Hostname: page-component-669899f699-chc8l Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-28T09:59:16.000Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Infant-directed speech as a simplified but not simple register: a longitudinal study of lexical and syntactic features

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2019

Giuliana GENOVESE ,
Maria SPINELLI ,
Leonor J. ROMERO LAURO ,
Tiziana AURELI ,
Giulia CASTELLETTI  and
Mirco FASOLO
Giuliana GENOVESE*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Milano Bicocca
Maria SPINELLI
Affiliation:
Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, University ‘G. d'Annunzio’, Chieti-Pescara, Italy
Leonor J. ROMERO LAURO
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Milano Bicocca
Tiziana AURELI
Affiliation:
Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, University ‘G. d'Annunzio’, Chieti-Pescara, Italy
Giulia CASTELLETTI
Affiliation:
Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, University ‘G. d'Annunzio’, Chieti-Pescara, Italy
Mirco FASOLO
Affiliation:
Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, University ‘G. d'Annunzio’, Chieti-Pescara, Italy
*
*Corresponding author: Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca – Psychology, Piazza dell'Ateneo Nuovo, 1 Milano20126, Italy. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Infant-directed speech (IDS) is a specific register that adults use to address infants, and it is characterised by prosodic exaggeration and lexical and syntactic simplification. Several authors have underlined that this simplified speech becomes more complex according to the infant's age. However, there is a lack of studies on lexical and syntactic modifications in Italian IDS during the first year of an infant's life. In the present study, 80 mother–infant dyads were longitudinally observed at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months during free-play interactions. Maternal vocal productions were subsequently coded. The results show an overall low lexical variability and syntactic complexity that identify speech to infants as a simplified register; however, the high occurrence of complex items and well-structured utterances suggests that IDS is not simple speech. Moreover, maternal IDS becomes more complex over time, but not linearly, with a maximum simplification in the second half of the first year.

Keywords

infant-directed speechmotheresematernal speech
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 47 , Special Issue 1: The Influence of Input Quality and Communicative Interaction on Language Development Part 1 , January 2020 , pp. 22 - 44
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Adi-Bensaid, L., Ben-David, A., & Tubul-Lavy, G. (2015). Content words in Hebrew child-directed speech. Infant Behavior and Development, 40, 231–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berko-Gleason, J. B., & Bernstein-Ratner, N. (2013). The development of language (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.Google Scholar
Bohannon III, J. N., & Marquis, A. L. (1977). Children's control of adult speech. Child Development, 48(3), 1002–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bornstein, M. H., Tal, J., Rahn, C., Galperín, C. Z., Pêcheux, M. G., Lamour, M., … Tamis-LeMonda, C. S. (1992). Functional analysis of the contents of maternal speech to infants of 5 and 13 months in four cultures: Argentina, France, Japan, and the United States. Developmental Psychology, 28(4), 593–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brent, M. R., & Siskind, J. M. (2001). The role of exposure to isolated words in early vocabulary development. Cognition, 81(2), B33–B44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Broen, P. A. (1972). The verbal environment of the language-learning child. ASHA Monographs, No. 17.Google Scholar
Brooks, P. J., Kempe, V., Fedorova, O., & Mironova, N. (2002). Word play in child-directed speech: diminutives as a window to noun morphology. Poster presented at the 9th Conference of the International Association for the Study of Child Language, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
Brown, R., & Bellugi, U. (1964). Three processes in the child's acquisition of syntax. Harvard Educational Review, 34(2), 133–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camaioni, L., & Longobardi, E. (2001). Noun versus verb emphasis in Italian mother-to-child speech. Journal of Child Language, 28(3), 773–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cameron-Faulkner, T., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2003). A construction based analysis of child directed speech. Cognitive Science, 27(6), 843–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caselli, M. C., Bates, E., Casadio, P., Fenson, J., Fenson, L., Sanderl, L., & Weir, J. (1995). A cross-linguistic study of early lexical development. Cognitive Development, 10(2), 159–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caselli, M. C., Pasqualetti, P., & Stefanini, S. (2007). Parole e frasi nel «Primo vocabolario del bambino». Nuovi dati normativi fra i 18 e 36 mesi e forma breve del questionario (Vol. 83). Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
