Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:01:27.548Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How children talk about a conversation*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Asli Özyürek
Asli Özyürek*
Affiliation:
The University of Chicago
*
Departments of Psychology and Linguistics, 5848 S. University Ave. Chicago IL 60637, USA. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study investigates how children of different ages talk about a conversation that they have witnessed. 48 Turkish children, five, nine and thirteen years in age, saw a televised dialogue between two Sesame Street characters (Bert and Ernie). Afterward, they narrated what they had seen and heard. Their reports were analysed for the development of linguistic devices used to orient their listeners to the relevant properties of a conversational exchange. Each utterance in the child's narrative was analysed as to its conversational role: (1) whether the child used direct or indirect quotation frames; (2) whether the child marked the boundaries of conversational turns using speakers' names and (3) whether the child used a marker for pairing of utterances made by different speakers (agreement-disagreement, request-refusal, questioning-answering). Within pairings, children's use of (a) the temporal and evaluative connectivity markers and (b) the kind of verb of saying were identified. The data indicate that there is a developmental change in children's ability to use appropriate linguistic means to orient their listeners to the different properties of a conversation. The development and use of these linguistic means enable the child to establish different social roles in a narrative interaction. The findings are interpreted in terms of the child's social-communicative development from being a ‘character’ to becoming a ‘narrator’ and ‘author’ of the reported conversation in the narrative situation.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 23 , Issue 3 , October 1996 , pp. 693 - 714
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[*]

Versions of this paper have been presented as an MA thesis for the Department of Psychology, University of Chicago, at the 1994 Chicago Linguistic Society conference and also the 1994 Stanford Child Language Research Forum. This research was supported, in part, by a grant from the Spencer Foundation to T. Trabasso. I am especially grateful to Tom Trabasso and also to William Hanks, David McNeill and Nedim Nomer for their comments and criticisms. Esra Özyürek contributed to the data collection.

References

REFERENCES

Bamberg, M. (1986). The acquisition of narratives, learning to use language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cassell, J. (1991). The development of the expression of time and event in narrative, Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Ely, R. & McCabe, A. (1993). Remembered voices. Journal of Child Language 20, 671–96.Google Scholar
Enc, M. (1986). Topic switching and pronominal subjects in Turkish. In Slobin, D. I. & Zimmer, K. (eds), Studies in Turkish linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Goodell, E. W. & Sachs, J. (1992). Direct and indirect speech in children's retold narratives. Discourse Processes 15, 395–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, H. M. (1990). He-said-she-said. Talk as social organization among black children. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Hanks, W. F. (1990). Referential practice: language and lived space among the Maya. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hickmann, M. (1982). Metapragmatics in child language. In Mertz, E. & Parmentier, R. (eds), Semiotic mediation: psychological and sociocultural perspectives. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hickmann, M. (1993). The boundaries of reported speech in narrative discourse: some developmental aspects. In Lucy, J. A. (eds), Reflexive language: reported speech and metapragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A. & Jefferson, G. (1974). A symplistic systimatics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. Language 50, 696–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica 7 (4), 289–327.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1986). The acquisition and use of relative clauses in Turkic and Indo-European languages. In Slobin, D. I. & Zimmer, K. (eds), Studies in Turkish linguistics. Amsterdm: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Underhill, R. (1976). Turkish grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Voloshinov, V. (1973). Marxism and the philosophy of language. Matejka, L. and Titunik, I. (trans). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wade, E. & Clark, H. (1993). Reproduction and Demonstration in Quotations. Journal of Memory and Language 32 (5).Google Scholar