No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
J. Weissenborn, H. Goodluck & T. Roeper (eds), Theoretical issues in language acquisition: continuity and change in development. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1992. Pp. x + 321.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 September 2008
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/78b58/78b5831e55847cbf3830a0bcb06c9342f71a2bbf" alt="Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'"
- Type
- Reviews
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993
References
REFERENCES
Borer, H. & Wexler, K. (1987). The maturation of syntax. In Roeper, T. & Williams, E. (eds), Parameter setting. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Bowerman, M. (1982). Reorganisational processes in lexical and syntactic development. In Wanner, E. & Gleitman, L. (eds), Language acquisition: the state of the art. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, J. & Rosen, C. (1990). Knowledge and obedience: the developmental status of the binding theory. Linguistic Inquiry 21, 187–222.Google Scholar
Hyams, N. (1986). Language acquisition and the theory of parameters. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingham, R. (1992). The optional subject phenomenon in young children's English: a case study. Journal of Child Language 19, 133–51.Google Scholar
Mazurkevitch, I. & White, L. (1984). The acquisition of the dative alternation: unlearning overgeneralisations. Cognition 16, 261–83.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (1984). Language learnability and language development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (1989). Learnability and cognition: the acquisition of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
Radford, A. (1990). Syntactic theory and the acquisition of English syntax. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar