Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:25:59.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Second-first language acquisition: analysis of expressive language skills in a sample of girls adopted from China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 July 2011

TONY XING TAN ,
TROY LOKER ,
ROBERT F. DEDRICK  and
KOFI MARFO
TONY XING TAN*
Affiliation:
University of South Florida
TROY LOKER
Affiliation:
University of South Florida
ROBERT F. DEDRICK
Affiliation:
University of South Florida
KOFI MARFO
Affiliation:
University of South Florida
*
[*]Address for correspondence: Tony Xing Tan, University of South Florida – Psychological and Social Foundations, EDU162 4202 E. Fowler Ave, Tampa Florida 33620, United States. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this study we investigated adopted Chinese girls' expressive English language outcomes in relation to their age at adoption, chronological age, length of exposure to English and developmental risk status at the time of adoption. Vocabulary and phrase utterance data on 318 girls were collected from the adoptive mothers using the Language Development Survey (LDS) (Achenbach & Rescorla, 2000). The girls, aged 18–35 months (M=26·2 months, SD=4·9 months), were adopted at ages ranging from 6·8 to 24 months (M=12·6 months, SD=3·1 months), and had been exposed to English for periods ranging from 1·6 to 27·6 months (M=13·7, SD=5·7). Findings suggest that vocabulary and mean length of phrase scores were negatively correlated with age at adoption but positively correlated with chronological age and length of exposure to English. Developmental risk status at the time of adoption was not correlated with language outcomes. The gap between their expressive language and that of same-age girls from the US normative sample was wider for children aged 18–23 months but was closed for children aged 30–35 months. About 16% of the children met the LDS criteria for delays in vocabulary and 17% met the LDS criteria for delays in mean length of phrase. Speech/language interventions were received by 33·3% of the children with delays in vocabulary and 25% with delays in phrase.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 39 , Issue 2 , March 2012 , pp. 365 - 382
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Achenbach, T. M. & Rescorla, L. A. (2000). Manual for the ASEBA Preschool Forms Profiles. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families.Google Scholar
Cohen, N. J., Lojkasek, M., Zadeh, Z. Y., Pugliese, M. & Kiefer, H. (2008). Children adopted from China: A prospective study of their growth and development. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 49(4), 458–68.Google Scholar
Croft, C., Beckett, C., Rutter, M., Castle, J., Colvert, E., Groothues, C., et al. (2007). Early adolescent outcomes of institutionally-deprived and non-deprived adoptees. II: Language as a protective factor and a vulnerable outcome. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 48(1), 31–44.Google Scholar
Dalen, M. (2001). School performances among internationally adopted children in Norway. Adoption Quarterly 5(2), 39–58.Google Scholar
Gauthier, K. & Genesee, F. (2011). Language development in internationally adopted children: A special case of early second language learning. Child Development 82(3), 887–901.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glennen, S. (2002). Language development and delay in internationally adopted infants and toddlers: A review. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 11, 333–39.Google Scholar
Glennen, S. (2005). New arrivals: Speech and language assessment for internationally adopted infants and toddlers within the first months home. Seminars in Speech and Language 26(1), 10–21.Google Scholar
Glennen, S. (2007). Predicting language outcomes for internationally adopted children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 50, 529–48.Google Scholar
Glennen, S. (2008). Speech and language ‘mythbusters’ for internationally adopted children. The ASHA Leader 13(17), 10–13.Google Scholar
Glennen, S. & Masters, M. G. (2002). Typical and atypical language development in infants and toddlers adopted from Eastern Europe. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 11, 417–33.Google Scholar
Hwa-Froelich, D. A. (2009). Communication development in infants and toddlers adopted from abroad. Topics in Language Disorders 29(1), 32–49.Google Scholar
Krakow, R. & Roberts, J. A. (2003). Acquisition of English vocabulary by young Chinese adoptees. Journal of Multilingual Communication Disorders 1(3), 169–76.Google Scholar
Krakow, R., Tao, S. & Roberts, J. A. (2005). Adoption age effects on English language acquisition: Infants and toddlers from China. Seminars in Speech and Language 26(1), 33–43.Google Scholar
Ladage, J. S. (2009). Medical issues in international adoption and their influence on language development. Topics in Language Disorders 29(1), 6–17.Google Scholar
Meacham, A. (2006). Language learning and the internationally adopted child. Early Childhood Education Journal 34(1), 73–79.Google Scholar
Miller, L. C. & Hendrie, N. W. (2000). Health of children adopted from China. Pediatrics 105(6), 76–91.Google Scholar
Patterson, J. L. (2000). Observed and reported expressive vocabulary and word combination in bilingual toddlers. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 43(1), 121–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pedhazur, E. J. (1997). Multiple regression in behavioral research, 3rd edn.Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.Google Scholar
Pollock, K. E. (2005). Early language growth in children adopted from China: Preliminary normative data. Seminars in Speech and Language 26(1), 22–32.Google Scholar
Pollock, K. E. & Price, J. (2005). Phonological skills of children adopted from China: Implications for assessment. Seminars in Speech and Language 26(1), 54–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rescorla, L. A. (1989). The Language Development Survey: A screening tool for delayed language in toddlers. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 54, 587–99.Google Scholar
Rescorla, L. A. & Achenbach, T. M. (2002). Use of the Language Development Survey (LDS) in a national probability sample of children 18 to 35 months old. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 45, 733–43.Google Scholar
Rescorla, L. A., Ratner, N. B., Jusczyk, P. & Jusczyk, A. M. (2005). Concurrent validity of the Language Development Survey: Associations with the MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 14(2), 156–63.Google Scholar
Roberts, J. A., Pollock, K. & Krakow, R. A. (2005). Continued catch-up and language delay in children adopted from China. Seminars in Speech and Language 26(1), 76–85.Google Scholar
Roberts, J. A., Pollock, K. E., Krakow, R., Price, J., Fulmer, K. C. & Wang, P. (2005). Language development in preschool-age children adopted from China. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 48(1), 93–107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberts, J. A. & Scott, K. A. (2009). Interpreting assessment data of internationally adopted Children: Clinical application of research evidence. Topics in Language Disorders 29(1), 82–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schafer, D. & Moersch, M. (1981). The early intervention development profile: Developmental programming for infants and young children. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Snedeker, J., Geren, J. & Shafto, C. (2007). Starting over: International adoption as a natural experiment in language development. Psychological Science 18(1), 79–87.Google Scholar
Tan, T. X. & Marfo, K. (2006). Parental ratings of behavioral adjustment in two samples of adopted Chinese girls: Age-related versus socio-emotional correlates and predictors. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 27(1), 14–30.Google Scholar
Tan, T. X., Marfo, K. & Dedrick, R. F. (2010). Early developmental and psychosocial risks and longitudinal behavioral adjustment outcomes for preschool-age girls adopted from China. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 31(4), 306–314.Google Scholar
Tan, T. X. & Yang, Y. (2005). Language development of Chinese adoptees 18–35 months old. Early Childhood Research Quarterly 20(1), 57–68.Google Scholar
United States Department of Homeland Security (2010). Yearbook of Immigration Statistics in 2009 (p. 35). Washington DC: Author. Retrieved from <www.dhs.gov/files/statistics/publications/yearbook.shtm>..>Google Scholar