Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T21:22:37.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Locals don't have accents: children weigh phonological proficiency over syntactic or semantic proficiency when categorizing individuals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 March 2018

Hyesung G. HWANG Open the ORCID record for Hyesung G. HWANG [Opens in a new window]  and
Lori MARKSON
Hyesung G. HWANG*
Affiliation:
Washington University in St Louis, USA
Lori MARKSON
Affiliation:
Washington University in St Louis, USA
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Children categorize native-accented speakers as local and non-native-accented speakers as foreign, suggesting they use accent (i.e., phonological proficiency) to determine social group membership. However, it is unclear if accent is the strongest – and only – group marker children use to determine social group membership, or whether other aspects of language, such as syntax and semantics, are also important markers. To test this, five- to eight-year-old monolingual English-speaking children were asked to judge whether individuals who varied in phonological, syntactic, and semantic proficiency were local or foreign. Children were also asked which individual they wanted as a friend. Children prioritized phonological proficiency over syntactic and semantic proficiency to determine social group membership. However, with age, children begin to shift toward prioritizing syntactic and semantic proficiency over phonological proficiency in their friendship decisions, suggesting that the capacity to integrate different aspects of a speaker's linguistic proficiency changes with development.

Keywords

Language DevelopmentAccent PerceptionSocial Cognition
Type
Brief Research Reports
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 45 , Issue 4 , July 2018 , pp. 1018 - 1034
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412.Google Scholar
Baker, M. C. (2002). The atoms of language: the mind's hidden rules of grammar. New York: Basic books.Google Scholar
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2016). lme4: linear mixed-effects models using ‘eigen’ and s4 [Computer software manual]. Retrieved from <https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4> (R package version 1.1-12).+(R+package+version+1.1-12).>Google Scholar
Bent, T. (2014). Children's perception of foreign-accented words. Journal of Child Language, 41(6), 1334–55.Google Scholar
Chomsky, C. (1969). The acquisition of syntax in children from 5 to 10. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, E. (2012). The evolution of tag-based cooperation in humans: the case for accent. Current Anthropology, 53(5), 588–616.Google Scholar
Dobson, A. J. (2002). An Introduction to Generalized Linear Models, 2nd edn. Boca Raton, FL: CRC press.Google Scholar
Dunham, Y., Baron, A. S., & Banaji, M. R. (2008). The development of implicit intergroup cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(7), 248–53.Google Scholar
Floccia, C., Butler, J., Girard, F., & Goslin, J. (2009). Categorization of regional and foreign accent in 5- to 7-year-old British children. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 33, 366–75.Google Scholar
Gluszek, A., & Dovidio, J. F. (2010). The way they speak: a social psychological perspective on the stigma of non-native accents in communication. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(2), 214–37.Google Scholar
Hawkins, R. (2001). Second language syntax. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hazan, V., & Barrett, S. (2000). The development of phonemic categorization in children aged 6–12. Journal of Phonetics, 28(4), 377–96.Google Scholar
Herschensohn, J. (2000). The second time around: Minimalism and L2 acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.Google Scholar
Hirschfeld, L. A., & Gelman, S. A. (1997). What young children think about the relationship between language variation and social difference. Cognitive Development, 12(2), 213–38.Google Scholar
Hothorn, T., Bretz, F., & Westfall, P. (2008). Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biometric Journal, 50, 346–63.Google Scholar
Johnson, J. S., & Newport, E. L. (1989). Critical period effects in second language learning: the influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology, 21(1), 60–99.Google Scholar
Kinzler, K. D., Corriveau, K. H., & Harris, P. L. (2011). Children's selective trust in native-accented speakers. Developmental Science, 14(1), 106–11.Google Scholar
Kinzler, K. D., & DeJesus, J. M. (2013). Children's sociolinguistic evaluations of nice foreigners and mean Americans. Developmental Psychology, 49(4), 655–64.Google Scholar
Kinzler, K. D., Dupoux, E., & Spelke, E. S. (2007). The native language of social cognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(30), 12577–80.Google Scholar
Kinzler, K. D., Shutts, K., DeJesus, J., & Spelke, E. S. (2009). Accent trumps race in guiding children's social preferences. Social Cognition, 27(4), 623–34.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Long, M. (1991) An introduction to second language acquisition research. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Nagy, W. (2007). Metalinguistic awareness and the vocabulary-comprehension connection. In Wagner, R. K., Muse, A., & Tannenbaum, K. (Eds.), Vocabulary acquisition: implications for reading comprehension (pp. 52–77). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Pietraszewski, D., & Schwartz, A. (2014). Evidence that accent is a dedicated dimension of social categorization, not a byproduct of coalitional categorization. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35(1), 51–7.Google Scholar
Rutland, A., Cameron, L., Milne, A., & McGeorge, P. (2005). Social norms and self-presentation: children's implicit and explicit intergroup attitudes. Child Development, 76(2), 451–66.Google Scholar
Sobel, D. M., & Macris, D. M. (2013). Children's understanding of speaker reliability between lexical and syntactic knowledge. Developmental Psychology, 49(3), 523–32.Google Scholar
Stephens, E. C., & Koenig, M. A. (2015). Varieties of testimony: children's selective learning in semantic versus episodic domains. Cognition, 137, 182–8.Google Scholar
van Hout, R. (Ed.) (2003). The lexicon-syntax interface in second language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Wagner, L., Clopper, C. G., & Pate, J. K. (2014). Children's perception of dialect variation. Journal of Child Language, 41(5), 1062–84.Google Scholar
Weatherhead, D., White, K. S., & Friedman, O. (2016). Where are you from? Preschoolers infer background from accent. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 143, 171–8.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Hwang and Markson supplementary material

Hwang and Markson supplementary material 1

Download Hwang and Markson supplementary material(File)
File 119 KB