Choi, S. (2000). Caregiver input in English and Korean: use of nouns and verbs in book-reading and toy-play contexts. Journal of Child Language, 27(1), 69–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coppola, G., Aureli, T., Grazia, A., & Ponzetti, S. (2016). Reunion patterns in the Still-Face Paradigm as predicted by maternal sensitivity and dyadic coordination. Infancy, 21(4), 453–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Imperio, M. (2002). Italian intonation: an overview and some questions. Probus, 14(1), 37–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Odorico, L., Fasolo, M., & Marchione, D. (2009). The prosody of early multi-word speech: word order and its intonational realization in the speech of Italian children. Enfance, 61(3), 317–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Odorico, L., & Franco, F. (1985). The determinants of baby talk: relationship to context. Journal of Child Language, 12(3), 567–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Odorico, L., Salerni, N., Cassibba, R., & Jacob, V. (1999). Stability and change of maternal speech to Italian infants from 7 to 21 months of age: a longitudinal study of its influence on early stages of language acquisition. First Language, 19(57), 313–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elman, J. L. (1993). Learning and development in neural networks: the importance of starting small. Cognition, 48(1), 71–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferguson, C. A. (1964). Baby talk in six languages. American Anthropologist, 66(6 PART2), 103–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernald, A. (1992). Human maternal vocalisations to infants as biologically relevant signals: an evolutionary perspective. In Barkow, J. H., Gosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (Eds.), The adapted mind: evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 391–428). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fernald, A., & Morikawa, H. (1993). Common themes and cultural variations in Japanese and American mothers’ speech to infants. Child Development, 64(3), 637–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fernald, A., & Simon, T. (1984). Expanded intonation contours in mothers’ speech to newborns. Developmental Psychology, 20(1), 104–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franco, F., & D'Odorico, L. (1987). Context-discourse matching in baby talk. In Verschueren, J. & Bertuccelli-Papi, M. (Eds.), The pragmatic perspective (pp. 213–28). Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franco, F., & D'Odorico, L. (1988). Baby talk from the perspective of discourse production: linguistic choices and context coding by different speakers. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 17(1), 29–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Furrow, D., Nelson, K., & Benedict, H. (1979). Mothers’ speech to children and syntactic development: some simple relationships. Journal of Child Language, 6(3), 423–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gentner, D. (1982). Why nouns are learned before verbs: linguistic relativity versus natural partitioning. Center for the Study of Reading Technical Report; no. 257. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Gillis, S. (1997). The acquisition of diminutives in Dutch. In Dressler, W. U. (Ed.), Studies in pre- and protomorphology (pp. 165–79). Vienna: Osterrichische Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Goldfield, B. A. (1993). Noun bias in maternal speech to one-year-olds. Journal of Child Language, 20(1), 85–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gopnik, A., & Meltzoff, A. (1993). Imitation, cultural learning and the origins of ‘theory of mind’. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16(3), 521–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haman, E. (2003). Early productivity in derivation: a case study of diminutives in the acquisition of Polish. Psychology of Language and Communication, 7(1), 37–56.Google Scholar
Henning, A., Striano, T., & Lieven, E. V. (2005). Maternal speech to infants at 1 and 3 months of age. Infant Behavior and Development, 28(4), 519–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huttenlocher, J., Vasilyeva, M., Waterfall, H. R., Vevea, J. L., & Hedges, L. V. (2007). The varieties of speech to young children. Developmental Psychology, 43(5), 1062–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huttenlocher, J., Waterfall, H., Vasilyeva, M., Vevea, J., & Hedges, L. V. (2010). Sources of variability in children's language growth. Cognitive Psychology, 61(4), 343–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, W. (1944). Studies in language behavior: I. A program of research. Psychological Monographs, 56(2), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaye, K. (1980). Why we don't talk baby talk to babies. Journal of Child Language, 7(3), 489–507.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kempe, V., Brooks, P. J., & Pirott, L. (2001). How can child-directed speech facilitate the acquisition of morphology? In Research on Child Language Acquisition: Proceedings of the 8th conference of the International Association for the Study of Child Language (pp. 1237–1247). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Kitamura, C., & Burnham, D. (2003). Pitch and communicative intent in mother's speech: adjustments for age and sex in the first year. Infancy, 4(1), 85–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lew-Williams, C., Pelucchi, B., & Saffran, J. R. (2011). Isolated words enhance statistical language learning in infancy. Developmental Science, 14(6), 1323–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Longobardi, E., Spataro, P., Putnick, D. L., & Bornstein, M. H. (2016). Noun and verb production in maternal and child language: continuity, stability, and prediction across the second year of life. Language Learning and Development, 12(2), 183–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES Project: tools for analyzing talk (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. (1973). Structure and strategy in learning to talk. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 38(1/2, Serial No 149), 1–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newport, E. L. (1990). Maturational constraints on language learning. Cognitive Science, 14(1), 11–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newport, E. L., Gleitman, H., & Gleitman, L. (1977). Mother, I'd rather do it myself: some effects and non-effects of maternal speech style. In Ferguson, C. A. & Snow, C. E. (Eds.), Talking to children (pp. 109–49). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Owens, R. E. (2008). Language development: an introduction (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.Google Scholar
