Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Goldberg, Adele E.
2006.
Categories in Use.
Vol. 47,
Issue. ,
p.
33.
Kidd, Evan
Lieven, Elena
and
Tomasello, Michael
2006.
Examining the role of lexical frequency in the acquisition and processing of sentential complements.
Cognitive Development,
Vol. 21,
Issue. 2,
p.
93.
Bybee, Joan
2007.
Adele Goldberg, Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. Pp. 280. ISBN 0-19-9-268517 and 0-19-9-268525 (pbk)..
Journal of Child Language,
Vol. 34,
Issue. 3,
p.
692.
Goldberg, Adele E.
Casenhiser, Devin
and
White, Tiffani R.
2007.
Constructions as categories of language.
New Ideas in Psychology,
Vol. 25,
Issue. 2,
p.
70.
Kruschke, John K.
2009.
The Psychology of Learning and Motivation.
Vol. 51,
Issue. ,
p.
153.
Gonzálvez-García, Francisco
2009.
The family of object-related depictives in English and Spanish: towards a usage-based constructionist analysis.
Language Sciences,
Vol. 31,
Issue. 5,
p.
663.
Sethuraman, Nitya
and
Smith, Linda B.
2010.
Cross-linguistic differences in talking about scenes.
Journal of Pragmatics,
Vol. 42,
Issue. 11,
p.
2978.
Chan, Angel
2010.
The Cantonese double object construction with bei2 ‘give’ in bilingual children: The role of input.
International Journal of Bilingualism,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
65.
Syrett, Kristen
and
Lidz, Jeffrey
2010.
30-Month-Olds Use the Distribution and Meaning of Adverbs to Interpret Novel Adjectives.
Language Learning and Development,
Vol. 6,
Issue. 4,
p.
258.
MÜLLER, STEFAN
2010.
Persian complex predicates and the limits of inheritance-based analyses.
Journal of Linguistics,
Vol. 46,
Issue. 3,
p.
601.
Kidd, Evan
Lieven, Elena V.M.
and
Tomasello, Michael
2010.
Lexical frequency and exemplar-based learning effects in language acquisition: evidence from sentential complements.
Language Sciences,
Vol. 32,
Issue. 1,
p.
132.
Lieven, Elena
and
Behrens, Heike
2011.
Research Methods in Child Language.
p.
226.
Hampe, Beate
2011.
Discovering constructions by means of collostruction analysis: The English Denominative Construction.
cogl,
Vol. 22,
Issue. 2,
p.
211.
de Marneffe, Marie-Catherine
Grimm, Scott
Arnon, Inbal
Kirby, Susannah
and
Bresnan, Joan
2012.
A statistical model of the grammatical choices in child production of dative sentences.
Language and Cognitive Processes,
Vol. 27,
Issue. 1,
p.
25.
GOLDBERG, ADELE E.
2013.
Argument Structure Constructions versus Lexical Rules or Derivational Verb Templates.
Mind & Language,
Vol. 28,
Issue. 4,
p.
435.
Johnson, Matt A.
Turk-Browne, Nicholas B.
and
Goldberg, Adele E.
2013.
Prediction plays a key role in language development as well as processing.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 36,
Issue. 4,
p.
360.
CRUTCHLEY, ALISON
2013.
Structure of child and adult past counterfactuals, and implications for acquisition of the construction.
Journal of Child Language,
Vol. 40,
Issue. 2,
p.
438.
SETHURAMAN, NITYA
and
SMITH, LINDA B.
2013.
Verbs and attention to relational roles in English and Tamil.
Journal of Child Language,
Vol. 40,
Issue. 2,
p.
358.
McDONOUGH, KIM
and
NEKRASOVA-BECKER, TATIANA
2014.
Comparing the effect of skewed and balanced input on English as a foreign language learners’ comprehension of the double-object dative construction.
Applied Psycholinguistics,
Vol. 35,
Issue. 2,
p.
419.
Franceschi, Daniele
2014.
Licensing and blocking factors in the use of BEGIN verbs.
Review of Cognitive Linguistics,
Vol. 12,
Issue. 2,
p.
304.