Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:57:45.240Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The second-language vocabulary trajectories of Turkish immigrant children in Norway from ages five to ten: the role of preschool talk exposure, maternal education, and co-ethnic concentration in the neighborhood*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2013

VESLEMØY RYDLAND
Affiliation:
University of Oslo, Norway
VIBEKE GRØVER
Affiliation:
University of Oslo, Norway
JOSHUA LAWRENCE
Affiliation:
University of California, Irvine, USA

Abstract

Little research has explored how preschools can support children's second-language (L2) vocabulary development. This study keenly followed the progress of twemty-six Turkish immigrant children growing up in Norway from preschool (age five) to fifth grade (age ten). Four different measures of preschool talk exposure (amount and diversity of teacher-led group talk and amount and diversity of peer talk), as well as the demographic variables of maternal education and co-ethnic concentration in the neighborhood, were employed to predict the children's L2 vocabulary trajectories. The results of growth analyses revealed that maternal education was the only variable predicting children's vocabulary growth during the elementary years. However, teacher-led talk, peer talk, and neighborhood predicted children's L2 vocabulary skills at age five, and these differences were maintained up to age ten. This study underscores the importance of both preschool talk exposure (teacher-led talk and peer talk) and demographic factors on L2 learners' vocabulary development.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[*]

Address for correspondence: Veslemøy Rydland, Department of Education, University of Oslo, PO Box 1092, Blindern, 0317 Oslo. tel: + 47 92 08 34 92; e-mail: [email protected]

