Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T13:47:20.220Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

McNeill David, The conceptual basis of language. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Eribaum Associates, 1979. Pp. xiii + 306.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Sue Foster
Affiliation:
Linguistics DepartmentUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos Angeles, Ca. 90007

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bruner, J. S. (1975). The ontogenesis of speech acts. JChLang 2. 119.Google Scholar
Chapin, G., Smith, T. S. & Abrahamson, A. A. (1972). Two factors in perceptual segmentation of speech. JVLVB 11. 164–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, H. & Clark, E. (1977). Psychology and language. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A. & Bever, T. G. (1965). The psychological reality of linguistic segments. JVLVB 4. 414–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fromkin, V. A. (1971). The non-anomalous nature of anomalous utterances. Lg 47. 2752.Google Scholar
Greenfield, P. M. (1978). Structural parallels between language and action in development. In Lock, A. J. (ed.), Action, gesture and symbol: the emergence of language. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1975). Learning how to mean. London: Edward Arnold.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarvella, R. J. (1971). Syntactic processing of connected speech. JVLVB 10. 409–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lock, A. J. (1980). The guided reinvention of language. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Menn, L. (1973). On the origin and growth of phonological and syntactic rules. Papers from the 9th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 378–85.Google Scholar