No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Not speaking the same language: 17-month-olds shift their perception of novel labels following brief exposure to non-native language
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 December 2018
Abstract
We examined if and when English-learning 17-month-olds would accommodate Japanese forms as labels for novel objects. In Experiment 1, infants (n = 22) who were habituated to Japanese word–object pairs looked longer at switched test pairs than familiar test pairs, suggesting that they had mapped Japanese word forms to objects. In Experiments 2 (n = 44) and 3 (n = 22), infants were presented with a spoken passage prior to habituation to assess whether experience with a different language would shift their perception of Japanese word forms. Here, infants did not demonstrate learning of Japanese word–object pairs. These findings offer insight into the flexibility of the developing perceptual system. That is, when there is no evidence to the contrary, 17-month-olds will accommodate forms that vary from their typical input but will efficiently constrain their perception when cued to the fact that they are not listening to their native language.
- Type
- Brief Research Reports
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018
References
Best, C. T., Tyler, M. D., Gooding, T. N., Orlando, C. B., & Quann, C. A. (2009). Development of phonological constancy. Psychological Science, 20(5), 539–42.Google Scholar
Cohen, L. B., Atkinson, D. J., & Chaput, H. H. (2004). Habit X: a new program for obtaining and organizing data in infant perception and cognition studies (Version 1.0) [Computer software]. Austin: University of Texas.Google Scholar
Creel, S. C. (2012). Phonological similarity and mutual exclusivity: on-line recognition of atypical pronunciations in 3–5-year-olds. Developmental Science, 15(5), 697–713.Google Scholar
Curtin, S., Byers-Heinlein, K., & Werker, J. F. (2011). Bilingual beginnings as a lens for theory development: PRIMIR in focus. Journal of Phonetics, 39(4), 492–504.Google Scholar
Graf Estes, K., Edwards, J., & Saffran, J. R. (2011). Phonotactic constraints on infant word learning. Infancy, 16(2), 180–97.Google Scholar
Hillenbrand, J., Getty, L. A., Clark, M. J., & Wheeler, K. (1995). Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 3099–111.Google Scholar
Hollich, G. (2008). Supercoder: a program for coding preferential looking (Version 1.7.1). [Computer Software]. West Lafayette: Purdue University.Google Scholar
Iverson, P., & Kuhl, P. K. (1996). Influences of phonetic identification and category goodness on American listeners’ perception of /r/ and /l/. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 99, 1130–40.Google Scholar
Liberman, A. M. (1957). Some results of research on speech perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 29, 117–23.Google Scholar
Liberman, A. M., Cooper, F. S., Shankweiler, D. P., & Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1967). Perception of the speech code. Psychological Review, 74(6), 431–61.Google Scholar
Lisker, L., & Abramson, S. A. (1964) A cross-linguistic study of voicing in initial stops: acoustical measurements. Word, 20, 384–422.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, H., Curtin, S., & Graham, S. A. (2012). 12-month-olds’ phonotactic knowledge guides their word–object mappings. Child Development, 83, 1129–36.Google Scholar
May, L., & Werker, J. F. (2014). Can a click be a word? Infants’ learning of non-native words. Infancy, 19, 281–300.Google Scholar
Mulak, K. E., Best, C. T., Tyler, M. D., Kitamura, C., & Irwin, J. R. (2013). Development of phonological constancy: 19-month-olds, but not 15-month-olds, identify words in a non-native regional accent. Child Development, 84, 2064–78.Google Scholar
Schmale, R., Cristià, A., & Seidl, A. (2012). Toddlers recognize words in an unfamiliar accent after brief exposure. Developmental Science, 15(6), 732–8.Google Scholar
Schmale, R., Cristià, A., Seidl, A., & Johnson, E. K. (2010). Developmental changes in infants’ ability to cope with dialect variation in word recognition. Infancy, 15(6), 650–62.Google Scholar
Schmale, R., Hollich, G., & Seidl, A. (2011). Contending with foreign accent in early word learning. Journal of Child Language, 38, 1096–108.Google Scholar
Schmale, R., & Seidl, A. (2009) Accommodating variability in voice and foreign accent: flexibility of early word representations. Developmental Science, 12, 583–601.Google Scholar
van der Feest, S., & Johnson, E. K. (2016). Input-driven differences in toddler's perception of a disappearing phonological contrast. Language Acquisition, 23(2), 89–111.Google Scholar
van Heugten, M., & Johnson, E. K. (2014). Learning to contend with accents in infancy: benefits of brief speaker exposure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 340–50.Google Scholar
Vukatana, E., Curtin, S., & Graham, S. A. (2016). Infants’ acceptance of phonotactically illegal word forms as object labels. Journal of Child Language, 43, 1400–11.Google Scholar
Werker, J. F., Cohen, L. B., Lloyd, V., Casasola, M., & Stager, C. L. (1998). Acquisition of word–object associations by 14-month-old infants. Developmental Psychology, 34(6), 1289–309.Google Scholar
Werker, J. F., & Curtin, S. (2005). PRIMIR: a developmental framework of infant speech processing. Language Learning and Development, 1(2), 197–234.Google Scholar
White, K. S., & Aslin, R. N. (2011). Adaptation to novel accents by toddlers. Developmental Science, 14(2), 372–84.Google Scholar