Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T13:06:52.816Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sensitive periods and language in cochlear implant users*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 February 2016

IGNACIO MORENO-TORRES ,
SONIA MADRID-CÁNOVAS  and
GEMA BLANCO-MONTAÑEZ
IGNACIO MORENO-TORRES*
Affiliation:
Universidad de Málaga
SONIA MADRID-CÁNOVAS
Affiliation:
Universidad de Murcia
GEMA BLANCO-MONTAÑEZ
Affiliation:
Universidad San Pablo Andalucía CEU
*
Address for correspondence: Ignacio Moreno-Torres, Universidad de Málaga – Filología Española II y Teoría de la Literatura, Campus de Teatinos s/n Málaga 29018, Spain. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study explores the hypothesis that the existence of a short sensitive period for lower-level speech perception/articulation skills, and a long one for higher-level language skills, may partly explain the language outcomes of children with cochlear implants (CIs). The participants were fourteen children fitted with a CI before their second birthday. Data about their language skills and the environmental conditions (e.g. Family Involvement in rehabilitation) were obtained over a period of three years. Age at implantation correlated exclusively with the ratio of errors of place of articulation, a phonological feature for which CIs provide insufficient information. The degree of Family Involvement was significantly correlated with the remaining language measures. We conclude that small plasticity reductions affecting lower-level skills may partly explain the difficulties of some CI users in developing language.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 43 , Issue 3: Age Effects in Child Language Acquisition , May 2016 , pp. 479 - 504
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[*]

This work was supported by a grant from the Spanish Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (FFI FFI2012-32101). The authors would like to thank Esther Moruno-López for her help with collecting and analyzing the data. We are most grateful to the children and the families who participated in this study.

