Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T14:08:53.819Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genetic factors in the ontogeny of spoken language: evidence from monozygotic and dizygotic twins*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

John L. Locke  and
Patricia L. Mather
John L. Locke*
Affiliation:
MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, Massachusetts and Harvard Medical School
Patricia L. Mather
Affiliation:
Northeastern Illinois University
*
Neurolinguistics Laboratory, MGH Institute of Health Professions, 15 River Street, Boston, MA 02108, USA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recent controversy about the innateness of language has awakened interest in the genetic basis of linguistic development. In this study, we analysed more extensively data from Mather & Black (1984).in order to test the hypothesis that the speech articulation of monozygotic (MZ) twins would be qualitatively more similar than that of age- and sex-matched dizygotic (DZ) twins. Analyses revealed that 4–year-old MZ twin pairs were significantly more likely to misproduce the same sounds on an articulation test than were DZ twin pairs, and that DZ twins were no more likely to share errors than were children who were both genetically and environmentally unrelated. There was no evidence that MZ twins made more similar errors than DZ twins, and indeed it was difficult to make this determination since only broad categories of error (substitution, distortion, omission) were available for analysis. The greater amount of genetic material shared by MZ twins, and the presumably more similar morphology of their speech mechanisms, may have caused certain sound patterns to be of more nearly equal difficulty for both members of a MZ pair. However, these findings need to be confirmed with phonetically more detailed analyses.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 16 , Issue 3 , October 1989 , pp. 553 - 559
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Based on a talk presented at the 1987 Meeting of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association in New Orleans. The authors are indebted to Dawn Pearson for assistance with statistical analyses and the preparation of figures.

References

REFERENCES

Bakwin, H. (1973). Reading disability in twins. Developmental Medicine and Child Neutology 15. 184–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chomsky, N. (1975). Reflections on language. New York: Pantheon Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
DeFries, J. C. (1985). Colorado Reading Project. In Gray, D. B. & Kavanagh, J. F. (eds), Biobehavioral measures of dyslexia. Parkton MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Howie, P. M. (1981). Concordance for stuttering in monozygotic and dizygotic twin pairs. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 24. 317–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kidd, K. K. & Records, M. A. (1979). Genetic methodologies for the study of speech. In Breakefield, X. O. (ed.), Neurogenetics: genetic approaches to the nervous system. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Locke, J. L. (1983). Phonological acquisition and change. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Locke, J. L. (1986). The linguistic significance of babbling. In Lindblom, B. & Zetterstrom, R. (eds), Precursors of early speech. New York: Stockton Press.Google Scholar
Locke, J. L. (in press). Structure and function in the ontogeny of spoken language. Developmental Psychobiology.Google Scholar
Matheny, A. P. & Bruggemann, C. (1972). Articulation proficiency in twins and singletons from families of twins. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 15. 845–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mather, P. L. & Black, K. N. (1984). Heredity and environmental influences on preschool twins' language skills. Developmental Psychology 20. 303–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, J. L. (1986). From simple input to complex grammar. Cambridge MA: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Neils, J. & Aram, D. M. (1986). Family history of children with developmental language disorders. Perceptual and motor skills 63. 655–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ohala, J. J. (1983). The origin of sound patterns in vocal tract constraints. In MacNeilage, P. F. (ed.), The production of speech. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Plomin, R. & Daniels, D. (1987). Why are children in the same family so different from one another? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 10. 1–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1985). Plasticity and invariance in cognitive development. In Mehler, J. & Fox, R. (eds), Neonate cognition: beyond the blooming buzzing confusion. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Segal, N. L. (1985). Monozygotic and dizygotic twins: a comparative analysis of mental ability profiles. Child Development 56, 1051–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Templin, M. C. (1957). Certain language skills in children: their development and inter-relationships. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Templin, M. C. & Darley, F. (1969). The Templin-Darley tests of articulation. Iowa City IA: Bureau of Educational Research and Service Extension Division, University of Iowa.Google Scholar
Wexler, K. & Culicover, P. W. (1980). Formal principles of language acquisition. Cambridge MA: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar