Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T19:34:29.830Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Italian Words and Sentences MB-CDI: normative data and concordance between complete and short forms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2019

Pasquale RINALDI Open the ORCID record for Pasquale RINALDI [Opens in a new window] ,
Patrizio PASQUALETTI ,
Silvia STEFANINI ,
Arianna BELLO  and
Maria Cristina CASELLI
Pasquale RINALDI*
Affiliation:
Italian National Research Council, Institute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies, Italy
Patrizio PASQUALETTI
Affiliation:
Italian National Research Council, Institute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies, Italy Service of Medical Statistics and Information Technology, Fatebenefratelli Foundation for Health Research and Education, AFaR Division, Italy
Silvia STEFANINI
Affiliation:
Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale di Parma-Distretto di Fidenza, Dipartimento di Salute Mentale e Dipendenze Patologiche- Servizio di Neuropsichiatria dell'Infanzia e dell'Adolescenza
Arianna BELLO
Affiliation:
Università degli Studi Roma Tre, Dipartimento di Scienze della Formazione
Maria Cristina CASELLI
Affiliation:
Italian National Research Council, Institute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies, Italy
*
*Corresponding author. Italian National Research Council, Institute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies, Italy, Via Nomentana, 56 00161 Roma. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

One of the most popular and widely used parent report instruments for assessing early language acquisition is the MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories (MB-CDI). This study compares normative data of the Italian Words and Sentences complete form (WS-CF) and short form (WS-SF). The samples included 752 children for the WS-CF and 816 children for the WS-SF designed for children aged 18–36 months. The concordance between WS-SF and WS-CF is analyzed in a subgroup of 65 children. The results revealed strong correlations between WS-CF and WS-SF in both lexical and grammar skills as well as strong relationship between lexical and grammar skills. There was a high percentage agreement (97%) between the two forms for scores below the 10th percentile, suggesting that the two forms may be used interchangeably in order to describe vocabulary and grammatical development.

Keywords

Italian MacArthur-Bates CDIlanguage developmentvocabulary sizeearly grammar development
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 46 , Issue 3 , May 2019 , pp. 546 - 566
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bates, E., & Goodman, J. C. (2001). On the inseparability of grammar and the lexicon: evidence from acquisition. In Tomasello, M. & Bates, E. (Eds.), Essential readings in developmental psychology. Language development: the essential readings (pp. 134–62). Malden: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Bavin, E., Prior, M., Reilly, S., Bretherton, L., Williams, J., Eadie, P., Barrett, Y., & Ukoumunne, O. (2008). The Early Language in Victoria Study: predicting vocabulary at age one and two years from gesture and object use. Journal of Child Language, 35, 687–701.Google Scholar
Bello, A., Giannantoni, P., Pettenati, P., Stefanini, S., & Caselli, M. C. (2012). Assessing lexicon: validation and developmental data of the Picture Naming Game (PiNG), a new picture naming task for toddlers. International Journal of Language and Communicative Disorders, 47(5), 589–602.Google Scholar
Bello, A., Onofrio, D., & Caselli, M. C. (2014). Nouns and predicates comprehension and production in children with Down syndrome. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 35(4), 761–75.Google Scholar
Bello, A., Onofrio, D., Remi, L., & Caselli, M. C. (2018). Prediction and persistence of late talking: a study of Italian toddlers at 29 and 34 months. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 75, 40–8.Google Scholar
Bleses, D., Vach, W., Slott, M., Wehberg, S., Thomsen, P., Madsen, T., & Basboll, H. (2008). The Danish Communicative Developmental Inventories: validity and main developmental trends. Journal of Child Language, 35, 651–69.Google Scholar
Braginsky, M., Yurovsky, D., Marchman, V. A., & Frank, M. C. (2015). Developmental changes in the relationship between grammar and the lexicon. In Noelle, D. C., Dale, R., Warlaumont, A. S., Yoshimi, J., Matlock, T., Jennings, C. D., & Maglio, P. P. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 256–61). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Caselli, M. C., Bates, E., Casadio, P., Fenson, J., Fenson, L., Sanderl, L., & Weir, J. (1995). A cross-linguistic study of early lexical development. Cognitive Development, 10(2), 159–99.Google Scholar
