquisition. Cognition 38, 43–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plunkett, K. & Marchman, V. (1993). From rote learning to system building: acquiring verb morphology in children and connectionist nets. Cognition 48, 21–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rescorla, L. (1989). The Language Development Survey: a screening tool for delayed language in toddlers. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 54, 587–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rescorla, L. & Schwartz, E. (1990). Outcome of toddlers with specific expressive language delay. Applied Psycholinguistics 11, 393–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, N., Dale, P. & Landesman, S. (1990). Validity of Stanford-Binet IV with linguistically precocious toddlers. Intelligence 14, 173–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savage-Rumbaugh, S., Murphy, J., Sevcik, R., Brakke, K., Williams, S. & Rumbaugh, D. (1993). Language comprehension in ape and child. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 58 (Serial No. 233).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singer, N., Bellugi, U., Bates, E., Jones, W. & Rossen, M. (1994). Contrasting profiles of language development in children with Williams and Down syndromes. Project in Cognitive and Neural Development Technical Report No. 94–03, Center for Research in Language, University of California, San Diego and under review. Developmental Neuropsychology.Google Scholar
Thal, D. & Bates, E. (1988). Language and gesture in late talkers. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 31, 115–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thal, D., Bates, E. & Bellugi, U. (1989). Language and cognition in two children with Williams syndrome. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 3, 489–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thal, D., Marchman, V., Stiles, J., Aram, D., Trauner, D., Nass, R. & Bates, E. (1991 a). Early lexical development in children with focal brain injury. Brain and Language 40, 491–527.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thal, D., Oroz, M. & McCaw, V. (in press). Phonological and lexical development in normal and late-talking toddlers. Applied Psycholinguistics.Google Scholar
Thal, D. & Tobias, S. (1994). Relationships between language and gesture in normally developing and late-talking toddlers. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 37, 157–70.Google ScholarPubMed
Thal, D., Tobias, S. & Morrison, D. (1991 b). Language and gesture in late talkers: a one year follow-up. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 34, 604–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vihman, M., Ferguson, C. & Elbert, M. (1986). Phonological development from babbling to speech: common tendencies and individual differences. Applied Psycholinguistics 7, 3–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, P. & Bellugi, U. (1994). Evidence from two genetic syndromes for a dissociation between verbal and visual short-term memory. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 16, 317–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehurst, G., Fischel, J., Arnold, D. & Lonigan, C. (1992). Evaluating outcomes with children with expressive language delay. In Warren, S. & Reichle, J. (eds), Causes and effects in communication and language intervention. Baltimore: Paul Brookes.Google Scholar