Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T23:05:14.657Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Semantic roles and residual grammatical categories in mother and child speech: who tunes into whom?*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Kristine S. Retherford ,
Bonnie C. Schwartz  and
Robin S. Chapman
Kristine S. Retherford
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin–Madison
Bonnie C. Schwartz
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin–Madison
Robin S. Chapman
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin–Madison
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Mother and child speech in two half-hour free play conversations of six pairs were analysed for 15 semantic roles such as AGENT and ACTION, and five additional syntactic categories such as negation. Children were taped at the beginning of word combinations (1; 7–2; 0) and again 3 to 6 months later. Mothers and children were similar to one another in the relative frequency with which they used the different semantic and syntactic categories. However, the mothers' use was stable, including a larger number of categories than the children and showing few shifts in relative frequency. Insofar as changes took place over time, it was the children who changed to become more like their mothers, both in the semantic roles present and in their relative frequency of use. These findings are interpreted as evidence against a Fine-Tuning Hypothesis to explain the content of mothers' speech to children. The role of discourse topic restrictions in limiting the distribution of semantic roles is discussed.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 8 , Issue 3 , October 1981 , pp. 583 - 607
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arlman-Rupp, A., Van Niekerk De Haan, D. & Van De Sandt-Koenderman, M. (1976). Brown's early stages: some evidence from Dutch. JChLang 3. 267–74.Google Scholar
Bloom, L. (1973). One word at a time: the use of single word utterances before syntax. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Bloom, L., Miller, P. & Hood, L. (1975). Variation and reduction as aspects of competence in language development. In Pick, A. D. (ed.), Minnesota symposium on child psychology. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Bowerman, M. (1973). Early syntactic development. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Bowerman, M. (1976). Semantic factors in the acquisition of rules for word use and sentence construction. In Morehead, D. M. & Morehead, A. E. (eds), Normal and deficient child language. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Braine, M. D. S. (1976). Children's first word combinations. Monogr. Soc. Res. Ch. Devel., Serial No. 164.Google Scholar
Brown, R. (1970). Psycholinguistics. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Brown, R. (1973). A first language. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cross, T. G. (1977). Mothers' speech adjustments: the contribution of selected childGoogle Scholar