Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T06:03:01.277Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Intentions help children learn meaningful rules*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 January 2008

SMADAR PATAEL  and
GIL DIESENDRUCK
SMADAR PATAEL
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology and Gonda Brain Research Center, Bar-Ilan University
GIL DIESENDRUCK*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology and Gonda Brain Research Center, Bar-Ilan University
*
Address for correspondence: Gil Diesendruck, Department of Psychology, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, 52900, Israel. Tel: 972-3-5318639. Fax: 972-3-5350206. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The present study investigated the roles of pattern detection capacities and understanding of intentions in children's learning of linguistic rules. We taught two-year-olds a Hebrew morphological distinction between noun and verb forms using two different training protocols. The protocols were identical in all parameters except that only in an Intentional, but not in a Control condition, were children introduced to the stimuli in an intentional communicative context. We found that children learned the morphological rule only in the Intentional condition. Thus, besides their pattern detection capacities, children's understanding of intentions substantially boosts their learning of meaningful rules.

Type
Brief Research Report
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 35 , Issue 1 , February 2008 , pp. 221 - 234
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baldwin, D. A. (1991). Infants' contribution to the achievement of joint reference. Child Development 62, 875–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berman, R. (2003). Children's lexical innovation. In Shimron, J. (ed.) Language processing and acquisition in languages of semantic, root based, morphology, 243–92. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Bloom, P. (2000). How children learn the meanings of words? Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bornstein, M. H., Cote, L. R., Maital, S., Painter, K., Park, S. Y., Pascual, L., Pecheux, M. G., Ruel, J., Venuti, P. & Vyt, A. (2004). Cross-linguistic analysis of vocabulary in young children: Spanish, Dutch, French, Hebrew, Italian, Korean, and American English. Child Development 75, 1115–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carpenter, M., Akhtar, N. & Tomasello, M. (1998). Fourteen- through 18-month-old infants differentially imitate intentional and accidental actions. Infant Behavior and Development 21, 315–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dienes, Z., Altmann, G. T. M. & Gao, S. J. (1999). Mapping across domains without feedback: A neural network model of transfer of implicit knowledge. Cognitive Science 23, 53–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diesendruck, G., Markson, L., Akhtar, N. & Reudor, A. (2004). Two-year-olds' sensitivity to speakers' intent: an alternative account of Samuelson and Smith. Developmental Science 7, 33–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diesendruck, G., Markson, L. & Bloom, P. (2003). Children's reliance on creator's intent in extending names for artifacts. Psychological Science 14, 164–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gentner, D. (1982). Why nouns are learned before verbs: Linguistic relativity versus natural partitioning. In Kuczaj, S. (ed.) Language development, Vol. 2, 301–34. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gomez, R. L. & Gerken, L. A. (1999). Artificial grammar learning by one-year-olds leads to specific and abstract knowledge. Cognition 70, 109–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaminski, J., Call, J. & Fischer, J. (2004). Word learning in a domestic dog: evidence for ‘fast mapping’. Science 304, 1682–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelemen, D. (2004). Are children ‘intuitive theists’? Psychological Science 15, 295–301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luo, Y. & Baillargeon, R. (2005). Can a self-propelled box have a goal? Psychological Science 16, 601–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Markman, E. & Abelev, M. (2004). Word learning in dogs? Trends in Cognitive Science 8, 479–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, C., Angelopoulos, M. & Bennett, P. (1999). Word learning in the context of referential and salience cues. Developmental Psychology 35, 60–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Naigles, L. R. (2002). Form is easy, meaning is hard: resolving a paradox in early child language. Cognition 86, 157–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saffran, J. R. (2002). Constraints on statistical language learning. Journal of Memory and Language 47, 172–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuelson, L. K. (2002). Statistical regularities in vocabulary guide language acquisition in connectionist models and 15–20-month-olds. Developmental Psychology 38, 1016–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schafer, G. & Plunkett, K. (1998). Rapid word learning by fifteen-month-olds under tightly controlled conditions. Child Development 69, 309–20.Google ScholarPubMed
Smith, L. B. (2003). Children's noun learning: How general learning processes make specialized learning mechanisms. In MacWhinney, B. (ed.) The emergence of language, 277–303. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google ScholarPubMed
Tardif, T., Shatz, M. & Naigles, L. (1997). Caregiver speech and children's use of nouns and verbs: A comparison of English, Italian and Mandarin. Journal of Child Language 24, 535–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. & Barton, M. (1994). Learning words in nonostensive contexts. Developmental Psychology 30, 639–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werker, J. F., Cohen, L. B., Lloyd, V. L., Casasola, M. & Stager, C. L. (1998). Acquisition of word-object associations by 14-month-old infants. Developmental Psychology 34, 1289–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, A. L. (1998). Infants selectively encode the goal object of an actor's reach. Cognition 69, 1–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed