Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:16:58.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Segmental properties of input to infants: a study of Korean

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2008

SOYOUNG LEE ,
BARBARA L. DAVIS  and
PETER F. MACNEILAGE
SOYOUNG LEE*
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
BARBARA L. DAVIS
Affiliation:
The University of Texas at Austin
PETER F. MACNEILAGE
Affiliation:
The University of Texas at Austin
*
*Address for correspondence: Soyoung Lee, PhD, Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, PO BOX 413 Milwaukee, WI 53201. tel: 414-229-2838; fax: 414-229-2620; e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Segmental distributions of Korean infant-directed speech (IDS) and adult-directed speech (ADS) were compared. Significant differences were found in both consonant and vowel patterns. Korean-speaking mothers using IDS displayed more frequent labial consonantal place and less frequent coronal and glottal place and fricative manner. They showed more use of mid and low central vowels in IDS as well as more use of language-specific Korean phonemes. Mothers produced significantly more fortis and geminate and less lenis consonant phonemes in IDS than in ADS. Findings suggest that Korean mothers speaking to infants in the IDS speech style use sounds that more closely match infant production propensities as well as highlighting perceptually salient properties. IDS may serve to facilitate infant learning of ambient language phonological regularities.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 35 , Issue 3 , August 2008 , pp. 591 - 617
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beckman, M. E., Kiyoko, Y. & Edwards, J. (2003). Language-specific and language-universal aspects of lingual obstruent production in Japanese-acquiring children. Journal of the Phonetic Society of Japan 7(2), 18–28.Google Scholar
Boysson-Bardies, B., Halle, P., Sagart, L. & Durand, C. (1989). A cross-linguistic intervention of vowel formants in babbling. Journal of Child Language 16, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boysson-Bardies, B. & Vihman, M. M. (1991). Adaptation to language: evidence from babbling and first words in four languages. Language 67(2), 297–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cho, M.-H. (2002). Consonant harmony in child Korean: a comparison with child English. Japanese Korean Linguistics 11, 219–31.Google Scholar
Cho, T., Jun, S.-A. & Ladefoged, P. (2002). Acoustic and aerodynamic correlates of Korean stops and fricatives. Journal of Phonetics 30, 193–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, B. L. & MacNeilage, P. F. (1995). The articulatory basis of babbling. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 38, 1199–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, B. L.MacNeilage, P. F. & Matyear, C. (2002). Acquisition of serial complexity in speech production: a comparison of phonetic and phonological approaches to first word production. Phonetica 59, 75–107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferguson, C. A. (1977). Baby talk as a simplified register. In Snow, K. & Ferguson, C. A. (eds) Talking to children: language input and acquisition, 209–235. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fernald, A. (1992). Maternal vocalizations to infants as biologically relevant signals: an evolutionary perspective. In Barkow, J. H., Cosmides, L. & Tooby, J. (eds) The adapted mind: evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture, 391–428. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernald, A. & Morikawa, H. (1993). Common themes and cultural variations in Japanese and American mothers’ speech to infants. Child Development 64(3), 637–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fernald, A., Taeschner, T., Dunn, J., Papousek, M., Boysson-Bardies, B. & Fukui, I. (1989). A cross language study of prosodic modifications in mothers' and fathers' speech to preverbal infants. Journal of Child Language 16, 477–501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flexner, S. B. (1987). The Random House Dictionary of the English Language, 2nd ed.New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Hur, U. (1985). Korean phonology. Seoul, Korea: Sam Publisher.Google Scholar
Jin, N. (1993). A quantitative linguistic study on the functional load of phonemes in standard Korean. Speech 25, 65–91.Google Scholar
