Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T22:31:01.782Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ostensive definition in vocabulary teaching*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Anat Ninio
Anat Ninio
Affiliation:
The Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Ostensive definitions of words are ambiguous as to their referent. In a study of 40 mother–infant dyads engaged in looking at picture-books, it was found that 95% of ostensive definitions referred to the whole object depicted, rather than to its parts, attributes or actions. On the rare occasions when mothers named parts of objects, they avoided misunderstanding of the level of reference either by naming the part immediately after naming the whole, or by including a reference to the whole in the definition of the part. What's that? questions are not used to request labelling of the part.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , October 1980 , pp. 565 - 573
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ninio, A. (in press). Picture-book reading in mother-infant dyads belonging to two subgroups in Israel. ChDev 51.Google Scholar
Ninio, A. & Bruner, J. (1978). The achievement and antecedents of labelling. JChLang 5. 1–15.Google Scholar
Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M. & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. CogPsych 8. 382–439.Google Scholar
van Quine, W. O. (1960). Word and object. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1958). The blue and brown books. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar