Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:11:06.324Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Individual differences in the influence of phonological characteristics on expressive vocabulary development by young children

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 August 2006

JUNKO MAEKAWA
Affiliation:
University of Kansas
HOLLY L. STORKEL
Affiliation:
University of Kansas

Abstract

The current study attempts to differentiate effects of phonotactic probability (i.e. the likelihood of occurrence of a sound sequence), neighbourhood density (i.e. the number of phonologically similar words), word frequency, and word length on expressive vocabulary development by young children. Naturalistic conversational samples for three children (age 1;4–3;1) were obtained from CHILDES. In a backward regression analysis, phonotactic probability, neighbourhood density, word frequency, and word length were entered as possible predictors of ages of first production of words for each child. Results showed that the factors affecting first production of words varied across children and across word types. Specifically, word length affected ages of first production for all three children, whereas the other three variables affected only one child each. The implications of these findings for models of expressive vocabulary development are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This study was supported by the National Institutes of Health (grant DC04781). Jennie Fox and Maki Sueto contributed to the processing of the CHILDES data. Michael Vitevitch supported with the calculation of neighbourhood density and phonotactic probability. Diane Loeb, Joan Sereno, Hugh Catts, Michael Vitevitch, and Jill Hoover provided comments on an earlier version of this manuscript. We greatly appreciate these contributions.