Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T12:17:18.893Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reference states and reversals: undoing actions with verbs*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Eve V. Clark ,
Kathie L. Carpenter  and
Werner Deutsch
Eve V. Clark*
Affiliation:
Stanford University
Kathie L. Carpenter
Affiliation:
University of Oregon
Werner Deutsch
Affiliation:
University of Braunschweig
*
Stanford University, Department of Linguistics, Stanford, CA 94305-2150, USA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The purpose of these studies is to characterize children's conception of reversal and its relation to a reference state. A reversal is the move from one state to some prior state of affairs. For example, shoes that have been TIED can be UNTIED, parcels WRAPPED then UNWRAPPED, and dishes COVERED then UNCOVERED. The present studies were designed to find out how children (aged 1;0 to 5;0) describe reversals of action that restore objects to a prior, less constrained, state. In English, the prefix un- offers the most productive device for this, but, initially, children rely on a verb like open, on general purpose undo, and on particles like out and off, As they acquire un-, English-speaking children must learn that this prefix applies primarily to verbs for change-of-state, often for enclosing, covering and attaching. In German, there is no reversal prefix, but there are productive particles. German-speaking children also begin with a verb like open and then turn to verb particles on a course similar to that in English to express reversals.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 22 , Issue 3 , October 1995 , pp. 633 - 662
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[*]

This research was supported in part by the National Science Foundation (BNS-80 07349), The Spencer Foundation, and the Max-Planck-Institut für Psycholinguistik, Nijmegen, NL. We thank Barbara F. Hecht, Sherry Kowtko and Inga Tarim for help in collecting the data, and Olive Gong for help with the analyses. We are grateful to the teachers and children at Bing Nursery School, Stanford; Kindergarten Sonnenblume, Kleve; Kindergarten Burg Ranzow, Materborn; Kindergarten Gretenberg, Düsseldorf, and Kindergarten Overbergstrasse, Kellen, for their invaluable collaboration. And we are indebted to Herbert H. Clark and to two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on an earlier draft.

References

REFERENCES

Berman, R. A. (1978). Early verbs: comments on how and why a child uses his first words. International Journal of Psycholinguistics 5, 21–39.Google Scholar
Berman, R. A. (1987). Productivity in the lexicon: new-word formation in Modern Hebrew. Folia Linguistica XXI, 425–61.Google Scholar
Bloom, L. (1973). One word at a time. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Boons, J.-P. (1984). Sceller un piton dans le mur; désceller un piton du mur: pour une syntaxe de la préfixation négative. Langue Française 25, 94–128.Google Scholar
Bowerman, M. (1978). The acquisition of word meaning: an investigation into some current conflicts. In Waterson, N. & Snow, C. (eds), The development of communication. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Bowerman, M. (1981). The child's expression of meaning: expanding relationships among lexicon, syntax, and morphology. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 379, 172–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowerman, M. (1982). Reorganizational processes in lexical and syntactic development. In Wanner, E. & Gleitman, L. R. (eds), Language acquisition: the state of the art. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Bowerman, M. (1983). Hidden meanings: the role of covert conceptual structures in children's development of language. In Rogers, D. R. & Sloboda, J. A. (eds), The acquisition of symbolic skills. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Chmura-Klekotowa, M. (1970). Odbicie tendencji slowotwórczych jezyka polskiego neologizmach dzieci [‘Reflection of derivational trends of the Polish language in children's neologisms’]. Prace Filologiczne (Warsaw) 20, 153–9.Google Scholar
Choi, S. & Bowerman, M. (1991). Learning to express motion events in English and Korean: the influence of language-specific lexicalization patterns. Cognition 41, 83–121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, E. V. (1974). Normal states and evaluative viewpoints. Language 50, 316–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, E. V. (1981). Negative verbs in children's speech. In Klein, W. & Levelt, W. J. M. (eds), Crossing the boundaries in linguistics: studies presented to Manfred Bierwisch. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Clark, E. V. (1990). On the pragmatics of contrast. Journal of Child Language 17, 417–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, E. V. (1993). The lexicon in acquisition. Cambridge: C.U.P.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, E. V. & Berman, R. A. (1984). Structure and use in the acquisition of word formation. Language 60, 542–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, E. V. & Clark, H. H. (1979). When nouns surface as verbs. Language 55, 767–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, E. V. & Cohen, Sophia R. (1984). Productivity and memory for new word-forms. Journal of Child Language 11, 611–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cruse, D. A. (1986). Lexical semantics. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Curme, G. O. (1964). A grammar of the German language (2nd rev. ed.), Part III: Word-formation. New York: Ungar.Google Scholar
Dowty, D. (1979). Word meaning and Montague grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farwell, C. B. (1975). Aspects of early verb semantics – Pre-causative development. Papers & Reports on Child Language Development (Stanford University) 10, 48–58.Google Scholar
Griffiths, P. & Atkinson, M. (1978). A ‘door’ to verbs. In Waterson, N. & Snow, C. (eds), The development of communication. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Grimm, H. (1975). On the child's acquisition of semantic structure underlying the word-field of prepositions. Language & Speech 18, 97–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guillaume, P. (1927). Les débuts de la phrase dans le langage de l'enfant. Journal de Psychologie 24, 1–25.Google Scholar
Horn, L. R. (1988). Morphology, pragmatics, and the un- verb. In J. Powers & K. de Jong (eds), Proceedings of the fifth Eastern States Conference on Linguistics. Columbus, OH: Department of Linguistics, The Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Kagan, J. (1981). The second year: the emergence of self-awareness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuczaj, Stan A. II, (1979). Evidence for a language learning strategy. Child Development 50, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, P. (1993). Cryptotypes, meaning-form mappings, and overgeneralizations. In Clark, E. V. (ed.), Proceedings of the 24th annual Child Language Research Forum. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Marchand, H. (1969). The categories and types of present-day English viord-formation (2nd ed.). Munich: C. H. Beck'sche Verlag.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1973). Cognitive prerequisites for the acquisition of grammar. In Ferguson, C. A. & Slobin, D. I. (eds), Studies of child language development. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Stern, C. & Stern, W. (1928). Die Kindersprache: eine psychologische und sprachtheoretische Untersuchung (4th ed.). Leipzig: Barth.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (1992). First verbs: a case study of early grammatical development. Cambridge: C.U.P.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whorf, B. L. (1956). Language, thought, and reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wunderlich, D. (1983). On the compositionality of German prefix verbs. In Bäuerle, R., Schwarze, C. & von Stechow, A. (eds), Meaning, use, and interpretation of language. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Zimmer, K. E. (1964). Affixal negation in English and other languages. Supplement to Word 20 (2).Google Scholar