References

REFERENCES

Boersma, P. & Weenink, D. (2010). Praat: doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.1) [Computer program]. Online: <http://www.praat.org> (last accessed 31 January 2010).+(last+accessed+31+January+2010).>Google Scholar
Bouton, S., Serniclaes, W., Bertoncini, J. & Cole, P. (2012). Perception of speech features by French-speaking children with Cochlear Implants. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 55, 139–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caselli, M. C., Rinaldi, P., Varuzza, C., Giuliani, A. & Burdo, S. (2012). Cochlear implant in the second year of life: lexical and grammatical outcomes. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 55, 382–94.Google ScholarPubMed
Colletti, L., Mandala, M., Zoccante, L., Shannon, R. V. & Colletti, V. (2011). Infants versus older children fitted with cochlear implants: performance over 10 years. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology 75, 504–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coninx, F., Weichbold., V., Tsiakpini, L., Autrique, E., Bescond, G., Tamas, L. & Brachmaier, J. (2009). Validation of the LittlEARS® Auditory Questionnaire in children with normal hearing. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology 73, 1761–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Conti-Ramsden, G., Botting, N. & Faragher, B. (2001). Psycholinguistic markers for Specific Language Impairment (SLI). Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 42, 741–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Conway, C. M., Karpicke, J., Anaya, E. M., Henning, S. C., Kronenberger, G. & Pisoni, D. B. (2011). Nonverbal cognition in deaf children following cochlear implantation: motor sequencing disturbances mediate language delays. Developmental Neuropsychology 36, 237–54.Google ScholarPubMed
Dettman, S. J., Pinder, D., Briggs, R. J. S., Dowell, R. C. & Leigh, J. R. (2007). Communication development in children who receive the cochlear implant younger than12 months: risks versus benefits. Ear & Hearing 28, 11S–8S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ertmer, D. J. & Mellon, J. A. (2001). Beginning to talk at 20 months: early vocal development in a young cochlear implant recipient. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 44, 192–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frederici, A. (2012). The cortical language circuit: from auditory perception to sentence comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 16, 262–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geers, A. E., Moog, J. S., Biedenstein, J., Brenner, C. & Hayes, H. (2009). Spoken language scores of children using cochlear implants compared to hearing age-mates at school entry. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 14, 371–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gillis, S., Schauwers, K. & Govaerts, P. J. (2002). Babbling milestones and beyond: early speech development in CI children. Antwerp Papers in Linguistics 102, 23–39.Google Scholar
Hammer, A. (2010). The acquisition of verbal morphology in cochlear-implanted and specific language impaired children. PhD dissertation, University of Leiden, Utrecht, the Netherlands, LOT.Google Scholar
Hickok, G. (2012). Computational neuroanatomy of speech production. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 13, 135–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hickok, G. & Poeppel, D. (2004). Dorsal and ventral streams: a framework for understanding aspects of the functional anatomy of language. Cognition 92, 67–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hickok, G. & Poeppel, D. (2007). The cortical organization of speech processing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 8, 393–402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hicks, C. B. & Tharpe, A. M. (2002). Listening effort and fatigue in school-age children with and without hearing loss. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 45, 573–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horn, D. L., Pisoni, D. B., Sanders, M. & Miyamoto, R. T. (2005). Behavioral assessment of pre-lingually deaf children before cochlear implantation. Laryngoscope 115, 1603–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houston, D. & Miyamoto, R. T. (2010). Effects of early auditory experience on word learning and speech perception in deaf children with cochlear implants: implications for sensitive periods of language development. Otology and Neurotology 31(8), 1248–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huang, B. H. (2014). The effects of age on second language grammar and speech production. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 43, 397–442.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, E. G. (2000). Cortical and subcortical contributions to activity-dependent plasticity in primate somatosensory cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience 23, 1–37.Google ScholarPubMed
Knudsen, E. I. (2004). Sensitive periods in the development of the brain and behaviour. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 16(8), 1412–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazard, D. S., Lee, H. J., Gaebler, M., Kell, C. A., Truy, E. & Giraud, A. L. (2010). Phonological processing in post-lingual deafness and cochlear implant outcome. NeuroImage 4, 3443–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Normand, M. T. & Moreno-Torres, I. (2014). The role of linguistic and environmental factors on grammatical development in French children with cochlear implants. Lingua 139, 26–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leigh, J., Dettman, S., Dowell, S. & Briggs, R. (2013). Communication development in children who receive a cochlear implant by 12 months of age. Otology & Neurotology 34, 443–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Locke, J. L. (1997). A theory of neurolinguistic development. Brain and Language 58, 265–326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loizou, P. (2006). Speech processing in vocoder-centric cochlear implants. In Moller, A. (ed.), Cochlear and brainstem implants: advances in otorhinolaryngology, 109–43. Basel: Karger.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
López-Ornat, S., Gallego, C., Gallo, P., Karousou, A., Mariscal, S. & Martínez, M. (2005). Inventarios de Desarrollo Comunicativo MacArthur: Manual Técnico y Cuadernillos. Madrid: Ediciones TEA [in Spanish].Google Scholar
Markman, T. M., Quittner, A. L., Eisenberg, L. S., Tobey, E. A., Thal, D., Niparko, J. K. & Wang, N. Y. (2011). Language development after cochlear implantation: an epigenetic model. Journal of Neurodevelopment Disorders 3, 388–404.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McConkey Robbins, A., Koch, D. B., Osberger, M. J., Zimmerman-Phillips, S. & Kishon-Rabin, L. (2004). Effect of age at cochlear implantation on auditory skill development in infants and toddlers. Archives of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery 130, 570–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Medina, V. & Serniclaes, W. (2009). Consecuencias de la categorización fonológica sobre la lectura silenciosa de niños sordos con implante coclear. Revista de Logopedia, Foniatría y Audiología 29, 186–94 [in Spanish].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moeller, M. P. (2001). Early intervention and language development in children who are deaf and hard of hearing. Pediatrics 106, 1–9.Google Scholar
Moreno-Torres, I. (2014). The emergence of productive speech and language in Spanish-learning paediatric cochlear implant users. Journal of Child Language 41, 575–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moreno-Torres, I., Madrid-Cánovas, S. & Moruno-López, S. (2013). Prueba repetición de oraciones para niños de 24 a 48 meses (PRO-24). Estudio piloto con niños típicos y niños sordos con implante coclear. Revista de Logopedia, Foniatría y Audiología 33, 25–35 [in Spanish]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreno-Torres, I. & Moruno-López, E. (2014). Segmental and suprasegmental errors in Spanish learning Cochlear Implant users: neurolinguistic interpretation. Journal of Neurolinguistics 31, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreno-Torres, I. & Torres, S. (2008). From 1 word to 2 words with cochlear implant and cued speech: a case study. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 22, 491–508.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peters, R., Moore, B. & Baer, T. (1998). Speech reception thresholds in noise with and without spectral and temporal dips for hearing-impaired and normally hearing people. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America 103, 577–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pulvermuller, F. (2005). Brain mechanisms linking language and action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 6(7), 576–82.Google ScholarPubMed
Punch, R. & Hyde, M. (2011) Social participation of children and adolescents with cochlear implants: a qualitative analysis of parent, teacher, and child interviews. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 16, 474–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quittner, A. L., Cruz, I., Barker, D. H., Tobey, E., Eisenberg, L. S., Niparko, J. K. (2013). Effects of maternal sensitivity and cognitive and linguistic stimulation on cochlear implant users’ language development over four years. Journal of Pediatrics 162(2), 343–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rose, Y., Hedlund, G. J., Byrne, R., Wareham, T. & MacWhinney, B. (2007). Phon 1·2: a computational basis for phonological database elaboration and model testing. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Cognitive Aspects of Computational Language Acquisition, 17–24. Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
Rosen, S. (1992). Temporal information in speech: acoustic, auditory and linguistic aspects. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B336, 367–73.Google Scholar
Sharma, A., Dorman, M. & Spahr, A. (2002). A sensitive period for the development of the central auditory system in children with cochlear implants: implications for age of implantation. Ear and Hearing 23, 532–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shriberg, L. D., Fourakis, M., Hall, S. D., Karlsson, H. B., Lohmeier, H. L., McSweeny, J. L. & Wilson, D. L. (2010). Perceptual and acoustic reliability estimates for the Speech Disorders Classification System (SDCS). Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 24, 825–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Szagun, G. (2004). Learning by ear: on the acquisition of case and gender marking by German-speaking children with normal hearing and with cochlear implants. Journal of Child Language 31, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Szagun, G. & Stumper, B. (2012). Age or experience? The influence of age at implantation, social and linguistic environment on language development in children with cochlear implants. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 55, 1640–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tye-Murray, N., Spencer, L. & Woodworth, G. G. (1995). Acquisition of speech by children who have prolonged cochlear implant experience. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 38, 327–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vonen, A. M. (2007). Bilingualism—a future asset in the education of socially deaf children. In Hyde, M. & Hoie, G. (eds), Constructing educational discourses on deafness, 108–18. Oslo: Norwegian Government Printers, Skadalen Resource Centre.Google Scholar
Warner-Czyz, A. D., Davis, B. L. & MacNeilage, P. F. (2010). Accuracy of consonant–vowel syllables in young cochlear implant recipients and hearing children in the single-word period. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 53, 2–17.Google ScholarPubMed