Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:13:56.973Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pitch characteristics of Japanese maternal speech to infants*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

Nobuo Masataka
Nobuo Masataka*
Affiliation:
The University of Tokyo
*
Department of Anthropology, Faculty of Science, The University of Tokyo, Hongo, Bunkyo, Tokyo 113, Japan.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The fundamental frequency F0 patterns of maternal speech addressed to infants aged 0;3–0;4 were measured quantitatively. Speech samples were recorded when six Japanese-speaking mothers addressed an adult and their own infants. Japanese mothers speaking to adults use a relatively restricted F0 range, concentrated around the mother's F0, which tends to be near the low end of the total range used. These acoustic characteristics are not altered substantially when these same women speak to their infants in initial utterances to attract the infants' attention. If such attempts are unsuccessful, however, they are likely to make more exaggerated utterances, in which F0 shifts upward and the frequency range is significantly increased. Moreover, only when acoustic characteristics of maternal speech to infants are exaggerated, can the type of F0 contour of the infant's subsequent response be predicted to a significant extent from the mother's preceding utterance.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , June 1992 , pp. 213 - 223
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I thank Shozo Kojima and Toshikazu Hasegawa for their help in conducting this research. I am grateful to Katharine Perera and two anonymous reviewers for making invaluable comments.

References

REFERENCES

Cooper, R. P. & Aslin, R. N. (1990). Preference for infant-directed speech in the first month after birth. Child Development 61, 1584–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cruttenden, A. (1981). Falls and rises: meanings and universals. Journal of Linguistics 17, 77–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernald, A. (1984). The perceptual and affective salience of mother's speech to infants. In Feagans, L., Garvey, C. & Golinkoff, R. (eds), The origins and growth of communication, Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar
Fernald, A. (1985). Four-month-old infants prefer to listen to motherese. Infant Behavior and Development 8, 181–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernald, A. (1989). Intonation and communicative intent in mother's speech to infants: is the melody the message? Child Development 60, 1497–510.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fernald, A. & Simon, T. (1984). Expanded intonation contours in mothers' speech to newborns. Developmental Psychology 20, 104–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernald, A., Taeschner, T., Dunn, J., Papousek, M., Boysson-Bardies, B. de & Fukui, I. (1989). A cross-linguistic study of prosodie modifications in mothers' and fathers' speech to preverbal infants. Journal of Child Language 16, 477–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamica, O. (1977). Some prosodie and paralinguistic features of speech to young children. In Snow, C. E. & Ferguson, C. A. (eds), Talking to children: language input and acquisition. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Grieser, D. L. & Kuhl, P. (1988). Maternal speech to infants in a tonal language: support for universal prosodie features in motherese. Developmental Psychology 24, 14–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1975). Learning how to mean: explorations in the development of language. London: Edward Arnold.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kent, R. & Hodge, M. (1989). Oral-verbal morphogenesis: continuity and process in early speech behavior. Paper presented at the Symposium on Research in Child Language Disorders, University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar
Kent, R. D. & Murray, A. D. (1982). Acoustic features of infant vocalic utterances at 3, 6 and 9 months. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 72, 353–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kessen, W., Levine, J. & Wendrich, K. A. (1979). The imitation of pitch in infants. Infant Behavior and Development 2, 93–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koopmans-van Beinum, F. & van der Stelt, J. (1986). Early stages in the development of speech movements. In Lindblom, B. & Zetterstrom, R. (eds), Precursors of early speech. New York: Stockton Press.Google Scholar
Locke, J. L. (1983). Phonological acquisition and change. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, P. R. & Kent, R. D. (1990). Phonetic variation in multisyllable babbling. Journal of Child Language 17, 247–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newport, E. L., Gleitman, H. & Gleitman, L. R. (1977). Mother, I'd rather do it myself: some effects and non-effects of maternal speech style. In Snow, C. E. & Ferguson, C. A. (eds), Talking to children: language input and acquisition. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Papousek, M., Papousek, H. & Bornstein, M. (1985). The naturalistic vocal environment of young infants: on the significance of homogeneity and variability in parental speech. In Field, T. M. & Fox, N. A. (eds), Social perception in infants, Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1951). Play, dreams and imitation in childhood. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Robb, M. P., Saxon, J. H. & Grand, A. A. (1989). Vocal fundamental frequency characteristics during the first two years of life. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 85, 1708–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shute, B. & Wheldall, K. (1989). Pitch alternations in British motherese: some preliminary acoustic data. Journal of Child Language 16, 503–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokal, R. R. & Rohlf, F. J. (1981). Biometry (2nd edition). New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
Stern, D. N., Spieker, S., Barnett, R. K. & MacKain, K. (1983). The prosody of maternal speech: infant age and context related changes. Journal of Child Language 10, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stern, D. N., Spieker, S. & MacKain, K. (1982). Intonation contours as signals in maternal speech to prelinguistic infants. Developmental Psychology 18, 727–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomkins, S. (1962). Affect, imagery, consciousness. Vol. 1. The positive affect. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Werker, J. F. & McLeod, P. J. (1989). Infant preference for both male and female infant-directed talk: a developmental study of attentional and affective responsiveness. Canadian Journal of Psychology 43, 230–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar