Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:05:17.805Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Relations between prosodic variables and communicative functions*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

Judy Flax*
Affiliation:
Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Margaret Lahey
Affiliation:
Emerson College
Katherine Harris
Affiliation:
City University of New York
Arthur Boothroyd
Affiliation:
City University of New York
*
11 Washington Ave, Short Hills, NJ07078, USA.

Abstract

Three children were observed interacting with their mothers at three different times: before the onset of single words, when vocabulary consisted of 10 words, and when vocabulary consisted of 50 words. Relations between communicative functions and acoustic analyses of prosodie variables (i.e. rise vs. nonrise of terminal contours) were studied. Considerable variability was found among the children in the number of rises produced overall and those produced for any function. Each child's use of rise was fairly constant over time and rises were produced RELATIVELY more frequently than nonrises with functions requiring a response from the listener. Factors affecting similarities and differences are discussed.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The study reported here is based on a doctoral dissertation completed by the first author at the Graduate School of the City University of New York. We appreciate comments on a version of the manuscript by Lois Bloom.

References

REFERENCES

Bloom, L. (1970). Language development: form and function in emerging grammars. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Bloom, L., Lightbown, P. & Hood, L. (1975). Structure and variation in child language. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 40.Google Scholar
Delack, J. B. (1976). Aspects of infant speech development in the first year of life. Canadian Journal of Linguistics / Le Revue Canadienne de Linguistique 21. 1737.Google Scholar
D'Odorico, L. (1984). Non-segmental features in prelinguistic communications: an analysis of some types of infant cry and noncry vocalizations. Journal of Child Language 11. 1727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dore, J. (1973). The development of speech acts. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, City University of New York.Google Scholar
Dore, J. (1974). A pragmatic description of early language development. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 3. 343–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engel, W. V. R. (1973). The development from sound to phoneme in child language. In Ferguson, C. & Slobin, D. (eds), Child language development. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Frankenburg, W. K. & Dodds, J. B. (1964). Denver Developmental Screening Test. Denver: University of Colorado Medical Center.Google Scholar
Furrow, D. (1984). Young children's use of prosody. Journal of Child Language 11. 203–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galligan, R. (1987). Intonation with single words: purposive and grammatical use. Journal of Child Language 14. 121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gerber, S. (1987). Form and function in early language development. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, City University of New York.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1975). Learning hoto to mean. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Kaplan, E. (1969). The role of intonation in the acquisition of language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Kent, R. & Bauer, H. (1985). Vocalizations of one-year-olds. Journal of Child Language 12. 491526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lahey, M., Flax, J., Harris, K. & Boothroyd, A. (In press). Vocal fundamental frequency variability in young children: comments on Robb & Saxman (1985). Journal of Speech and Hearing Research.Google Scholar
Lewis, M. M. (1951). Infant speech: a study of the beginnings of language. New York: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Marcos, H. (1987). Communicative function of pitch range and pitch direction in infants. Journal of Child Language 14. 255–68.Google Scholar
Menn, L. (1976). Control and contrast in beginning speech: a case study in the development of word form and word function. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, University Microfilm 76–24, 139.Google Scholar
Menyuk, P. & Bernholtz, N. (1969). Prosodic features and children's language production. MIT Quarterly Progress Report 93. 216–9.Google Scholar
Morse, P. A. (1972). The discrimination of speech and non-speech stimuli in early infancy. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 14. 477–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, A. M. (1983). The units of language acquisition. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Pike, E. G. (1944). Controlled infant intonation. Language Learning 2. 21–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, M. L. (1978). Contour in context. In Campbell, R. & Smith, P. (eds), Recent advances in the psychology of language. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Sachs, J. (1977). The adaptive significance of linguistic input to prelinguistic infants. In Snow, C. & Ferguson, C. (eds), Talking to children. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Stern, D., Spieker, S. & MacKain, K. (1982). Intonation contours as signals in maternal speech to prelinguistic infants. Developmental Psychology 18. 727–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, D., Spieker, S. & Barnett, R. K. (1983). The prosody of maternal speech: infant age and context related changes. Journal of Child Language 10. 115.Google Scholar
Tonkova-Yampol'skya, R. V. (1973). Development of speech intonation in infants during the first two years of life. In Ferguson, C. A. & Slobin, D. I. (eds), Studies of child language development. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Weir, R. (1962). Language in the crib. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar