Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T21:36:53.548Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Putting singular and plural morphology in context*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2012

MARCO DISPALDRO  and
BEATRICE BENELLI
MARCO DISPALDRO
Affiliation:
Università di Padova, Padova, Italy
BEATRICE BENELLI
Affiliation:
Università di Padova, Padova, Italy
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study explores the development of children's knowledge of linguistic and pragmatic aspects of singular and plural in Italian, for definite articles (Experiment 1) and verbs (Experiment 2). Participants aged three to adult were asked to pick objects from two dishes, each with a different number of items on them (one vs. two), following the morphological information. Results show that children understand that singular forms refer to ‘one’ at about age four, whereas they understand that plural forms refer to ‘more than one’ when they are older than six. Moreover, children use singular and plural knowledge in appropriate relation with the referential context only when they are about six.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 39 , Issue 4 , September 2012 , pp. 863 - 884
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Antinucci, F. & Miller, R. (1976). How children talk about what happened. Journal of Child Language 3, 167–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benelli, B., Belacchi, C., Gini, G. & Lucangeli, D. (2006). To define means to say what you know about things: The development of definitional skills as metalinguistic acquisition. Journal of Child Language 33, 71–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caprin, C. & Guasti, M. T. (2009). The acquisition of morphosyntax in Italian: A cross-sectional study. Applied Psycholinguistics 30, 23–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caselli, M. C., Brutti, G., Campagnoli, M. G. & Leonard, L. B. (1994). Produzione e comprensione di alcuni aspetti grammaticali dell'italiano in bambini fra i 2 anni e mezzo e i 5 anni [Production and comprehension of some grammatical aspects of Italian in children aged between 2 ; 6 and 5 ; 0]. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia 5, 789–811.Google Scholar
Cipriani, P., Chilosi, A. M., Bottari, P. & Pfanner, L. (1993). L'acquisizione della morfosintassi in italiano [Morphosyntactic acquisition in Italian]. Padova: Unipress.Google Scholar
Conti, D. J. & Camras, L. A. (1984). Children's understanding of conversational principles. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 38(3), 456–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devescovi, A., D'Amico, S. & Gentile, P. (1999). The development of sentence comprehension in Italian: A reaction time study. First Language 19, 129–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dispaldro, M. (2009). L'acquisizione della grammatica come complesso sistema cognitivo-linguistico [Grammar acquisition as cognitive and linguistic systems]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Univesità degli Studi di Padova, Italy.Google Scholar
Dispaldro, M., Caselli, M. C. & Stella, G. (2009). Morfologia grammaticale in bambini di 2 anni e mezzo e 3 anni [Grammatical morphology in children of 2 ; 6 and 3 ; 0]. Psicologia Clinica dello Sviluppo 1, 161–81.Google Scholar
Eskritt, M., Whalen, J. & Lee, K. (2008). Preschoolers can recognize violations of the Gricean maxims. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 26(3), 435–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fenson, L., Dale, P. A., Reznick, J. S., Bates, E., Thal, D. & Pethick, S. J. (1994). Variability in early communicative development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 242 59(5).Google ScholarPubMed
Glucksberg, S., Krauss, R. M. & Weisberg, R. (1966). Referential communication in nursery school children: Method and some preliminary findings. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 3, 333–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grice, H. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Cole, P. and Morgan, J. (eds), Syntax and semantics, Vol. 3, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. J. (1992). Contextualization and understanding. In Duranti, A. & Goodwin, C. (eds), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon, 229–52. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, V. E., de Villiers, J. G. & Seymour, H. N. (2005). Agreement without understanding? The case of third person singular /s/. First Language 25, 317–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kouider, S., Halberda, J., Wood, J. & Carey, S. (2006). Acquisition of English number marking: The singular–plural distinction. Language Learning and Development 2, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonard, L. B., Caselli, M. C. & Devescovi, A. (2002). Italian children's use of verb and noun morphology during the preschool years. First Language 22, 287–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, P. & Shirai, Y. (2000). The acquisition of lexical and grammatical aspect. Berlin/New York: Mounton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, P. H. (2005). Concise dictionary of linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Meroni, L. (2005). Putting children in context. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland.Google Scholar
Mulford, R. (1985). Comprehension of Icelandic pronoun gender: Semantic versus formal factors. Journal of Child Language 12, 443–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Munn, A., Miller, K. & Schmitt, C. (2005). Maximality and plurality in children's interpretation of definite. Paper presented at the 30th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. (1996). Language in cognitive development: The emergence of mediated mind. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, K., Skwerer, D. P., Goldman, S., Henseler, S., Presler, N. & Walkenfeld, F. F. (2003). Entering a community of minds: An experimental approach to ‘Theory of Mind’. Human Development 46, 24–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orsolini, M., Fanari, R. & Di Giacinto, P. (1994). La comprensione dei pronomi clitici nei bambini [The comprehension of clitic pronouns in children]. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia 5, 733–59.Google Scholar
Pérez-Pereira, M. (1991). The acquisition of gender: What Spanish children tell us. Journal of Child Language 18, 571–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scalise, S. (1994). Morfologia [Morphology]. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Schnoor, B. C. & Newman, R. S. (2001). Infants' developing comprehension of plurals. Paper presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Soderstrom, M. (2002). The acquisition of inflection morphology in early perceptual knowledge of syntax. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
Soderstrom, M. (2008). Early perception–late comprehension of grammar? The case of verbal -s: a response to de Villiers & Johnson (2007). Journal of Child Language 35, 671–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (1992). First verbs: A case study in early grammatical development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language. A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Winer, B. J., Brown, D. R. & Michels, K. M. (1971). Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Zapf, J. A. & Smith, L. B. (2008). Meaning matters in children's plural production. Cognition 108, 466–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar