Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T03:02:22.215Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Semantic and cognitive development in 15- to 21-month-old children*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Alison Gopnik
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Andrew N. Meltzoff
Affiliation:
University of Washington

Abstract

Recent studies suggest a specific relationship between the acquisition of the word ‘gone’ and the development of the object concept. A longitudinal study investigated whether there is a similar relationship between the acquisition of words that encode success and failure, such as no, uh-oh and there, and the development of means–ends skills. A cross-sectional study investigated both these relationships. The results suggest that children acquire the word gone after they solve simple invisible displacement tasks but before they solve serial invisible displacement tasks. They also show that children acquire success/failure words after they use insight to solve the problem of the string but before they use insight to solve more difficult means–ends problems. These sequences cannot be explained in terms of age, general cognitive development or general linguistic development. It is argued that gone encodes a concept related to the concepts that underlie success on invisible displacement tasks, and that success/failure words encode concepts related to the concepts that underlie the development of insight. Children seem to acquire words that encode concepts they have just developed or are in the process of developing. These results suggest that there are strong and specific links between the acquisition of particular types of meanings and particular cognitive achievements. Several alternative explanations for these early links between semantic and conceptual development are proposed.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bates, E., Benigni, L., Bretherton, I., Camaioni, L. & Volterra, V. (1979). The emergence of symbols.. New YorkAcademic Press.Google Scholar
Bloom, L. (1973). One word at a time: the use of single word utterances before syntax. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Bower, T. G. R. (1974). Development in infancy. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
Brown, R. (1958). How shall a thing be called? PsycholRev 65. 1421.Google Scholar
Brown, R. (1973). A first language. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. S. (1973). Organization of early skilled action. ChDev 44. 111.Google Scholar
Corrigan, R. (1978). Language development as related to stage 6 object permanence development. JChLang 5. 173–89.Google Scholar
Gopnik, A. (1981). The development of non-nominal expressions in 12–24 month olds. In Dale, P. & Ingram, D. (eds), Child language: an international perspective. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Gopnik, A. (1982). Words and plans: early language and the development of intelligent action. JChLang 9. 308–18.Google Scholar
Gopnik, A. (1984). The acquisition of gone and the development of the object concept. JChLang 11. 273–92.Google Scholar
Gopnik, A. & Meltzoff, A. (in press a). From people to plans to objects: changes in the meanings of early words and their relation to cognitive development. JPrag.Google Scholar
Gopnik, A.(in press b). Words, plans, things and locations: interactions between semantic and cognitive development in the one-word stage. In Barrett, M. & Kuczaj, S. (eds), The development of word meaning. New York: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
McCune-Nicolich, L. (1981). The cognitive bases of relational words in the single-word period. JChLang 8. 1534.Google Scholar
Miller, J., Chapman, R., Branston, M. & Reichle, J. (1980). Language comprehension in sensorimotor stages V and VI. JSpHearRes 23. 284315.Google Scholar
Moore, K. & Meltzoff, A. (1978). Object permanence, imitation and language development. In Minifie, F. & Lloyd, L. (eds), Communicative and cognitive abilities. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Pea, R. (1980). The development of negation in early child language. In Olson, D. (ed.), The social foundations of language and thought. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1953). The origins of intelligence in the child. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1954). The child's construction of reality. New York: Basic Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piaget, J. (1962). Play, dreams and imitation in childhood. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Smolak, L. (1982). Cognitive precursors of receptive vs. expressive language. JChLang 9. 1322.Google Scholar
Uzgiris, I. & Hunt, J. (1975). Assessment in infancy. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T.Google Scholar