Caselli, M. C., Bello, A., Rinaldi, P., Stefanini, S., & Pasqualetti, P. (2015). Il Primo Vocabolario del Bambino: Gesti, Parole e Frasi. Valori di riferimento fra 8 e 36 mesi delle Forme complete e delle Forme brevi del questionario MacArthur-Bates CDI. Milan: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
Caselli, M. C., & Casadio, P. (1995). Il Primo Vocabolario del Bambino. Guida all'uso del questionario MacArthur per la valutazione della comunicazione e del linguaggio nei primi anni di vita. Milan: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
Caselli, M. C., Casadio, P., & Bates, E. (1999). A comparison of the transition from first words to grammar in English and Italian. Journal of Child Language, 26(1), 69–111.Google Scholar
Caselli, M. C., Rinaldi, P., Stefanini, S., & Volterra, V. (2012). Early action and gesture ‘vocabulary’ and its relation with word comprehension and production. Child Development, 83, 526–42.Google Scholar
Caselli, M. C., Vicari, S., Longobardi, E., Lami, L., Pizzoli, C., & Stella, G. (1998). Gestures and words in early development of children with Down syndrome. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41(5), 1125–35.Google Scholar
Cattani, A., Bonifacio, S., Fertz, M., Iverson, J. M., Zocconi, E., & Caselli, M. C. (2010). Communicative and linguistic development in preterm children: a longitudinal study from 12 to 24 months. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 45(2), 162–73.Google Scholar
Charman, T., Drew, A., Baird, C., & Baird, G. (2003). Measuring early language development in preschool children with autism spectrum disorder using the MacArthur Communicative Development Inventory (Infant Form). Journal of Child Language, 30, 213–36.Google Scholar
Collisson, B. A., Graham, S. A., Preston, J. L., Rose, M. S., McDonald, S., & Tough, S. (2016). Risk and protective factors for late talking: an epidemiologic investigation. Journal of Pediatrics, 172, 168–74.Google Scholar
Conboy, B. T., & Thal, D. J. (2006). Ties between the lexicon and grammar: cross-sectional and longitudinal studies of bilingual toddlers. Child Development, 77, 712–35.Google Scholar
Cozzani, F., Usai, M. C., & Zanobini, M. (2013). Linguistic abilities and executive function in the third year of life. Rivista Italiana di psicolinguistica Applicata/Applied Psycholinguistic, 13, 25–43.Google Scholar
D'Odorico, L., Carubbi, S., Salerni, N., & Calvo, V. (2001). Vocabulary development in Italian children: a longitudinal evaluation of quantitative and qualitative aspects. Journal of Child Language, 28, 351–72.Google Scholar
D'Odorico, L., & Fasolo, M. (2007). Nouns and verbs in the vocabulary acquisition of Italian children. Journal of Child Language, 34(4), 891–907.Google Scholar
Dale, P. S., Bates, E., Reznick, J. S., & Morisset, C. E. (1989). The validity of a parent report instrument of child language at twenty months. Journal of Child Language, 16(2), 239–49.Google Scholar
Dale, P. S., & Goodman, J. C. (2005). Commonality and individual differences in vocabulary growth. In Tomasello, M. & Slobin, D. I. (Eds.), Beyond nature–nurture: essays in honor of Elizabeth Bates (pp. 41–78). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Deckers, S. R. J. M., Van Zaalen, Y., Mens, E. J. M., Van Balkom, H., & Verhoeven, L. (2016). The concurrent and predictive validity of the Dutch version of the Communicative Development Inventory in children with Down syndrome for the assessment of expressive vocabulary in verbal and signed modalities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 56, 99–107.Google Scholar
Desmarais, C., Sylvestre, A., Meyer, F., Bairati, I., & Rouleau, N. (2008). Systematic review of the literature on characteristics of late-talking toddlers. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 43, 361–89.Google Scholar
Devescovi, A., Caselli, M. C., Marchione, D., Pasqualetti, P., Reilly, J., & Bates, E. (2005). A cross-linguistic study of the relationship between grammar and lexical development. Journal of Child Language, 32(4), 759–86.Google Scholar
Doblhammer, D., Hoffmann, R., Muth, E., Westphal, C., & Kruse, A. (2009). A systematic literature review of studies analysing the effects of sex, age, education, marital status, obesity, and smoking on health transitions. Demographic Research, 20, 37–64.Google Scholar
Eriksson, M. (2001). Narratives validate communicative development inventories. Applied Psycholinguistics, 22(1), 45–60.Google Scholar
Eriksson, M. (2017). The Swedish Communicative Development Inventory III: parent reports on language in preschool children. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 41(5), 647–54.Google Scholar
Eriksson, M., Westerlund, M., & Berglund, E. (2002). A screening version of the Swedish Communicative Development Inventories designed for use with 18-month-old children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45, 948–60.Google Scholar
