Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:02:16.694Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Schaerlaekens A. M., The two-word sentence in child language development. The Hague: Mouton, 1973. Pp. 198.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Arthur W. Staats
Arthur W. Staats
Affiliation:
Department of PsychologyUniversity of Hawaii
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , November 1975 , pp. 322 - 326
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Fodor, J. A. (1965). Could meaning be an rm? JVLVB 4. 73–81.Google Scholar
Osgood, C. E. (1953). Method and theory in experimental psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (ed.) (1971). The ontogenesis of grammar. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staats, A. W. (1968). Learning, language, and cognition. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Staats, A. W. (1971 a). Linguistic-mentalistic theory versus an explanatory S-R learning theory of language development. In Slobin, D. I. (ed.), The ontogenesis of grammar. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Staats, A. W. (1971 b). Child learning, intelligence, and personality. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Staats, A. W. (1974). Behaviorism and cognitive theory in the study of language: neopsycholinguistics. In Schiefelbusch, R. L. & Lloyd, L. L. (eds), Language perspectives: acquisition, retardation, and intervention. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar