Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T04:30:56.315Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interactions between lexical and phonological development: cross-linguistic and contextual considerations – a commentary on Stoel-Gammon's ‘Relationships between lexical and phonological development in young children’*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 October 2010

KATHERINE DEMUTH
KATHERINE DEMUTH*
Affiliation:
Macquarie University
*
Address for correspondence: Centre for Language Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2019, Australia. e-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Stoel-Gammon (this issue) provides a welcome addition to the phonological acquisition literature, bringing together insights from long-standing and more recent research to address the relationship between the developing phonological system and the developing lexicon. A growing literature on children's early use of words across languages and phonological contexts provides additional insight into the nature of the interactions between phonological and lexical development, suggesting that learners' knowledge and connection of the two may develop much earlier than often thought. This commentary highlights some of these exciting results from recent cross-linguistic research on development between the ages of 1 and 3.

Type
Review Article and Commentaries
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 38 , Issue 1 , January 2011 , pp. 69 - 74
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[*]

I thank Philip Dale, Jae Yung Song and Rachel Theodore for helpful comments and suggestions.

References

REFERENCES

Demuth, K. (2009). The prosody of syllables, words and morphemes. In Bavin, E. (ed.), Cambridge handbook on child language, 183–98. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demuth, K., Culbertson, J. & Alter, J. (2006). Word-minimality, epenthesis, and coda licensing in the acquisition of English. Language and Speech 49, 137–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Demuth, K. & Ellis, D. (2009). Revisiting the acquisition of Sesotho noun class prefixes. In Guo, J., Lieven, E., Budwig, N., Ervin-Tripp, S., Nakamura, K. & Ozçalikan, S. (eds), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Festschrift for Dan Slobin, 93–104. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Demuth, K. & Johnson, M. (2003). Truncation to subminimal words in early French. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 48, 211–41.Google Scholar
Demuth, K. & McCullough, E. (2009). The prosodic (re)organization of children's early English articles. Journal of Child Language 36, 173–200.Google Scholar
Demuth, K., Patrolia, M., Song, J. Y. & Masapollo, M. (in press). The development of articles in children's early Spanish: prosodic interactions between lexical and grammatical form. First Language.Google Scholar
Demuth, K. & Tremblay, A. (2008). Prosodically-conditioned variability in children's production of French determiners. Journal of Child Language 35, 99–127.Google Scholar
Fikkert, P. (1994). On the acquisition of prosodic structure. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Leiden.Google Scholar
Gerken, L. (1996). Prosodic structure in young children's language production. Language 72, 683–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsieh, L., Leonard, L. B. & Swanson, L. (1999). Some differences between English plural noun inflections and third singular verb inflections in the input: the contributions of frequency, sentence position, and duration. Journal of Child Language, 26(3), 531–43.Google Scholar
Kirk, C. & Demuth, K. (2006). Accounting for variability in 2-year-olds' production of coda consonants. Language Learning and Development 2, 97–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levelt, C. C., Schiller, N. O. & Levelt, W. J. (2000). The acquisition of syllable types. Language Acquisition 8, 237–64.Google Scholar
Lleó, C. (2006). The acquisition of prosodic word structures in Spanish by monolingual and Spanish–German bilingual children. Language and Speech 49, 207–231.Google Scholar
Lleó, C. & Prinz, M. (1996). Consonant clusters in child phonology and the directionality of syllable structure assignment. Journal of Child Language 23, 31–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Macken, M. A. & Barton, D. (1980). The acquisition of the voicing contrast in Spanish: a phonetic and phonological study of word-initial stop consonants. Journal of Child Language 7, 433–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pater, J. (1997). Minimal violation and phonological development. Language Acquisition 6, 201–253.Google Scholar
Prieto, P. (2006). The relevance of metrical information in early prosodic word acquisition: a comparison of Catalan and Spanish. Language and Speech 49(2), 231–59.Google Scholar
Roark, B. & Demuth, K. (2000). Prosodic constraints and the learner's environment: a corpus study. In Howell, S. C., Fish, S. A. & Keith-Lucas, T. (eds), Proceedings of the 24th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 597–608. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Song, J. Y. & Demuth, K. (2008). Compensatory vowel lengthening for omitted coda consonants: a phonetic investigation of children's early representations of prosodic words. Language & Speech 51, 382–99.Google Scholar
Song, J. Y., Sundara, M. & Demuth, K. (2009). Phonological constraints on children's production of English third person singular -s. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 52(3), 623–42.Google Scholar
Theodore, R., Demuth, K. & Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (in press). Acoustic evidence for position and complexity effects on children's production of plural -s. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research.Google Scholar
Theodore, R., Demuth, K. & Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (in submission). Segmental and positional effects on children's coda production: comparing evidence from perceptual judgments and acoustic analysis.Google Scholar