We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
REFERENCES
Anderson, J. (1983). A.C.T.Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Caramazza, A. & Gupta, S. (1979). The roles of topicalization, parallel function and verb semantics in the interpretation of pronouns. Linguistics17. 497–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, K. W. (1980). A theory of cognitive development: the control and construction of hierarchies of skills. PsychRev87. 477–525.Google Scholar
Hopmann, M. R. & Maratsos, M. (1978). A developmental study of factivity and negation in complex syntax. JChLang5. 295–310.Google Scholar
Hopper, P. H. & Thompson, S. A. (1980). Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Lg56. 251–99.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (1975). Rules, rote, and analogy in morphological formations by Hungarian children. JChLang2. 65–77.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (1982). Basic syntactic processes. In Kuczaj, S. (ed.), Language acquisition: syntax and semantics. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Maratsos, M. & Kuczaj, S. A.II. (1978). Against the transformationalist account: a simpler analysis of auxiliary overmarkings. JChLang5. 337–45.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1967). The psychology of intelligence. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Sheldon, A. (1974). On the role of parallel function in the acquisition of relative clauses in English. JVLVB13. 272–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wanner, E. & Maratsos, M. (1978). An ATN approach to comprehension. In Halle, M.,Bresnan, J. &Miller, G. (eds), Linguistic theory and psychological reality. Cambridge, Mass.:M.I.T.Google Scholar