Feldman, H. M., Dale, P. S., Campbell, T. F., Colborn, D. K., Jurs-Lasky, M., Rockette, H. E., & Paradise, J. L. (2005). Concurrent and predictive validity of parent reports of child language at ages 2 and 3 years. Child Development, 76(4), 856–68.Google Scholar
Fenson, L., Dale, P., Reznick, J. S., Thal, D., Bates, E., Hartung, J., Pethick, S., & Reilly, J. (1993). MacArthur Communicative Development Inventories (CDI). San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Fenson, L., Marchman, V., Thal, D., Dale, P., Reznick, S., & Bates, E. (2007). MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories: user's guide and technical manual (2nd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
Fenson, L., Pethick, S., Renda, C., Cox, J. L., Dale, P. S., & Reznick, J. S. (2000). Short form versions of the Communicative Development Inventories. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21, 95–116.Google Scholar
Fernald, A., Perfors, A., & Marchman, V. A. (2006). Picking up speed in understanding: speech processing efficiency and vocabulary growth across the second year. Developmental Psychology, 42, 98–116.Google Scholar
Frank, M. C., Braginsky, M., Yurovsky, D., & Marchman, V. A. (2017). Wordbank: an open repository for developmental vocabulary data. Journal of Child Language, 44(3), pp. 677–94.Google Scholar
Frota, S., Butler, J., Correia, S., Severino, C., Vicente, S., & Vigário, M. (2016). Infant communicative development assessed with the European Portuguese MacArthur–Bates Communicative Development Inventories short forms. First Language, 36(5), 525–45.Google Scholar
Gatt, D., Grech, H., & Dodd, B. (2014). Early expressive vocabulary skills: a multi-method approach to measurement. First Language, 34, 136–54.Google Scholar
Hawa, V. V., & Spanoudis, G. (2014). Toddlers with delayed expressive language: an overview of the characteristics, risk factors and language outcomes. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 35(2), 400–7.Google Scholar
Jackson-Maldonado, T. D., Marchman, V. A., Bates, E., & Gutienez-Clennen, V. (1993). Early lexical development in Spanish-speaking infants and toddlers. Journal of Child Language, 20(3), 523–49.Google Scholar
Jackson-Maldonado, T. D., Marchman, V. A., & Fernald, L. C. H. (2013). Short-form versions of the Spanish MacArthur–Bates Communicative Development Inventories. Applied Psycholinguistics, 34(4), 837–68.Google Scholar
Kern, S., Langue, J., Zesiger, P., & Bovet, F. (2010). Adaptations françaises des versions courtes des inventaires du développement communicatif de MacArthur-Bates. ANAE, 22, 107–8.Google Scholar
Kim, S. W., Jeon, H. R., Park, E. J., Kim, H. I., Jung, D. W., & Woo, M. R. (2014). The Usefulness of M-B CDI-K Short Form as screening test in children with language developmental delay. Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine, 38(3), 376–80.Google Scholar
Law, J., & Roy, P. (2008). Parental report of infant language skills: a review of the development and application of the Communicative Development Inventories. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 13, 198–206.Google Scholar
Marchman, V., & Bates, E. (1994). Continuity in lexical and morphological development: a test of the critical mass hypothesis. Journal of Child Language, 21, 339–66.Google Scholar
Marchman, V., & Thal, D. (2005). Words and grammar. In Tomasello, M. & Slobin, D. (Eds.), Beyond nature–nurture: essays in honor of Elizabeth Bates (pp. 141–64). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Marjanovic˘-Umek, L., Fekonja-Peklaj, U., & Podlesek, A. (2013). Characteristics of early vocabulary and grammar development in Slovenian-speaking infants and toddlers: a CDI-adaptation study. Journal of Child Language, 40(4), 779–98.Google Scholar
O'Toole, C., & Fletcher, P. (2010). Validity of a parent report instrument for Irish-speaking toddlers. First Language, 30, 199–217.Google Scholar
O'Toole, C., Gatt, D., Hickey, T. M., Mieksz, A., Haman, E., Armon-Lotem, S., Rinker, T., Ohana, O., dos Santos, C., & Kern, S. (2017). Parent report of early lexical production in bilingual children across varied contexts: a CDI study. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 20(2), 124–45.Google Scholar
Pan, B. A., Rowe, M. L., Spier, E., & Tamis-LeMonda, C. (2004). Measuring productive vocabulary of toddlers in low-income families: concurrent and predictive validity of three sources of data. Journal of Child Language, 31(3), 587–608.Google Scholar
Pérez-Pereira, M., & Resches, M. (2011). Concurrent and predictive validity of the Galician CDI. Journal of Child Language, 38(1), 121–40.Google Scholar
Reese, E, & Read, S. (2000). Predictive validity of the New Zealand MacArthur Communicative Development Inventory: Words and Sentences. Journal of Child Language, 27(2), 255–66.Google Scholar
Rescorla, L. A., & Dale, P. S. (Eds.) (2013). Late talkers: language development, interventions, and outcomes. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
