Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T21:24:14.389Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Monolingual and bilingual preschoolers’ use of gestures to interpret ambiguous pronouns*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2014

W. QUIN YOW
W. QUIN YOW*
Affiliation:
Singapore University of Technology and Design
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Young children typically do not use order-of-mention to resolve ambiguous pronouns, but may do so if given additional cues, such as gestures. Additionally, this ability to utilize gestures may be enhanced in bilingual children, who may be more sensitive to such cues due to their unique language experience. We asked monolingual and bilingual four-year-olds and adults to determine referents of ambiguous pronouns given order-of-mention and co-referential localizing gestures. Results showed that bilingual children, like adults, but not monolingual children, used order-of-mention with gestures to resolve ambiguous pronouns. This highlights a wider implication of bilingualism for socio-cognitive development in children.

Type
Brief Research Report
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 42 , Issue 6 , November 2015 , pp. 1394 - 1407
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[*]

The author wishes to thank Ellen Markman, Suzanne Flynn, Hannah Jaycox, Whitney Goodrich Smith, the children and parents who participated in the study, and the teachers and staff of Bing Nursery School. Portions of this work were previously presented at the Boston University Conference on Language Development (November 2012).

References

REFERENCES

Arnold, J. E., Brown-Schmidt, S., & Trueswell, J. C. (2007). Children's use of gender and order-of-mention during pronoun comprehension. Language and Cognitive Processes 22, 527–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, J. E., Brown-Schmidt, S., Trueswell, J. C., & Fagnano, M. (2004). Children's use of gender and order of mention during pronoun comprehension. In Trueswell, J. C. & Tanenhaus, M. K. (eds), Approaches to studying world-situated language use: bridging the language-as-product and language-as-action traditions, (pp. 261–284). Boston: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Arnold, J. E., Eisenband, J. G., Brown-Schmidt, S., & Trueswell, J. C. (2000). The rapid use of gender information: evidence of the time course of pronoun resolution from eye tracking. Cognition 76, 13–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, J. E., & Griffin, Z. M. (2007). The effect of additional characters on choice of referring expression: everyone counts. Journal of Memory and Language 56, 521–536.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ballard, D. H., Hayhoe, M. M., Pook, P. K., & Rao, R. P. N. (1997). Deictic codes for the embodiment of cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20, 723–767.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buck, G. M., Msall, M. E., Schisterman, E. F., Lyon, N. R., & Rogers, B. T. (2000). Extreme prematurity and school outcomes. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology 14, 324–331.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Comeau, L., Genesee, F., & Lapaquette, L. (2003). The modeling hypothesis and child bilingual code mixing. International Journal of Bilingualism 7, 113–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummins, J., & Mulcahy, R. (1978). Orientation to language in Ukrainian–English bilingual children. Child Development 49, 1239–1242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, D., Jergovic, D., Imami, Z., & Theodos, V. (1997). Monolingual and bilingual children's use of the mutual exclusivity constraint. Journal of Child Language 24, 3–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, D. M. (2007). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test. Bloomington, MN: NCS Pearson Inc.Google Scholar
Feyereisen, P. (2006). Further investigation on the mnemonic effect of gestures: their meaning matters. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 18, 185–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furth, S. L., Garg, P. P., Neu, A. M., Hwang, W., Fivush, B. A., & Powe, N. R. (2000). Racial differences in access to the kidney transplant waiting list for children and adolescents with end-stage renal disease. Pediatrics 106, 756–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garvey, C., & Caramazza, A. (1974). Implicit causality in verbs. Linguistic Inquiry 5, 549–564.Google Scholar
Genesee, F., Tucker, G. R., & Lambert, W. E. (1975). Communication skills of bilingual children. Child Development 46, 1010–1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodrich Smith, W., & Hudson Kam, C. L. (2012). Knowing ‘who she is’ based on ‘where she is’: the effect of co-speech gesture on pronoun comprehension. Language and Cognition 4, 75–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, P. C., Grosz, B. J., & Gilliam, L. A. (1993). Pronouns, names, and the centering of attention in discourse. Cognitive Science 17, 311–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hackman, D., & Farah, M. J. (2009). Socioeconomic status and the developing brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13, 65–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hartshorne, J. K., Nappa, R., & Snedeker, J. (2011). Ambiguous pronoun processing development: probably not U-shaped. Paper presented at the 35th Annual Boston University Child Language Conference.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M., Dryer, M. S., Gil, D., & Comrie, B. (eds) (2008). WALS online. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library.Google Scholar