Phillips, J. R. (1973). Syntax and vocabulary of mothers’ speech to young children: age and sex comparisons. Child Development, 44(1), 182–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ravid, D. (2010). The appearance of the verb category in Hebrew-speaking infants: a new psycholinguistic perspective. Literacy and Language, 3.Google Scholar
Remick, H. (1973). Maternal speech to children during language acquisition. In von Raffler-Engel, W. & Lebrun, Y. (Eds.), Baby talk and infant speech (pp. 223–33). Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
Rowe, M. L. (2012). A longitudinal investigation of the role of quantity and quality of child-directed speech in vocabulary development. Child Development, 83(5), 1762–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roy, B. C., Frank, M. C., & Roy, D. (2009). Exploring word learning in a high-density longitudinal corpus. In Proceedings of the Thirty-First Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, July 29–August 1, 2009, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam. Online <http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/66701>.Google Scholar
Saint-Georges, C., Chetouani, M., Cassel, R., Apicella, F., Mahdhaoui, A., Muratori, F., … Cohen, D. (2013). Motherese in interaction: at the cross-road of emotion and cognition? (a systematic review). PloSone, 8(10), e78103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandhofer, C. M., Smith, L. B., & Luo, J. (2000). Counting nouns and verbs in the input: Differential frequencies, different kinds of learning? Journal of Child Language, 27(3), 561–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savickienė, I. (1998). The acquisition of diminutives in Lithuanian. In Gillis, S. (Ed.). Studies in the acquisition of number and diminutive marking (Antwerp Papers in Linguistics, 95, pp. 115–35). Antwerp: Universiteit Anwerpen.Google Scholar
Seva, N., Kempe, V., Brooks, P. J., Mironova, N., Pershukova, A., & Fedorova, O. (2007) Crosslinguistic evidence for the diminutive advantage: gender agreement in Russian and Serbian children. Journal of Child Language, 34(1), 111–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sherrod, K. B., Friedman, S., Crawley, S., Drake, D., & Devieux, J. (1977). Maternal language to prelinguistic infants: syntactic aspects. Child Development, 48(4), 1662–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snow, C. E. (1972). Mothers’ speech to children learning language. Child Development, 43(2), 549–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soderstrom, M., Blossom, M., Foygel, R., & Morgan, J. L. (2008). Acoustical cues and grammatical units in speech to two preverbal infants. Journal of Child Language, 35(4), 869–902.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spinelli, M., Fasolo, M., & Mesman, J. (2017). Does prosody make the difference? A meta-analysis on relations between prosodic aspects of infant-directed speech and infant outcomes. Developmental Review, 44, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spinelli, M., Fasolo, M., Shah, P., Genovese, G., & Aureli, T. (2018). The influence of early temperament on language development: the moderating role of maternal input. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, e01527.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stern, D. N., Spieker, S., Barnett, R. K., & MacKain, K. (1983). The prosody of maternal speech: infant age and context related changes. Journal of Child Language, 10(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tardif, T., Shatz, M., & Naigles, L. (1997). Caregiver speech and children's use of nouns versus verbs: a comparison of English, Italian, and Mandarin. Journal of Child Language, 24(3), 535–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
The jamovi project (2019). jamovi (Version 0.9) [Computer Software]. Retrieved from <https://www.jamovi.org>..>Google Scholar
Thelen, E., & Smith, L. (1998). Dynamic systems theories. In Damon, W. (Editor-in chief) & Lerner, R. M. (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol.1: Theoretical models of human development (5th ed., pp. 563–634). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Trevarthen, C. (2001). Intrinsic motives for companionship in understanding: their origin, development and significance for infant mental health. Infant Mental Health Journal, 22(1/2), 95–131.3.0.CO;2-6>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, M., Van Geert, P., Korecky-Kröll, K., Maillochon, I., Laaha, S., Dressler, W. U., & Bassano, D. (2013). Dynamic adaptation in child–adult language interaction. Language Learning, 63(2), 243–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Geert, P. (2003). Dynamic systems approaches and modelling of developmental processes. In Valsiner, J. & Connolly, K. J. (Eds.), Handbook of developmental psychology (pp. 640–72). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Vosoughi, S. (2010). Interactions of caregiver speech and early word learning in the speechome corpus: computational explorations (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology). Online <https://www.media.mit.edu/cogmac/publications/soroush_masters_thesis_2010.pdf>..>Google Scholar