Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:12:43.905Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On children's homonyms*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

David Ingram
David Ingram
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and discussion
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , October 1985 , pp. 671 - 680
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Benedict, R. (1979). Early lexical development: comprehension and production. JChLang 6. 183–200.Google ScholarPubMed
Durand, M. (1949). De quelques éliminations d'homonymes chez un enfant. Journal de psychologic normale et pathologique 42. 53–62.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. & Farwell, C. (1975). Words and sounds in early language acquisition. Lg 51. 410–39.Google Scholar
Ingram, D. (1975). Surface contrast in children's speech. JChLang 2. 287–92.Google Scholar
Ingram, D. (1976 a). Phonological disability in children. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Ingram, D. (1976 b). Phonological analysis of a child. Glossa 10. 3–27.Google Scholar
Ingram, D. (1981). Procedures for the phonological analysis of children's language. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Ingram, D. (1983). Jakobson revisited: some evidence from the acquisition of Polish. Paper presented to Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America,Minneapolis, Minn.Google Scholar
Ingram, D. (forthcoming). A manual for clinical phonological analysis.Google Scholar
Ingram, D. & Mitchell, G. (forthcoming). A longitudinal comparison of French and English phonological development.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1968). Child language, aphasia and phonological univetsals. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leopold, W. (1949). Speech development of a bilingual child. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Locke, J. (1979). Homonymy and sound changes in the child's acquisition of phonology. In Lass, R. (ed.), Speech and language: advances in basic research and practice. Vol. 2. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Macken, M. (1976). Permitted complexity in phonological development: one child's acquisition of Spanish consonants. Lingua 44. 219–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macken, M. (1979). Developmental reorganization of phonology: a hierarchy of basic units of acquisition. Lingua 49. 11–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priestley, T. (1980). Homonymy in child phonology. JChLang 7. 413–27.Google Scholar
Pye, C.Ingram, D. & List, H. (1984). A comparison of initial consonant acquisition in English and Quiché. Paper presented to the Third International Congress for the Study of Child Language,Austin, Texas.Google Scholar
Schwartz, R. & Leonard, L. (1982). Do children pick and choose? An examination of phonological selection and avoidance in early lexical acquisition. JChLang 9. 319–36.Google ScholarPubMed
Vihman, M. (1981). Phonology and the development of the lexicon: evidence from children's errors. JChLang 8. 239–64.Google ScholarPubMed