Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T05:23:15.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Syllables and inflectional morphemes in early Finnish readers: evidence from eye-movements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2018

Tuomo HÄIKIÖ Open the ORCID record for Tuomo HÄIKIÖ [Opens in a new window]  and
Seppo VAINIO
Tuomo HÄIKIÖ*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Turku
Seppo VAINIO
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Turku
*
*Corresponding author: Tuomo Häikiö, Department of Psychology, University of Turku, FIN-20014 Turku, Finland. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Finnish is a language with simple syllable structure but rich morphology. It was investigated whether syllables or morphemes are preferred processing units in early reading. To this end, Finnish first- and second-grade children read sentences with embedded inflected target words while their eye-movements were registered. The target words were either in essive or inessive/adessive (i.e., locative) case. The target words were either non-hyphenated, or had syllable-congruent or syllable-incongruent hyphenation. For the locatives, the syllable-incongruent hyphenation coincided with the morpheme boundary, but this was not the case for the essives. It was shown that the second-graders were slowed down by hyphenation to a larger extent than first-graders. However, there was no slowdown in gaze duration for either age group when the syllable-incongruent hyphen was morpheme-congruent. These findings suggest that Finnish readers already utilize morpheme-level information during the first grade.

Keywords

syllablesmorphemesreading development
Type
Brief Research Reports
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 45 , Issue 5 , September 2018 , pp. 1227 - 1245
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48.Google Scholar
Bertram, R., Laine, M., & Karvinen, K. (1999). The interplay of word formation type, affixal homonymy, and productivity in lexical processing: evidence from a morphologically rich language. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28, 213–26.Google Scholar
Colé, P., Bouton, S., Leuwers, C., Casalis, S., & Sprenger-Charolles, L. (2012). Stem and derivational-suffix processing during reading by French second and third graders. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33, 97–120.Google Scholar
Colé, P., Magnan, A., & Grainger, J. (1999). Syllable-sized units in visual word recognition: evidence from skilled and beginning readers. Applied Psycholinguistics, 20, 507–32.Google Scholar
Ehri, L. C. (1995). Phases of development in learning to read by sight. Journal of Research in Reading, 18, 116–25.Google Scholar
Ehri, L. C. (2005). Learning to read words: theory, findings, and issues. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9, 167–88.Google Scholar
Ehri, L. C., & McCormick, S. (1998). Phases of word learning: implications for instruction with delayed and disabled readers. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 14, 135–63.Google Scholar
Frith, U. (1985). Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia. In Patterson, K., Marshall, J., & Coltheart, M. (Eds.), Surface dyslexia: neuropsychological and cognitive studies of phonological reading (pp. 301–30). London: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Grainger, J., Lété, B., Bertand, D., Dufau, S., & Ziegler, J. C. (2012). Evidence for multiple routes in learning to read. Cognition, 123, 280–92.Google Scholar
Grainger, J., & Ziegler, J. C. (2011). A dual-route approach to orthographic processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 2:54. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00054Google Scholar
Häikiö, T., Bertram, R., & Hyönä, J. (2011). The development of whole-word representations in compound word processing: evidence from eye fixation patterns of elementary school children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32, 533–51.Google Scholar
Häikiö, T., Bertram, R., & Hyönä, J. (2016). The hyphen as a syllabification cue in reading bisyllabic and multisyllabic words among Finnish 1st and 2nd graders. Reading and Writing, 29, 159–82.Google Scholar
Häikiö, T., Hyönä, J., & Bertram, R. (2015). The role of syllables in word recognition among beginning Finnish readers: evidence from eye movements during reading. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 27, 562–77.Google Scholar
Hasenäcker, J., & Schroeder, S. (2017). Syllables and morphemes in German reading development: evidence from second graders, fourth graders, and adults. Applied Psycholinguistics, 38, 733–53.Google Scholar
Hothorn, T., Bretz, F., & Westfall, P. (2008). Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biometric Journal, 50, 346–63.Google Scholar
Karlsson, F., & Koskenniemi, K. (1985). A process model of morphology and lexicon. Folia Linguistica, 29, 207–31.Google Scholar
Kirjavainen, M., & Lieven, E. (2011). Acquisition of relative cause in Finnish. In Kidd, E. (Ed.), The acquisition of relative clauses: functional and typological perspectives (pp. 107–39). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Laine, M., & Virtanen, P. (1999). WordMill lexical search program. University of Turku, Center for Cognitive Neuroscience.Google Scholar
Lázaro, M., Acha, J., de la Rosa, S., García, S., & Sainz, J. (2017). Exploring the derivative suffix frequency effect in Spanish speaking children. Reading and Writing, 30, 163–85. doi:10.1007/s11145-016-9668-2.Google Scholar
Maïonchi-Pino, N., Magnan, A., & Écalle, J. (2010). Syllable frequency effects in visual word recognition: developmental approach in French children. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 31, 70–82.Google Scholar
Quémart, P., Casalis, S., & Duncan, L. G. (2012). Exploring the role of bases and suffixes when reading familiar and unfamiliar words: evidence from French young readers. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16, 424–42.Google Scholar
R Core Team (2017). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from <https://www.R-project.org/>..>Google Scholar
Tiffin-Richards, S. P., & Schroeder, S. (2015). Children's and adults’ parafoveal processes in German: phonological and orthographic effects. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 27, 531–48.Google Scholar