Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:37:31.991Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Semantic bias in the acquisition of relative clauses in Japanese*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 June 2009

HIROMI OZEKI  and
YASUHIRO SHIRAI
HIROMI OZEKI*
Affiliation:
Reitaku University
YASUHIRO SHIRAI
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh
*
Address for correspondence: Hiromi Ozeki, College of Foreign Languages, Reitaku University, 2-1-1, Hikarigaoka, Kashiwa-shi, Chiba-ken, 277-8686, Japan. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study analyzes the acquisition of relative clauses in Japanese to determine the semantic and functional characteristics of children's relative clauses in spontaneous speech. Longitudinal data from five Japanese children are analyzed and compared with English data (Diessel & Tomasello, 2000). The results show that the relative clauses produced by Japanese children predominantly have stative/attributive predicates. Additionally, early relative clauses in Japanese are often used to identify a referent that is not present in the context of interaction. These findings contrast with Diessel & Tomasello's (2000) English data, and possible explanations include the input that children are exposed to, which reflects typological characteristics of noun modification in Japanese.

Type
Brief Research Report
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 37 , Issue 1 , January 2010 , pp. 197 - 215
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[*]

We thank Kevin Gregg, Wendy Martelle and the JCL reviewers for their helpful comments on the drafts of this paper. This research is part of the first author's doctoral dissertation submitted to Ochanomizu University (Ozeki, 2005). This paper is based on a paper presented at the 29th Boston University Conference on Language Development (5–7 November, 2004), and an earlier, shorter version has appeared in the proceedings. Travel to the conference was supported by a Paula Menyuk Travel Award from Boston University to the first author, and by a Humanities Research Grant from Cornell University and a Travel Grant from Shaw College, CUHK (The Chinese University of Hong Kong) to the second author. The writing of this paper was partially supported by a Direct Grant for Research from CUHK, a Grant-Aid for Scientific Research Program (Joint Research) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (Grant No. 18330141, PI-Susanne Miyata) and a graduate assistantship from the University of Pittsburgh.

