Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:18:20.320Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Incidence of verbal comparisons in beginners' books and in metaphor comprehension research: a search for ecological validity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

Victor Broderick*
Affiliation:
Texas Tech University
*
Department of Social Sciences, Ferms State University, Big Rapids, MI 49307, USA.

Abstract

Explicit verbal comparisons in 53 popular children's books were syntactically and semantically classified. Comparison types found in these books were contrasted with comparisons used as comprehension stimuli in extant developmental research. Although noun-phrase metaphor has been a popular syntactic form in research, it is a rare form in children's literature. Implications for the design of future stimulus sets are discussed.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Asch, S. & Nerlove, H. (1960). The development of double function terms in children. In Kaplan, B. & Wapner, S. (eds), Perspectives in psychological theory. New York: International University Press.Google Scholar
Billow, R. M. (1975). A cognitive developmental study of metaphor comprehension. Developmental Psychology 11, 415–23.Google Scholar
Cicone, M., Gardner, H. & Winner, E. (1981). Understanding the psychology of psychological metaphors. Journal of Child Language 8, 213–16.Google Scholar
Cometa, M. S. & Eson, M. E. (1978). Logical operations and metaphor interpretation: a Piagetian model. Child Development 49, 649–59.Google Scholar
Douglas, J. D. & Peal, B. (1979). The development of metaphor and proverb translation in children grades 1–7. Journal of Educational Research 73, 116–19.Google Scholar
Epstein, R. L. & Gamlin, P. J. (1987). Young children's perception and comprehension of metaphorical similarities in pictures and in words. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Flesch, R. (1951). How to test readability New York: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar
Gardner, H., Kircher, M., Winner, E. & Perkins, D. (1974). Children's metaphoric productions and preferences. Journal of Child Language 2, 125–41.Google Scholar
Nippold, M. A., Leonard, L. B. & Kail, R. (1984). Syntactic and conceptual factors in children's understanding of metaphors. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 27, 197205.Google Scholar
Reynolds, R. E. & Ortony, A. (1980). Some issues in the measurement of children's comprehension of metaphorical language. Child Development 51, 1110–19.Google Scholar
Silberstein, L., Gardner, H., Phelps, E. & Winner, E. (1982). Autumn leaves and old photographs: the development of metaphor preferences. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 34, 135–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vosniadou, S. & Ortony, A. (1983). The emergence of the literal-metaphorical-anomalous distinction in young children. Child Development 54, 154–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vosniadou, S., Ortony, A., Reynolds, R. E. & Wilson, P. T. (1984). Sources of difficulty in children's understanding of metaphorical language. Child Development 55, 1588–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waggoner, J. E., Messe, M. J. & Palermo, D. S. (1985). Grasping the meaning of metaphor: story recall and comprehension. Child Development 56, 1156–66.Google Scholar
Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary (1977). Springfield, MA: Merriam.Google Scholar
Winner, E., Engel, M. & Gardner, H. (1980). Misunderstanding metaphor: what's the problem? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 30, 2232.Google Scholar
Winner, E., Rosenstiel, A. & Gardner, H. (1976). The development of metaphoric understanding. Developmental Psychology 12, 289–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar