Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T03:37:01.431Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Learning how to ask: patterns of inversion in yes–no and wh-questions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Anne Erreich
Anne Erreich
Affiliation:
Queens Hospital Center Affiliation of Long Island Jewish–Hillside Medical Center
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study attempts to determine whether subject–auxiliary inversion occurs in yes–no questions before wh-questions and whether non-inversion errors (when daddy will come home?) are a characteristic feature of the acquisition of wh-questions. The data consist of the yes–no and wh-questions of 18 children, aged 2;5 to 3;0 with an mlu range of 2.66–4.26. Findings do not support previous claims that inversion is acquired in yes–no questions before wh-questions. Rather, a significant number of children were found to use an optional inversion rule in both question types. This fact appears to account for the finding that non-inversion errors are a characteristic feature of the acquisition of wh-questions.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 11 , Issue 3 , October 1984 , pp. 579 - 592
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bellugi, U. (1965). The development of interrogative structures in children's speech. In Riegel, K. (ed.), The development of language functions. University of Michigan Language Development Program, Report No. 8, 103–38.Google Scholar
Bellugi, U. (1971). Simplification in children's language. In Huxley, R. & Ingram, E. (eds), Language acquisition: models and methods. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D. (1971). Inherent variability and variable rules, FL 7. 457–92.Google Scholar
Bloom, L., Hood, L. & Lightbown, P. (1974). Imitation in language development: if, when and why. CogPsychol 6. 380–421.Google Scholar
Brown, R. (1973). A first language: the early stages. Cambridge; Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R., Cazden, C. & Bellugi, U. (1969). The childés grammar from I to III. In Hill, J. P. (ed.), Minnesota Symposium on Child Psychology, Vol. 2. Minneapolis, Minn.: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Brown, R. & Hanlon, C. (1970). Derivational complexity and order of acquisition. In Hayes, J. R. (ed.), Cognition and the development of language. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Crystal, D. (1979). Prosodic development. In Fletcher, P. & Garman, M. (eds), Language acquisition. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Erreich, A. (1981). The acquisition of inversion in wh-questions: what evidence the child uses? Unpublished doctoral dissertation, C.U.N.Y. Graduate Center.Google Scholar
Erreich, A., Valian, V. & Winzemer, J. (1980). Aspects of a theory of language acquisition. JChLang 7. 157–79.Google ScholarPubMed
Ingram, D. & Tyack, D. (1979). Inversion of subject NP and Aux in children's questions. JPsycholingRes 4. 333–41.Google Scholar
Klima, E. S. & Bellugi, U. (1966). Syntactic regularities in the speech of children. In Lyons, J. & Wales, R. J. (eds), Psycholinguistics papers. Edinburgh: University Press.Google Scholar
Kuczaj, S. A. & Brannick, N. (1979). Children's use of the wh-question modal auxiliary placement rule. JExpChPsychol 6. 563–79.Google Scholar
Labov, W. & Labov, T. (1976). Learning the syntax of questions. Paper delivered to the Conference on Psychology of Language.Stirling, Scotland.Google Scholar
Maratsos, M. (1978). New models in linguistics and language acquisition. In Halle, M., Bresnan, J. & Miller, G. A (eds), Linguistic theory and psychological reality. Cambridge.: Mass.: M.I.TGoogle Scholar
Maratsos, M. (1979). How to get from words to sentences. In Aaronson, D. & Reiber, R. (eds), Perspectives in psycholinguistics. Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Maratsos, M., Kuczaj, S., Fox, D. & Chalkley, M. (1979). Some empirical studies on the acquisition of transformational relations: passives, negatives, and one past tense. Minnesota Symposium on Child Psychology, Vol. 12. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Menyuk, P. (1969). Sentences children use. Cambridge.: Mass.M.I.T.Google Scholar
Valian, V., Winzemer, J. & Erreich, A. (1981). A little-linguist model for learning syntax. In Tavakolian, S. (ed.), Language acquisition and linguistic theory. Cambrige. Mass.: M.I.T.Google Scholar