Reznick, J. S., & Goldfield, B. A. (1994). Diary vs. representative checklist assessment of productive vocabulary. Journal of Child Language, 21, 465–72.Google Scholar
Rigby, R. A., & Stasinopoulos, D. M. (2004). Smooth centile curves for skew and kurtotic data modelled using the Box-Cox Power Exponential distribution. Statistics in Medicine, 23, 3053–76.Google Scholar
Rinaldi, P., Baruffaldi, F., Burdo, S., & Caselli, M. C. (2013). Linguistic and pragmatic skills in toddlers with cochlear implant. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 48, 715–25.Google Scholar
Rinaldi, P., & Caselli, M. C. (2009). Lexical and grammatical abilities in deaf Italian preschoolers: the role of duration of formal language experience. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 14, 63–75.Google Scholar
Rinaldi, P., & Caselli, M. C. (2014). Language development in a bimodal bilingual child with cochlear implant: a longitudinal study. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17, 798–809.Google Scholar
Ring, E. D., & Fenson, L. (2000). The correspondence between parent report and child performance for receptive and expressive vocabulary beyond infancy. First Language, 20, 141–59.Google Scholar
Sansavini, A., Bello, A., Guarini, A., Savini, S., Stefanini, S., & Caselli, M. C. (2010). Early development of gestures, actions, word comprehension and word production and their relationships in Italian infants: a longitudinal study. Gesture, 10(1), 52–83.Google Scholar
Sansavini, A., Guarini, A., Savini, S., Broccoli, S., Justice, L., Alessandroni, R., & Faldella, G. (2011). Longitudinal trajectories of gestural and linguistic abilities in very preterm children in the second year of life. Neuropsychologia, 49, 3677–88.Google Scholar
Stolt, S., Haataja, L., Lapinleimu, H., & Lehtonen, L. (2008). Early lexical development of Finnish children: a longitudinal study. First Language, 28(3), 259–79.Google Scholar
Stolt, S., Savini, S., Guarini, A., Caselli, M. C., Matomäki, J., Lapinleimu, H., Haataja, L., Lehtonen, L., Alessandroni, R., Faldella, G., & Sansavini, A. (2017). Does the native language influence lexical composition in very preterm children at the age of two years? A cross-linguistic comparison study of Italian and Finnish children. First Language, 37(4), 368–90.Google Scholar
Tardif, T., Fletcher, P., Liang, W., & Kaciroti, N. (2009). Early vocabulary in Mandarin (Putonghua) and Cantonese. Journal of Child Language, 36, 1115–44.Google Scholar
Tardif, T., Fletcher, P., Zhang, Z. X., Liang, W. L., & Zuo, Q. H. (2008). Chinese Communicative Development Inventories (Putonghua and Cantonese versions): User's guide and manual. Beijing: Peking University Medical Press.Google Scholar
Thal, D., DesJardin, J. L., & Eisenberg, L. S. (2007). Validity of the MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories for measuring language abilities in children with cochlear implants. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 16, 54–64.Google Scholar
Thal, D., Jackson-Maldonado, D., & Acosta, D. (2000). Validity of a parent-report measure of vocabulary and grammar for Spanish-speaking toddlers. Journal of Speech, Language, & Hearing Research, 43(5), 1087–100.Google Scholar
Trudeau, N., & Sutton, A. (2011). Expressive vocabulary and early grammar of 16- to 30-month-old children acquiring Quebec French. First Language, 31, 480–507.Google Scholar
Usai, M. C., Garello, V., & Viterbori, P. (2009). Temperamental profiles and linguistic development: differences in the quality of linguistic production in relation to temperament in children of 28 months. Infant Behavior and Development, 32, 322–30.Google Scholar
Vach, W., Bleses, D., & Jørgensen, R. (2010). Construction of a Danish CDI short form for language screening at the age of 36 months: methodological considerations and results. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 24, 602–21.Google Scholar
Vicari, S., Caselli, M. C., Gagliardi, C., Tonucci, F., & Volterra, V. (2002). Language acquisition in special populations: a comparison between Down and Williams Syndromes. Neuropsychologia, 40(13), 2461–70.Google Scholar
Wallace, I. F., Berkman, N. D., Watson, L. R., Coyne-Beasley, T., Wood, C. T., Cullen, K., & Lohr, K. N. (2015). Screening for speech and language delay in children 5 years old and younger: a systematic review. Pediatrics, 136(2), e448–e462.Google Scholar
Westerlund, M., Berglund, E., & Eriksson, M. (2006). Can severely language delayed 3-year-olds be identified at 18 months? Evaluation of a screening version of the MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49, 237–47.Google Scholar
Zampini, L., & D'Odorico, L. (2011). Gesture production and language development: a longitudinal study of children with Down syndrome. Gesture, 11, 174–93.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Rinaldi et al. supplementary material

Rinaldi et al. supplementary material 1

Download Rinaldi et al. supplementary material(File)
File 2 MB