Hoff, E. (2003). The specificity of environmental influence: socioeconomic status affects early vocabulary development via maternal speech. Child Development 74, 1368–1378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holle, H., & Gunter, T. C. (2007). The role of iconic gestures in speech disambiguation: ERP evidence. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 19, 1175–1192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kelly, S. D., Barr, D. J., Church, R. B., & Lynch, K. (1999). Offering a hand to pragmatic understanding: the role of speech and gesture in comprehension and memory. Journal of Memory and Language 40, 577–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, S. D., Özyürek, A., & Maris, E. (2010). Two sides of the same coin: speech and gesture mutually interact to enhance comprehension. Psychological Science 21, 260–267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture: visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: what gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Obermeier, C., Dolk, T., & Gunter, T. C. (2012). The benefit of gestures during communication: evidence from hearing and hearing-impaired individuals. Cortex 48, 857–870.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pyykkönen, P., Matthews, D., & Jarvikivi, J. (2010). Three-year-olds are sensitive to semantic prominence during online language comprehension: a visual world study of pronoun resolution. Language and Cognitive Processes 25, 115–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rathore, S. S., Masoudi, F. A., Wang, Y., Curtis, J. P., Foody, J. M., Havranek, E. P., & Krumholz, H. M. (2006). Socioeconomic status, treatment, and outcomes among elderly patients hospitalized with heart failure: findings from the National Heart Failure Project. American Heart Journal 152, 371–378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rogers, W. T. (1978). The contribution of kinesic illustrators toward the comprehension of verbal behavior within utterances. Human Communication Research 5, 54–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serratrice, L. (2007). Referential cohesion in the narratives of bilingual English–Italian children and monolingual peers. Journal of Pragmatics 39, 1058–1087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegal, M., Iozzi, L., & Surian, L. (2009). Bilingualism and conversational understanding. Cognition 110, 115–122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Siewierska, A. (2005). Gender distinctions in independent personal pronouns. In Haspelmath, M., Dryer, M. S., Gil, D., & Comrie, B. (eds), The world atlas of language structures, (182–185). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
So, W. C., Coppola, M., Licciardello, V., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2005). The seeds of spatial grammar in the manual modality. Cognitive Science 29, 1029–1043.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Song, H., & Fisher, C. (2007). Discourse prominence effects on 2·5-year-old children's interpretation of pronouns. Lingua 117, 1959–1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, L. A., & Massaro, D. W. (1994). Children's integration of speech and pointing gestures in comprehension. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 57, 327–354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ward, M. M. (2008). Socioeconomic status and the incidence of ESRD. American Journal of Kidney Diseases 51, 563–572.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Westenberg, P. M., Siebelink, B. M., Warmenhoven, N. J. C., & Treffers, P. D. A. (1999). Separation anxiety and overanxious disorders: relations to age and level of psychosocial maturity. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 38, 1000–1007.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yow, W. Q. (2013). Monolingual and bilingual children's use of gestures and grammatical agreement in pronoun interpretation. In Baiz, S., Goldman, N., & Hawkes, R. (eds), Proceedings of the 37th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, Vol. 2 (pp. 482–494). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Yow, W. Q., & Markman, E. M. (2011a). Young bilingual children's heightened sensitivity to referential cues. Journal of Cognition and Development 1, 12–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yow, W. Q., & Markman, E. M. (2011b). Bilingualism and children's use of paralinguistic cues to interpret emotion in speech. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 14, 562–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yow, W. Q., & Markman, E. M. (2014). A bilingual advantage in how children integrate multiple cues to understand a speaker's referential intent. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition online: CJO2014. doi:10.1017/S1366728914000133.Google Scholar