Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:24:18.031Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Spanish copula selection with adjectives at age three

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 August 2020

Pablo E. REQUENA Open the ORCID record for Pablo E. REQUENA [Opens in a new window]
Pablo E. REQUENA*
Affiliation:
The University of Texas at San Antonio, USA
*
*Corresponding author: Department of Modern Languages and Literatures McKinney Humanities Building 4.01.14 1 UTSA Circle, San Antonio, TX 78249 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Previous comprehension studies using Picture Matching Tasks (PMT) have shown that, by the age of four, Spanish-speaking children have acquired the semantics of estar being able to calculate the implicature that a property introduced with estar does not hold independent of time as well as displaying some ability to integrate discourse information about properties that change in the course of a story. This study extends that line of research to children under the age of four. Thirty-eight monolingual Spanish-speaking children were tested in two PMTs. The results show that at age three children differ from older children in their interpretation of the copulas suggesting that the distinction between ser and estar with adjectives emerges between the ages of three and four.

Keywords

serestarcopulaSpanishaspect
Type
Brief Research Report
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 48 , Issue 3 , May 2021 , pp. 621 - 633
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arche, M. J., Fábregas, A., & Marín, R. (2017). ‘Towards a unified treatment of Spanish copulas’, Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 11: Selected Papers from the 44th Linguistics Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), pp.33–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, M. (2002). The development of the copula in child English: The lightness of be. Annual review of language acquisition, 2(1), 37–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bel, A. (2013). Omisión y selección de la cópula en el desarrollo del lenguaje. Revista española de lingüística, 43(2), 63–90.Google Scholar
Bohn, M., & Frank, M. C. (2019, June 17). The pervasive role of pragmatics in early language. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/v8e56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Harvard U. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camacho, J. (2012). ‘Ser’ and ‘estar’: the Individual / Stage-level distinction and aspectual predication, in Hualde, J. I., Olarrea, A. & O'Rourke, E. (eds.), The Handbook of Hispanic Linguistics. Malden, Blackwell, pp. 453–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, G. (1977). Reference to kinds in English. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
De Villiers, J. G., & De Villiers, P. A. (1973). A cross-sectional study of the acquisition of grammatical morphemes in child speech. Journal of psycholinguistic research, 2(3), 267–278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Espinosa-Ochoa, M. R. (2019). The Spanish Verbs Estar (To Be) and Ser (To Be) in Child-Directed Speech. Psychology of Language and Communication, 23(1), 162–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fábregas, A. (2012). A guide to IL and SL in Spanish: Properties, problems, and proposals. Borealis 1(2). 1–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernández Leborans, M. J. (1995). Las construcciones con el verbo estar: aspectos sintácticos y semánticos. Verba 22, 253–284.Google Scholar
Gallego, Á., & Uriagereka, J. (2009). Estar = Ser + P. Paper presented at the 19th Colloquium on Generative Grammar, Vitoria.Google Scholar
Geeslin, K. L., & Guijarro-Fuentes, P. (2008). Variation in contemporary Spanish: Linguistic predictors of estar in four cases of language contact. Bilingualism: Language and cognition, 11(3), 365–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holtheuer, C. (2011). The distribution of ser and estar with adjectives: A critical survey. Revista Signos, 44(75), 33–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holtheuer, C. (2013). El uso del input en la adquisición de las cópulas Ser y Estar con adjetivos en el español infantil. RLA. Revista de lingüística teórica y aplicada, 51(2), 29–47.Google Scholar
Holtheuer, C., Miller, K., & Schmitt, C. (2011). Ser and Estar: The role of adjective-types. Proceedings of the Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition in North America (GALANA-4), 90–105.Google Scholar
Krämer, I. (2000). Interpreting indefinites: An experimental study of children's language comprehension (Doctoral dissertation, University of Utrecht Utrecht).Google Scholar
Maienborn, C. (2005). A discourse-based account of Spanish ‘ser’ / ‘estar’. Linguistics 43, pp. 155–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Requena, P. E., Román-Hernández, A. I., & Miller, K. (2015). Children's Knowledge of the Spanish Copulas ser and estar with Novel Adjectives. Language Acquisition, 22(2), 193–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, C. (1992). Ser and estar: a matter of aspect. In: Proceedings of Northeeastern Linguistic Society, vol. 22, GLSA, Amherst, MA, pp. 411–425.Google Scholar
Schmitt, C. (1996). Aspect and the syntax of noun phrases. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Maryland, College Park.Google Scholar
Schmitt, C., & Miller, K. (2007). Making discourse-dependent decisions: The case of the copulas ser and estar in Spanish. Lingua, 117(11), 1907–1929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sera, M. D. (1992). To be or to be: Use and acquisition of the Spanish copulas. Journal of Memory and Language, 31(3), 408–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, C. (1986). Bilingualism and language change: The extension of estar in Los Angeles Spanish. Language, 62(3), 587–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, C., & Montanari, S. (2008). The acquisition of ser, estar (and be) by a Spanish–English bilingual child: The early stages. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11(3), 341–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, E. A., Redfern, A., & Oleson, J. J. (2019). Linear mixed-model analysis to examine longitudinal trajectories in vocabulary depth and breadth in children who are hard of hearing. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 62(3), 525–542.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Requena Supplementary Materials

Requena Supplementary Materials

Download Requena Supplementary Materials(File)
File 1.3 MB