References

REFERENCES

Aukrust, V. Grøver (2007). Young children acquiring second language vocabulary in preschool group-time: does amount, diversity, and discourse complexity of teacher talk matter? Journal of Research in Childhood Education 22, 1737.Google Scholar
Blom, S. & Henriksen, K. (eds.) (2009). Living conditions among immigrants in Norway 2005/2006. Statistics Norway, Report 2009/2. Available on-line at: http://www.ssb.no/english/subjects/02/01/10/rapp_200902_en/Google Scholar
Bloom, H. S. (1995). Minimum detectable effects a simple way to report the statistical power of experimental designs. Evaluation Review 19, 547–56.Google Scholar
Bowers, E. P. & Vasilyeva, M. (2011). The relation between teacher input and lexical growth of preschoolers. Applied Psycholinguistics 32, 221–41.Google Scholar
Cekaite, A., Blum-Kulka, S., Grøver, V. & Teubal, E. (eds.) (forthcoming 2013). Children's peer discourse: peer interactions and pragmatic development in first and second language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Colwell, M., Pettit, G., Meece, D., Bates, J. E. & Dodge, K. A. (2001). Cumulative risk and continuity in non-parental care from infancy to early adolescence. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 47, 207234.Google Scholar
Connor, C. M., Morrison, F. J. & Slominski, L. (2006). Preschool instruction and children's emergent literacy growth. Journal of Educational Psychology 98, 665–89.Google Scholar
Dickinson, D. K. (2001). Large-group and free-play times. Conversational settings supporting language and literacy development. In Dickinson, D. & Tabors, P. (eds.), Beginning literacy with language, 223–56. Baltimore, MD: Paul Brookes.Google Scholar
Dickinson, D. K. & Porche, M. V. (2011). Relation between language experiences in preschool classrooms and children's kindergarten and fourth-grade language and reading abilities. Child Development 82, 870–86.Google Scholar
Dunn, L. M. & Dunn, L. M. (1997). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, 3rd ed. (PPVT-III). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
Einarsdottir, J. & Wagner, J. T. (eds.) (2006). Nordic childhoods and early education: philosophy, research, policy, and practice in Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Farkas, G. & Beron, K. (2004). The detailed age trajectory of oral vocabulary knowledge: differences by class and race. Social Science Research 33, 464–97.Google Scholar
Golberg, H., Paradis, J. & Crago, M. (2008). Lexical acquisition over time in minority first language children learning English as a second language. Applied Psycholinguistics 29, 4165.Google Scholar
Han, M., Roskos, K., Christie, J., Mandzuk, S. & Vukelich, C. (2005). Learning words: large group time as a vocabulary development opportunity. Journal of Research in Childhood Education 19, 333–45.Google Scholar
Hart, B. & Risley, T. R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Baltimore, MD: Paul Brookes.Google Scholar
Henning, C., McIntosh, B., Arnott, W. & Dodd, B. (2010). Long-term outcome of oral language and phonological awareness intervention with socially disadvantaged preschoolers: the impact on language and literacy. Journal of Research in Reading 33, 231–46.Google Scholar
Henry, G. & Rickman, D. (2007). Do peers influence children's skill development in preschool? Economics of Educational Review 26, 100112.Google Scholar
Hoff, E. (2006). How social contexts support and shape language development. Developmental Review 26, 5588.Google Scholar
Hurtado, N., Marchman, V. A. & Fernald, A. (2008). Does input influence uptake? Links between maternal talk, processing speed and vocabulary size in Spanish-learning children. Developmental Science 11, 3139.Google Scholar
Huttenlocher, J., Vasilyeva, M., Cymerman, E. & Levine, S. (2002). Language input and child syntax. Cognitive Psychology 45, 337–74.Google Scholar
Jia, G. & Aaronson, D. (2003). A longitudinal study of Chinese children and adolescents learning English in the United States. Applied Psycholinguistics 24, 131–61.Google Scholar
Lawrence, J., Capotosto, L., Branum-Martin, L., White, C. & Snow, C. (2012). Language proficiency, home-language status, and English vocabulary development: a longitudinal follow-up of the Word Generation program. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 15, 437–51.Google Scholar
Lervåg, A. & Aukrust, V. Grøver (2010). Vocabulary knowledge is a critical determinant of the difference in reading comprehension growth between first and second language learners. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 51, 612–20.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (1995). The CHILDES Project: tools for analyzing talk. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Mancilla-Martinez, J. & Lesaux, N. K. (2011a). Early home language use and later vocabulary development. Journal of Educational Psychology 103, 535–46.Google Scholar
Mancilla-Martinez, J. & Lesaux, N. K. (2011b). The gap between Spanish speakers' word reading and word knowledge: a longitudinal study. Child Development 82, 1544–60.Google Scholar
Martínez-Sussmann, C., Akhtar, N., Diesendruck, G. & Markson, L. (2011). Orienting to third-party conversations. Journal of Child Language 38, 273–96.Google Scholar
Mashburn, A. J., Justice, L. M., Downer, J. T. & Pianta, R. C. (2009). Peer effects on children's language achievement during pre-kindergarten. Child Development 80, 686702.Google Scholar
Pan, B. A., Rowe, M. L., Singer, J. D. & Snow, C. E. (2005). Maternal correlates of growth in toddler vocabulary production in low-income families. Child Development 76, 763–82.Google Scholar
Pellegrini, A. D., Galda, L., Bartini, M. & Charak, D. (1998). Oral language and literacy learning in context: the role of social relationships. Merrill Palmer Quarterly 44, 3854.Google Scholar
Rydland, V., Aukrust, V. Grøver & Fulland, H. (2012). How word decoding, vocabulary and prior topic knowledge predict reading comprehension. A study of language-minority students in Norwegian fifth grade classrooms. Reading & Writing; An Interdisciplinary Journal 25, 465–82.Google Scholar
Rydland, V., Aukrust, V. Grøver & Fulland, H. (in press). Living in neighborhoods with high or low co-ethnic concentration: Turkish–Norwegian-speaking students' vocabulary skills and reading comprehension. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism.Google Scholar
Schechter, C. & Bye, B. (2007). Preliminary evidence for the impact of mixed-income preschools on low-income children's language growth. Early Childhood Research Quarterly 22, 137–46.Google Scholar
Scheele, A. F., Leseman, P. M. & Mayo, A. Y. (2010). The home language environment of monolingual and bilingual children and their language proficiency. Applied Psycholinguistics 31, 117–40.Google Scholar
Singer, J. & Willett, J. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: modeling change and even occurrence. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Snow, C., Lawrence, J. & White, C. (2009). Generating knowledge of academic language among urban middle school students. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness 2, 325–44.Google Scholar
Snow, C. E., Porche, M. V., Tabors, P. O. & Harris, S. R (2007). Is literacy enough? Pathways to academic success for adolescents. Baltimore, MD: Paul Brookes.Google Scholar
Vandell, D. L., Belsky, J., Burchinal, M., Steinberg, L. & Vandergrift, N. (2010). Do effects of early child care extend to age 15 years? Results from the NICHD study of early child care and youth development. Child Development 81, 737–56.Google Scholar
Weizman, Z. O. & Snow, C. E. (2001). Lexical output as related to children's vocabulary acquisition: effects of sophisticated exposure and support for meaning. Developmental Psychology 37, 265–79.Google Scholar
Zucker, T. A. , T. A., Justice, L. M., Piasta, S. B. & Kaderavek, J. N. (2010). Preschool teachers' literal and inferential questions and children's responses during whole-class shared reading. Early Childhood Research Quarterly 25, 6583.Google Scholar