Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T15:25:42.525Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The role of elicited verbal imitation in toddlers’ word learning*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 June 2015

ROSEMARY HODGES
Affiliation:
The University of Sydney, Australia
NATALIE MUNRO*
Affiliation:
The University of Sydney, Australia
ELISE BAKER
Affiliation:
The University of Sydney, Australia
KARLA McGREGOR
Affiliation:
The University of Iowa, and The University of Sydney
KIMBERLEY DOCKING
Affiliation:
The University of Sydney, Australia
JOANNE ARCIULI
Affiliation:
The University of Sydney, Australia
*
Address for correspondence: Natalie Munro, Discipline of Speech Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Australia. P.O. Box 170, Lidcombe, 1825, NSWAustralia. tel: +61 2 9351 9880; fax: +61 2 9351 9173; e-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

This study is about the role of elicited verbal imitation in toddler word learning. Forty-eight toddlers were taught eight nonwords linked to referents. During training, they were asked to imitate the nonwords. Naming of the referents was tested at three intervals (one minute later [uncued], five minutes, and 1–7 days later [cued]) and recognition at the last two intervals. Receptive vocabulary, nonword repetition, and expressive phonology were assessed. The accuracy of elicited imitation during training predicted naming at one and five minutes, but not 1–7 days later. Neither nonword repetition nor expressive phonology was associated with naming over time but extant vocabulary predicted performance at all time intervals. We hypothesize that elicited imitation facilitates word learning in its earliest stages by supporting encoding of the word form into memory and allowing practice of the articulatory-phonological plan. At later stages, vocabulary facilitates integration of the word form into the lexical network.

Type
Brief Research Reports
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The authors are grateful to the families and children who participated in this study. This work was supported by the University of Sydney International Program Development Fund. The first author acknowledges the support of the Helga Pettitt Postgraduate Faculty of Health Sciences Study Award, and the second author the University of Sydney Equity Fellowship. Declaration of Interest Statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest (commercial or financial) in the conduct of this research.

References

REFERENCES

Abbs, B., Gupta, P. & Khetarpal, N. (2008). Is overt repetition critical to expressive word learning? The role of overt repetition in word learning with and without semantics. Applied Psycholinguistics 29, 627–67.Google Scholar
Chiat, S. & Roy, P. (2007). The preschool repetition test: an evaluation of performance in typically developing and clinically referred children. Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research 50, 429–43.Google Scholar
Dunn, L. M. & Dunn, D. M. (2007). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, 4th ed. Bloomington, MN: NCS Pearson, Inc. Google Scholar
Fenson, L., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S., Thal, D., Bates, E., Hartung, J. P., … Reilly, J. S. (1993). MacArthur Communicative Development Inventories: user's guide and technical manual. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group, Inc.Google Scholar
Goldman, R. & Fristoe, M. (2000). Goldman Fristoe Test of Articulation: 2. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
Heisler, L., Goffman, L. & Younger, B. (2010). Lexical and articulatory interactions in children's language production. Developmental Science 13, 722–30.Google Scholar
Hoff, E., Core, C. & Bridges, K. (2008). Non-word repetition assesses phonological memory and is related to vocabulary development in 20- to 24-month-olds. Journal of Child Language 35, 903–16.Google Scholar
Keren-Portnoy, T., Vihman, M. M., DePaolis, R. A., Whitaker, C. J. & Williams, N., M. (2010). The role of vocal practice in constructing phonological working memory. Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research 53, 1280–93.Google Scholar
Klee, T. & Harrison, C. (2001). CDI Words and Sentences validity and preliminary norms for British English. Paper presented at Child Language Seminar, University of Hertfordshire, England.Google Scholar
Leonard, L. B., Chapman, K., Rowan, L. E. & Weiss, A. L. (1983). Three hypotheses concerning young children's imitations of lexical items. Developmental Psychology 19, 591601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masur, E. F. (1995) Infants’ early verbal imitation and their later lexical development. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 41, 286306.Google Scholar
Masur, E. F. & Eichorst, D. L. (2002). Infants’ spontaneous imitation of novel versus familiar words: relations to observational and maternal report measures of their lexicons. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 48, 405–26.Google Scholar
McGregor, K. K. (2014). What a difference a day makes. Change in memory for newly learned word forms over 24 hours. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 57, 1842–50.Google Scholar
Munro, N., Baker, E., McGregor, K. K., Docking, K., & Arciuli, J. (2012). Why word learning is not fast. Frontiers in Developmental Psychology 41, 110.Google Scholar
Reilly, S., Bavin, E. L., Bretherton, L., Conway, L., Eadie, P., Cini, E., … Wake, M. (2009). The Early Language in Victoria Study (ELVS): a prospective, longitudinal study of communication skills and expressive vocabulary development at 8, 12 and 24 months. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 11, 344–57.Google Scholar
Roy, P. & Chiat, S. (2004). A prosodically controlled word and nonword repetition task for 2- to 4-year-olds: evidence from typically developing children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 47, 223–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seeff-Gabriel, B., Chiat, S. & Roy, P. (2008). The Early Repetition Battery. London: Pearson Assessment.Google Scholar
Smith, B. L., McGregor, K. K. & DeMille, D. (2006). Phonological development in lexically precocious 2-year-olds. Applied Psycholinguistics 27, 355–75.Google Scholar
Stokes, S. F. & Klee, T. (2009a). Factors that influence vocabulary development in two-year- old children. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry 50, 498505.Google Scholar
Stokes, S. F. & Klee, T. (2009b). The diagnostic accuracy of a new test of early nonword repetition for differentiating late talking and typically developing children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 52, 872–82.Google Scholar
Storkel, H. L. (2001). Learning new words: phonotactic probability in language development. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 44, 1321–37.Google Scholar
Storkel, H. L. & Adlof, S. M. (2009). The effect of semantic set size on word learning by preschool children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 52, 306–20.Google Scholar