Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T04:09:58.089Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Syntactic–semantic interface in the acquisition of verb morphology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 February 2004

RICHARD M. WEIST
Affiliation:
SUNY College at Fredonia
ALEKSANDRA PAWLAK
Affiliation:
Lektor: International House
JENELL CARAPELLA
Affiliation:
SUNY College at Fredonia

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to show how the syntactic and semantic components of the tense–aspect system interact during the acquisition process. Our methodology involved: (1) identifying predicates, (2) finding the initial occurrence of their tense–aspect morphology, and (3) observing the emergence of contrasts. Six children learning Polish and six children learning English, found in the CHILDES archives, were investigated. The average starting age of the children learning English was 1;11, and 1;8 for the children learning Polish. In the first analysis, we traced the same 12 verbs in both languages, and in the second analysis, we contrasted the acquisition patterns for a set of telic versus atelic predicates. We tracked the verbs/predicates from the starting age to 4;11 or the child's final transcript. In English, progressive aspect is the marked form, and in Polish, perfective aspect is the marked form. This typological distinction has a significant effect of the acquisition patterns in the two languages. We argue that children acquire a multi-dimensional system having deictic relations as one of the basic dimensions. This process can be best understood within a functional theoretical framework having a well-defined syntactic–semantic interface.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2004 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The research was supported by NSF grant # BCS-0091702. Papers regarding the research were presented at the 2001 ZAS Conference on the Acquisition of verb grammar and verb arguments in Berlin and the 2002 joint IASCL/SRCLD meeting in Madison, WI. We would like to thank Karen Hoffman, Audra Montgomery, and Ryan Peterson for their contribution to data analysis.