References

REFERENCES

Andersen, R. W. & Shirai, Y. (1996). Primacy of aspect in first and second language acquisition: The pidgin/creole connection. In Ritchie, W. C. & Bhatia, T. K. (eds), Handbook of second language acquisition, 527–70. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Berman, R. A. & Slobin, D. I. (1994). Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Brandt, S., Diessel, H. & Tomasello, M. (2007). The acquisition of German relative clauses: A case study. Journal of Child Language 34, 1–24.Google Scholar
Comrie, B. (1996). The unity of noun-modifying clauses in Asian languages. Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Pan-Asiatic Linguistics, 1077–88. Thailand: Institute of Language and Culture for Rural Development, Mahidol University of Salaya.Google Scholar
Comrie, B. (1998). Attributive clauses in Asian languages: Towards an areal typology. In Boeder, W., Schroeder, C., Wagner, K. H. and Wildgen, W. (eds), Sprache in raum und zeit, in memoriam Johannes Bechert, Band 2, 51–60. Tubingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Comrie, B. (2002). Typology and language acquisition: The case of relative clauses. In Giacalone Ramat, A. (ed.), Typology and second language acquisition, 19–37. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Comrie, B. & Horie, K. (1995). Complement clauses versus relative clauses: Some Khmer evidence. In Abraham, W., Givón, T. & Thompson, S. A. (eds), Discourse grammar and typology: Papers in honor of John W. M. Verhaar, 65–75. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cziko, G. A. & Koda, K. (1987). A Japanese child's use of stative and punctual verbs. Journal of Child Language 14, 99–111.Google Scholar
Dasinger, L. & Toupin, C. (1994). The development of relative clause functions in narrative. In Berman, R. & Slobin, D. I. (eds), Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study, 457–514. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Diessel, H. (2004). The acquisition of complex sentences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diessel, H. & Tomasello, M. (2000). The development of relative clauses in spontaneous child speech. Cognitive Linguistics 11, 131–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diessel, H. & Tomasello, M. (2005). A new look at the acquisition of relative clauses. Language 81, 1–25.Google Scholar
Fernald, A. & Morikawa, H. (1993). Common themes and cultural variations in Japanese and American mothers' speech to infants. Child Development 64, 637–56.Google Scholar
Hakuta, K. (1981). Grammatical description versus configurational arrangement in language acquisition: The case of relative clauses in Japanese. Cognition 9, 197–236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jisa, H. & Kern, S. (1998). Relative clauses in French children's narrative texts. Journal of Child Language 25, 623–52.Google Scholar
Kato, S. (2003). Nihongo shuusyoku koozoo no goyooronteki kenkyuu [A pragmatic analysis of Japanese noun-modifying constructions]. Tokyo: Hitsuji Shoboo.Google Scholar
Keenan, E. (1985). Relative clauses. In Shopen, T. (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, Vol. II: Complex constructions, 141–70. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kim, Y.-J. (1987). The acquisition of relative clauses in English and Korean: Development in spontaneous production. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Kinsui, S. (1994). Rentai syuusyoku no ta ni tuite [On -ta in noun-modifying clauses]. In Takubo, Y. (ed.), Nihongo no meisi syuusyoku hyoogen [Noun modifying constructions in Japanese], 29–65. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Kokuritsu Kokugo Kenkyujo [National Insitute of Language Research] (1982 a). Yoozi no kotoba siryoo (3): Issaizi no kotoba no kiroku [Child language data (3): A record of language by a one-year-old]. Tokyo: Shuuei Shuppan.Google Scholar
Kokuritsu Kokugo Kenkyujo [National Insitute of Language Research] (1982 b). Yoozi no kotoba siryoo (4): Issaizi no kotoba no kiroku [Child language data (4): A record of language by a one-year-old]. Tokyo: Shuuei Shuppan.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, K. (1988). There was a farmer had a dog: Syntactic amalgams revised. Berkeley Linguistics Society 14, 319–39.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk, 3rd edn. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Y. (1988). Semantics and pragmatics of noun-modifying constructions in Japanese. Berkeley Linguistics Society 14, 166–75.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Y. (1997). Noun-modifying constructions in Japanese: A frame-semantic approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, S. & Yip, V. (2002). Relative clauses in early bilingual development: Transfer and universals. In Ramat, A. Giacalone (ed.), Typology and second language acquisition, 39–82. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Mayer, M. (1969). Frog, where are you? New York: Dial Books for Young Readers.Google Scholar
Miyata, S. (1992). Wh-questions of the third kind: The strange use of wa-questions in Japanese children. Bulletin of Aichi Shukutoku Junior College 31, 151–55.Google Scholar
Miyata, S. (1993). Japanische kinderfragen: Zum erwerb von form – inhalt – funktion von frageausdruecken. Hamburg: OAG.Google Scholar
Miyata, S. (1995). The AKI corpus: Longitudinal speech data of a Japanese boy aged 1 ; 6–2 ; 12. Bulletin of Aichi Shukutoku Junior College 34, 183–91.Google Scholar
Miyata, S. (2000). The TAI corpus: Longitudinal speech data of a Japanese boy aged 1 ; 5.20–3 ; 1.1. Bulletin of Aichi Shukutoku Junior College 39, 77–85.Google Scholar
Noji, J. (1973–77). Yooziki no gengo seekatu no zittai. I–IV [The language development of a child, Vol. 1–4]. Hiroshima: Bunka Hyooron.Google Scholar
Oshima-Takane, Y. & MacWhinney, B. (eds) (1998). CHILDES manual for Japanese, 2nd edn. Montreal, Canada, Nagoya, Japan: McGill University and Chukyo University.Google Scholar
Ozeki, H. (2004). Nihongo gakusyuusya no rentai syuusyoku koozoo syuutoku katei: Syuusyokusetu no zyootaisei no kanten kara [Does a modifier's stativity predict developmental sequence of noun-modifying construction in L2 Japanese?]. Nihongo Kyooiku [Journal of Japanese Language Teaching] 121, 36–45.Google Scholar
Ozeki, H. (2005). Daiiti daini gengo ni okeru nihongo meisi syuusyokusetu no syuutoku katei: Ruikeiron teki apurooti [The acquisition process of Japanese noun-modifying clauses by first and second language learners: A typological approach]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ochanomizu University, Tokyo.Google Scholar
Ozeki, H. & Shirai, Y. (2007 a). The consequences of variation in the acquisition of relative clauses: An analysis of longitudinal production data from five Japanese children. In Matsumoto, Y., Oshima, D. Y., Robinson, O. W. & Sells, P. (eds), Diversity in language: Perspectives and implications, 243–70. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Ozeki, H. & Shirai, Y. (2007 b). The acquisition of Japanese noun-modifying clauses: A comparison with Korean. In McGloin, N. & Mori, J. (eds), Japanese/Korean Linguistics, 15, 263–74. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications [Distributed by the University of Chicago Press].Google Scholar
Sheldon, A. (1974). On the role of parallel function in the acquisition of relative clauses in English. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 13, 272–81.Google Scholar
Shirai, Y. & Andersen, R. W. (1995). The acquisition of tense/aspect morphology: A prototype account. Language 71, 743–62.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1985). Crosslinguistic evidence for the language-making capacity. In Slobin, D. I. (ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition. Vol. 2: Theoretical issues, 1157–256. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1986). The acquisition and use of relative clauses in Turkic and Indo-European languages. In Slobin, D. I. & Zimmer, K. (eds), Studies in Turkish linguistics, 273–94. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Stephany, U. (1981). Verbal grammar in modern Greek early child language. In Dale, P. S. & Ingram, D. (eds), Child language: An international perspective, 45–57. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Takahashi, T. (1979). Rentai doosiku to meisi no kakawariai ni tuite no zyosetu [On the relationship between the noun-modifying clause and the head noun: An introduction], 75–172. In Kenkyuukai, Gengogaku (ed.), Gengo no kenkyuu [The study of language]. Tokyo: Mugi Shobo.Google Scholar
Teramura, H. (1970). The syntax of noun-modification in Japanese. The Journal of the Association of Teachers of Japanese Newsletter 6(1), 64–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teramura, H. (1975). Rentai syuusyoku no sintakusu to sono imi: 1 [Syntax and semantics of noun modification, No. 1]. Nihongo Nihonbunka 4, 71–119 [Osaka: Osaka University of Foreign Studies].Google Scholar
Teramura, H. (1980). Meisi syuusyoku-bu no hikaku [Comparison of noun modifiers]. In Kunihiro, T. (ed.), Nitieigo hikaku kooza (2): Bunpoo [Lectures on contrastive studies of Japanese and English (2): Grammar], 221–60. Tokyo: Taishuukan.Google Scholar
Teramura, H. (1984). Nihongo no sintakusu to imi, II [Syntax and semantics in Japanese, 2]. Tokyo: Kurosio Publihsers.Google Scholar