Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:36:02.593Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fuzzy boundaries and the extension of object-words*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

Bob Carabine
Bob Carabine*
Affiliation:
University of Southampton
*
c/o Educational Psychology, Department of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An extensive fuzzy boundary was identified within the adult extension of two exemplary object-words, ‘dog’ and ‘ball’. The fuzzy boundaries were incorporated into the standard of adult extension against which the preschool child's use of ‘dog’ and ‘ball’ was compared, and the investigation provided a framework in which children's responses to fuzzy boundary referents could be accommodated. Responses to fuzzy boundary referents were considered as having precedents within adult extension and the data revealed the provision of precedents for a significant number of the young child's applications and non-applications of the words. The investigation concluded that, through adherence to an oversimplified concept of adult extension, previous research has underestimated the degree of correspondence that exists between child and adult extension.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 18 , Issue 2 , June 1991 , pp. 355 - 372
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This paper is based on a doctoral dissertation submitted to the University of York. The research was supported by the Science and Engineering Research Council of Great Britain. I am grateful to Maureen Cox for her advice and comments.

References

REFERENCES

Andersen, E. S. (1975). Cups and glasses: learning that boundaries are vague. Journal of Child Language 2, 79–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anglin, J. M. (1977). Word, object, and conceptual development. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Anglin, J. M. (1985). The child's expressible knowledge of word concepts: what preschoolers can say about the meanings of some nouns and verbs. In Nelson, K. E. (ed.), Children's language. Vol. 5. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Barrett, M. D. (1986). Early semantic representations and early word-usage. In Kuczaj, S. A. & Barrett, M. D. (eds), The development of word meaning: progress in cognitive development research. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Behrend, D. A. (1988). Overextensions in early language comprehension: evidence from a signal detection approach. Journal of Child Language 15, 63–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berlin, B. & Kay, P. (1969). Basic color terms. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Black, M. (1949). Language and philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Carabine, B. (1984). The extension of object-words by young children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, York University.Google Scholar
Clark, E. V. (1973). What's in a word? On the child's acquisition of semantics in his first language. In Moore, T. E. (ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Clark, E. V. (1983). Meanings and concepts. In Mussen, P. H. (ed.), Handbook of child psychology. Vol. 3. Cognitive development. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Fremgen, A. & Fay, D. (1980). Overextensions in production and comprehension: a methodological clarification. Journal of Child Language 7, 205–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenberg, J. A. & Kuczaj, S. A. (1982). Towards a theory of substantive word-meaning acquisition. In Kuczaj, S. A. (ed.), Language development: syntax and semantics. Vol. 1. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gruendel, J. M. (1977). Referential extension in early language development. Child Development 48, 1567–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoek, D., Ingram, D. & Gibson, D. (1986). Some possible causes of children's early word Overextensions. Journal of Child Language 13, 477–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kay, D. A. & Anglin, J. M. (1982). Overextension and underextension in the child's expressive and receptive speech. Journal of Child Language 9, 83–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kooij, J. G. (1971). Ambiguity in natural language. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Kuczaj, S. A. (1982). Young children's Overextensions of object words in comprehension and/or production: support for a prototype theory of early object word meaning. First Language 3, 93–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W. (1973). The boundaries of words and their meanings. In Bailey, C. J. N. and Shuy, R. W. (eds), New ways of analysing variation in English. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1972). Hedges: a study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. Papers from the Eighth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. 183–228.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things: what categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leopold, W. F. (1949). Speech development of a bilingual child. Vol. 3. Evanston, Ill: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
McCloskey, M. E. & Glucksberg, S. (1978). Natural categories: well defined or fuzzy sets? Memory and Cognition 6, 462–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mervis, C. B. & Rosch, E. (1981). Categorisation of natural objects. Annual Review of Psychology 32, 89–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, G. A. (1978). The acquisition of word meaning. Child Development 49, 999–1004.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. (1973). Structure and strategy in learning to talk. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 38, No. 149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, K. (1974). Concept, word and sentence: interrelations in acquisition and development. Psychological Review 81, 267–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, D. R. (1977). The context of language acquisition. In Macnamara, J. (ed.), Language learning and thought. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Palermo, D. S. (1982). Theoretical issues in semantic development. In Kuczaj, S. A. (ed.), Language development. Vol. 1. Syntax and semantics. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Rescorla, L. A. (1980). Overextensions in early language development. Journal of Child Language 7, 321–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosch, E. (1973). On the internal structure of perceptual and semantic categories. In Moore, T. E. (ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorisation. In Rosch, E. & Lloyd, B. (eds), Cognition and categorisation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Siegel, S. (1956). Nonparametric statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Thomson, J. & Chapman, R. S. (1977). Who is ‘daddy’ revisited: the status of two-year-olds' overextended words in use and comprehension. Journal of Child Language 4, 359–75.Google Scholar