Jun, S.-A. (2006). Phonological development of Korean: a case study. In Kuno, S., Lee, I.-H., Whitman, J., Maling, J., Kang, Y.-S., Sells, P. & Sohn, H.-S. (eds) Harvard studies in Korean linguistics XI, page 17–33. Seoul, Korea: Hanshin Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Kent, R. D. (1992). The biology of phonological development. In Ferguson, C. A., Menn, L. & Stoel-Gammon, C. (eds) Phonological development: model, research, implications, 65–90. Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Lee, S. (2003). The phonetic basis of early speech acquisition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, the University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Lee, S. & Nakayama, M. (2000). Characteristics of maternal speech in Korean: do Korean and Japanese maternal speech show similar characteristics? Proceedings of the Annual Boston University Conference of Language Development 24, 486–97.Google Scholar
Levitt, A. G. & Aydelott-Utman, J. G. (1992). From babbling towards the sound systems of English and French: a longitudinal case study. Journal of Child Language 19, 19–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindblom, B. (1990). Explaining phonetic variation: a sketch of the H and H theory. In Hardcastle, W. J. & Marchal, A. (eds) Speech production and speech modeling, 403–39. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, J. L. (1983). Phonological acquisition and change. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
MacNeilage, P. F. & Davis, B. L. (1990). Acquisition of speech production: the achievement of segmental independence. In Hardcastle, W. J. & Marchal, A. (eds) Speech production and speech modeling, 55–67. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacNeilage, P. F., Davis, B. L., Kinney, A. & Matyear, C. L. (2000). The motor core of speech: a comparison of serial organization patterns in infants and languages. Child Development 71(1), 153–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McReynolds, L. & Kearns, M. (1983). Single subject experimental design in communication disorders. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
Newport, E., Gleitman, H. & Gleitman, L. R. (1977). Mother, I'd rather do it myself: some effects and non-effects of maternal speech style. In Snow, C. & Ferguson, C. A. (eds) Talking to children: language input and acquisition, 109–50. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Oller, D. K. & Delgado, R. E. (1990). Logical international phonetic program (Version 1.4). Miami, FL: Intelligent Hearing Systems.Google Scholar
Park, S. (2000). Frequency of Korean consonants in adults' daily conversation. Unpublished masters thesis, Ewha Womans University.Google Scholar
Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N. & Newport, E. L. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science 274, 1926–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snow, C. (1972). Mothers' speech to children learning language. Child Development 43, 549–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sohn, H.-M. (1999). The Korean language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Teixeira, E. R. & Davis, B. L. (2002). Early sound patterns in the speech of two Brazilian Portuguese speakers. Language and Speech 45(2), 179–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vihman, M. M. (1993). The construction of a phonological system. In de Boysson-Bardies, B., de Schonen, S., Jusczyk, P., MacNeilage, P. & Morton, J. (eds) Developmental neurocognition: speech and face processing in the first year of life, 411–20. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vihman, M. M. (1996). Phonological development: the origins of language in the child. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Vihman, M. M. & Velleman, S. L. (2000). Phonetics and the origins of phonology. In Burton-Roberts, N., Carr, P. & Docherty, G. (eds) Phonological knowledge: its nature and status, 305–39. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vihman, M. M., Kay, E., Boysson-Bardies, B., Durand, C. & Sundberg, U. (1994). External sources of individual differences? A cross-linguistic analysis of the phonetics of mothers' speech to one-year-old children. Developmental Psychology 30(5), 651–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, M. (1964). The new Merriam-Webster pocket dictionary. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Weijer, J. van de (2002). How much does an infant hear in a day? Proceedings of the GALA2001 Conference on Language Acquisition, 279–82. Lisbon: Associação Portuguesa de Linguistíca.Google Scholar
Weissenborn, J. & Höhle, B. (eds) (2001). Approaches to bootstrapping: phonological, lexical, syntactic and neurophysiological aspects of early language acquisition. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Yoo, J. (1985). Korean reverse dictionary. Seoul, Korea: Jung-Eum-Sa.Google Scholar
Zamuner, T. S. (2003). Input-based phonological acquisition. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar