Hostname: page-component-7b9c58cd5d-v2ckm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-16T04:34:24.761Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Individual differences in early vocabulary development: redefining the referential-expressive distinction*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

Elena V. M. Lieven ,
Julian M. Pine  and
Helen Dresner Barnes
Elena V. M. Lieven*
Affiliation:
University of Manchester
Julian M. Pine
Affiliation:
University of Dundee
Helen Dresner Barnes
Affiliation:
Trafford Health Authority
*
Department of Psychology, Manchester University, Manchester Mi3 gPL, UK.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The existence of stylistic variation between children in the early stages of language acquisition has been most frequently studied using Nelson's 0973) referential—expressive distinction. While the use of this distinction has generated a great deal of interesting research, there are a number of major problems associated with it. The present study presents a simple scheme, based on formal categories, for coding stylistic variation in the early lexicon. When applied to the first 50 and 100 words of 12 children collected between 0; 11 and 2; 3, the major dimensions of difference are found to be the relative proportion of common nouns and the relative proportion of frozen phrases. Moreover, the proportion of frozen phrases is also found to be significantly positively related to children's early productivity, suggesting that, rather than being a ‘deadend’ in early language development, the acquisition of frozen phrases may provide an alternative route into multiword speech.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , June 1992 , pp. 287 - 310
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

We would like to thank all the families who took part in this study and to acknowledge the assistance of Tameside Regional Health Authority in collecting the sample.

References

REFERENCES

Barrett, M. (1989). Early language development. In Slater, A. & Bremner, G. (eds), Infant development. London: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bates, E., Bretherton, I. & Snyder, L. (1988). From first words to grammar: individual differences and dissociable mechanisms. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Braine, M. D. S. (1976). Children's first word combinations. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 41 (1).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bretherton, I., McNew, S., Snyder, L. & Bates, E. (1983). Individual differences at twenty months: analytic and holistic strategies in language acquisition. Journal of Child Language 10, 293–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. (1973). A first language: the early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, R. (1974). Performing without competence. Journal of Child Langauge 1, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldfield, B. A. (1985/1986). Referential and expressive language: a study of two mother-child dyads. First Language 6, 119–31.Google Scholar
Goldfield, B. A. (1987). The contribution of child and caregiver to referential and expressive language. Applied Psycholinguistics 8, 267–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldfield, B. A. (1990). Pointing, naming and talk about objects: referential behaviour in children and mothers. First Language 10, 231–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldfield, B. A. & Snow, C. E. (1989). Individual differences in language acquisition. In Gleason, J. (ed.), The development of language. Columbus: Merrill.Google Scholar
Gopnik, A. & Choi, S. (1990). Do linguistic differences lead to cognitive differences? A cross-linguistic study of semantic and cognitive development. First Language 10, 199–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hampson, J. (1989). Elements of style: maternal and child contributions to referential and expressive styles of language acquisition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, City University of New York.Google Scholar
Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with words. Cambridge: C.U.P.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieven, E. V. M. (1980). Different routes to multiple-word combinations? Papers and Reports on Child Language Development 19, 34–44.Google Scholar
Lieven, E. V. M. (1989). The linguistic implications of early and systematic variation in child language development. In K. Hall, M. Meacham & R. Shapiro (eds), Proceedings of the 15th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, E. (1987). Child characteristics and the referential—expressive distinction in early language. Paper given at the Child Language Seminar, York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McShane, J. (1980). Learning to talk. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Mulford, (1987). First words of the blind child. In Smith, M. D. & Locke, J. L. (eds), The emergent lexicon: the child's development of a linguistic vocabulary. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. (1973). Structure and strategy in learning to talk. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 38 (1–2).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, K. (1981). Individual differences in language development: implications for development and language. Developmental Psychology 17, 170–87.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. E., Baker, N. D., Denninger, M., Bonvillian, J. D. & Kaplan, B. J. (1985). Cookie versus do-it-again: imitative-referential and personal-social-syntactic-initiating language styles in young children. Linguistics 23, 455–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ochs, E. (1988). Culture and language acquisition: acquiring conversational competence in a Western Samoan village. New York: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Office of Population Censuses and Surveys (1970). Classification of occupations. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Olson, S. L., Bayles, K. & Bates, J. E. (1986). Mother and child interaction and children's speech progress: a longitudinal study of the first two years. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 32, 1–20.Google Scholar
Peters, A. M. (1977). Language learning strategies: does the whole equal the sum of the parts? Language 53, 560–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, A. M. (1983). The units of language acquisition. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Pine, J. M. (1990). Individual differences in early language development and their relationship to maternal style. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
Pine, J. M. (1992). The functional basis of referentiality; evidence from children's spontaneous speech. First Language 12, 39–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pine, J. M. & Lieven, E. V. M. (1990). Referential style at thirteen months; why age-defined cross-sectional measures are inappropriate for the study of strategy differences in early language development. Journal of Child Language 17, 625–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schieffelin, B. B. (1986). The acquisition of Kaluli. In Slobin, D. (ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. & Todd, J. (1983). Joint attention and lexical acquisition style. First Language 4, 197–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar